Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0 - public domain

2012-10-25 Thread Achim Gratz
David Sastre Medina writes: > The only outstanding issue I can think of right now, would be > to revert this change: > > -PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:${PATH}" > +ORIGINAL_PATH="${PATH}" > +PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin" > > The details about this issue can be found here: > http://cygwin.com/ml/c

Re: [RFU] w3m-0.5.3-2

2012-10-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:14:53PM -0400, Bob Heckel wrote: >Please upload w3m-0.5.3-2 as current, delete w3m-0.5.3-1 and leave >w3m-0.5.2-2 as previous. > >wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ >http://bheckel.sdf.org/cygwin/w3m/w3m-0.5.3-2-src.tar.bz2 \ >http://bheckel.sdf.org/cygwin/w3m/w3m-0.5.3-2.tar.bz2

Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0 - public domain

2012-10-25 Thread Jari Aalto
2012-10-26 00:20 David Sastre Medina On 2012-10-25 23:20, David Sastre Medina wrote: | > https://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git | | Most probably, a wrong assumption on my side. No worries, it caught my attention as it was an unusual choice, considering the existing licencing policy in Open S

Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0 - public domain

2012-10-25 Thread David Sastre Medina
> https://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git Most probably, a wrong assumption on my side. I am not a lawyer, and most of this parlance goes far beyond my understanding. I wouldn't mean any harm whatsoever to this project, or would I purposedly introduced a legal flaw by using the Public Domain Li

Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0 - public domain

2012-10-25 Thread Jari Aalto
2012-10-25 17:17 Warren Young 2012-10-25 17:17 Warren Young | On 10/25/2012 12:43 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: | > | >According to: | > | > git clone git://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git base-files.git | > | > | > May files are put out using CC0 license[1]. I'm wondering this as it is | > to my un

Please hold off on new package updates for a while

2012-10-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
Something funny seems to be going on with the mirrors. A number have been out of date for a day or more. Please don't upload any packages for 24 hours so that I can assess the problem. Thanks. cgf

Re: [RFU] unison*

2012-10-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 24 12:08, Andrew Schulman wrote: > Please upload new versions of unison2.27, unison2.32, and unison2.40, and a > new > package unison2.45. While unison2.45 is technically a new package, it > shouldn't > need GTG as it's just a new version of Unison, like the other unison* > packages. >

Re: LICENSE: base-files and use of CC0

2012-10-25 Thread Warren Young
On 10/25/2012 12:43 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: According to: git clone git://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git base-files.git May files are put out using CC0 license[1]. I'm wondering this as it is to my understanding recommended only for data (images, pure data files, databases etc.), or for