On 3/1/2013 03:42, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:14:22 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Could someone fix this please?
>
> I removed the require for the moment, but the proper solution is to
> provide the jar in the distro. If you want, I could do that in a way
> that doesn
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:06:21 -1000, NightStrike wrote:
> Does cygwin have an automatic package building machinery thing like
> Fedora? Fedora does mass rebuilds with mingw-w64 often, for instance.
No, we don't, and we haven't done a mass rebuild since 1.5.0 IIRC
(too long, IMO).
Yaakov
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:14:22 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Could someone fix this please?
I removed the require for the moment, but the proper solution is to
provide the jar in the distro. If you want, I could do that in a way
that doesn't require pulling in the entire GNU Classpath environm
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Yaakov
wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:59:20 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Feb 27 21:29, JonY wrote:
>> > I'm worried that I might break gcc installs if I overlooked something
>> > obvious.
>> >
>> > The upload will be overwriting the .hint files, java and
Could someone fix this please?
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:59:20 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 27 21:29, JonY wrote:
> > I'm worried that I might break gcc installs if I overlooked something
> > obvious.
> >
> > The upload will be overwriting the .hint files, java and libffi are
> > empty packages (I could not get java to
