Re: [PATCH] setup: allow running as non-admin

2013-11-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:39:51AM +1100, Shaddy Baddah wrote: >Hi, > > >On Nov 07 11:23, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> As discussed, please find the patch to allow setup to be run as a >>> non-admin user include clear text. Thanks. I'll let Corinna have the final say on this but I re

Re: [PATCH] setup: allow running as non-admin

2013-11-06 Thread Shaddy Baddah
Hi, On Nov 07 11:23, Christopher Faylor wrote: Hi, As discussed, please find the patch to allow setup to be run as a non-admin user include clear text. -- Regards, Shaddy Only a very minor comment: + +// Note, this is necessary to avoid an infinite loop. +// The understan

Re: [PATCH] setup: allow running as non-admin

2013-11-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:25:37AM +1100, Shaddy Baddah wrote: >Hi Christopher, > >On Nov 07 11:23, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> This indentation looks wrong. > >Should I correct and republish? Yes, please. cgf

Re: [PATCH] setup: allow running as non-admin

2013-11-06 Thread Shaddy Baddah
Hi Christopher, On Nov 07 11:23, Christopher Faylor wrote: This indentation looks wrong. Should I correct and republish? -- Regards, Shaddy

Re: [PATCH] setup: allow running as non-admin

2013-11-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:52:00AM +1100, Shaddy Baddah wrote: >Hi, > >As discussed, please find the patch to allow setup to be run as a >non-admin user include clear text. > >-- >Regards, >Shaddy > Only a very minor comment: >+ >+// Note, this is necessary to avoid an infinite loop. >+

[PATCH] setup: allow running as non-admin

2013-11-06 Thread Shaddy Baddah
Hi, As discussed, please find the patch to allow setup to be run as a non-admin user include clear text. -- Regards, Shaddy 2013-11-06 Shaddy Baddah * LogFile.cc (LogFile::flushAll): New function to flush log all logging to files without exiting (as LogFile::exit does). * LogFile.h: Decla

Re: cannot run setup64.exe without admin privileges (even if renamed foo.exe)

2013-11-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 6 11:12, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:43:22PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Looks fine to me. When you're ready to go, please send the complete > >patch in cleartext (not compressed) with a ChangeLog entry. I will > >give it a try and apply soon, so we can fi

Re: cannot run setup64.exe without admin privileges (even if renamed foo.exe)

2013-11-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:43:22PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >Looks fine to me. When you're ready to go, please send the complete >patch in cleartext (not compressed) with a ChangeLog entry. I will >give it a try and apply soon, so we can finally get rid of this problem. And, I'll be standi

Re: cannot run setup64.exe without admin privileges (even if renamed foo.exe)

2013-11-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Shaddy, On Nov 7 00:20, Shaddy Baddah wrote: > Hi, > > On Nov 06 22:16, Shaddy Baddah wrote: > >On Nov 04 22:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>any news? > > > > > > >I still want to implement and test excluding enforced elevation as a > >default on XP, as I am sure it will be a nuisance. But I

Re: cannot run setup64.exe without admin privileges (even if renamed foo.exe)

2013-11-06 Thread Shaddy Baddah
Hi, On Nov 06 22:16, Shaddy Baddah wrote: On Nov 04 22:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote: any news? I still want to implement and test excluding enforced elevation as a default on XP, as I am sure it will be a nuisance. But I'll publish that as a separate patch in a couple of hours from now (I e

Re: cannot run setup64.exe without admin privileges (even if renamed foo.exe)

2013-11-06 Thread Shaddy Baddah
Hi Corinna, On Nov 04 22:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote: any news? Sorry, yes. I have seen the emails (I do like cats :-D). I shouldn't offer excuses, but two concepts can explain my time deficit in the intervening period: terrible twos and various viruses (non computer). Kicked into action ;-) I