Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Achim Gratz
Yaakov Selkowitz writes: >> Looking at the executable it seems that it is a very small (~66 kiB) >> stub that then proceeds to load the rest of the file after having >> started the runtime. The memory image seems simply bolted on (as an >> overlay?), and gets removed when the executable is strippe

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 23:16 +0100, Achim Gratz wrote: > Ken Brown writes: > > The clisp executables are not stripped because apparently there's a > > disassemble command within clisp that doesn't work if the executables > > are stripped. I don't actually know anything about this, but there > > was

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: > The clisp executables are not stripped because apparently there's a > disassemble command within clisp that doesn't work if the executables > are stripped. I don't actually know anything about this, but there > was a comment about that in the .cygport file that I inherited from

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: >> No it doesn't. Specifically, it doesn't like being stripped. I'll >> RESTRICT that, let's hope it works now… Yup, it does. > > Great. Thanks for testing. There's probably no reason for me to > upload a new clisp package right now (unless it would help you). But > I'll giv

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/16/2015 4:07 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Yaakov Selkowitz writes: Is there an issue with stripping clisp executables? Yes, with the executable dumps. Is there a magic number we can use to detect these automatically? File identifies them as plain executables. CLisp knows which runtime they

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/16/2015 3:41 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Achim Gratz writes: The loading of memory images via clisp works, so I'll pull the maxima-exec-clisp package until we get to the bottom of this. Hmm. Scratch that, I think I got the maxima.exe (dumped image) to work. Let's see if it survives installati

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Achim Gratz
Yaakov Selkowitz writes: > Is there an issue with stripping clisp executables? Yes, with the executable dumps. > Is there a magic > number we can use to detect these automatically? File identifies them as plain executables. CLisp knows which runtime they were rpdocued from, so there must by som

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 20:41 +0100, Achim Gratz wrote: > Achim Gratz writes: > >> The loading of memory images via clisp works, so I'll pull the > >> maxima-exec-clisp package until we get to the bottom of this. > > > > Hmm. Scratch that, I think I got the maxima.exe (dumped image) to work. > > Let

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Achim Gratz
Achim Gratz writes: >> The loading of memory images via clisp works, so I'll pull the >> maxima-exec-clisp package until we get to the bottom of this. > > Hmm. Scratch that, I think I got the maxima.exe (dumped image) to work. > Let's see if it survives installation. No it doesn't. Specifically,

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Achim Gratz
Achim Gratz writes: > Ken Brown writes: >> Just for testing purposes, I've built a new clisp with >> /usr/bin/cyglisp.dll and /usr/lib/liblisp.dll.a, and I've uploaded it >> to my Cygwin repository: >> >> http://sanibeltranquility.com/cygwin/ >> >> When you get a chance, please test it and see if

Re: Question about clisp version naming

2015-03-16 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: > Just for testing purposes, I've built a new clisp with > /usr/bin/cyglisp.dll and /usr/lib/liblisp.dll.a, and I've uploaded it > to my Cygwin repository: > > http://sanibeltranquility.com/cygwin/ > > When you get a chance, please test it and see if it allows you to > avoid you

Re: perl-5.14.4

2015-03-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 14 21:30, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> So the binutils problem is fixed upstream, we're just waiting for GDB > >> to catch up. Another collegue of mine will have a look as soon as time > >> permits. > > > > Here's one for testing, Achim: > > > > https://cygwin.com/ml/c