2011/1/11, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:23:45AM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
>>On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:57:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
>>> >OK. Please bump the cygwin package release number when yo
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:23:45AM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:57:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
>> >OK. Please bump the cygwin package release number when you do that.
>> Why bump the package release
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:57:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
> >OK. Please bump the cygwin package release number when you do that.
> Why bump the package release on something that has never been released?
> I think it makes sen
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:07:13PM +0100, Jorge D?az wrote:
>> 2011/1/10 David Sastre : <===!!?
>> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:12:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >> On Jan ?9 12:58, David Sastre wrote:
>> >> > On Sun, Jan 09, 20
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:43:31PM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
> I have prepared last set of packages.
>
> - added setup.hint and README to packages
Thanks.
> - cygport deleted /var/varnish empty dir when packing, fixed with
> keepdir instruction in cygport
I overlooked that...
> - IPv6
I have prepared last set of packages.
- added setup.hint and README to packages
- cygport deleted /var/varnish empty dir when packing, fixed with
keepdir instruction in cygport
- IPv6 test is enabled (c5.vtc) is passed ok (windows xp
problems was caused by a machine configuration erro
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:07:13PM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
> 2011/1/10 David Sastre : <===!!¹
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:12:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Jan 9 12:58, David Sastre wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:54:26AM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
> >> > > Can you try inst
I am working on it.
I have added "setup.hint and README" files and also made two minor changes.
I think it will be finished today.
2011/1/10 David Sastre :
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:12:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jan 9 12:58, David Sastre wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:12:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 9 12:58, David Sastre wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:54:26AM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
> > > Can you try installing recent Cygwin snapshot
> > > Can you try launching only failed test r00326.vtc??
> > > Can you send m
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:08:06PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 6 17:04, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > New package available at:
> > http://www.eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-2.tar.bz2
> > http://www.eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-files-4.0-2.tar.bz2
On Jan 9 12:58, David Sastre wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:54:26AM +0100, Jorge Díaz wrote:
> > Can you try installing recent Cygwin snapshot
> > Can you try launching only failed test r00326.vtc??
> > Can you send me your IPv6 error log?
>
> CYGWIN_NT-6.1 win7 1.7.8s(0.234/5/3) 20101229 01
On Jan 6 17:04, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > New package available at:
> >
> > http://www-eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-file-4.0-2.tar.bz2
> > http://www-eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-file-4.0-2.tar.bz2.sig
>
> http://www.eco-lution.tv/cygwin/release/base-files/base-f
On Jan 4 19:08, Michael McTernan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please upload mscgen-0.19-1 which follows a new upstream release:
>
> wget -nd -P mscgen \
> http://www.mcternan.me.uk/mscgen/cygport/mscgen-0.19-1.tar.bz2 \
> http://www.mcternan.me.uk/mscgen/cygport/mscgen-0.19-1-src.tar.bz2
Uploaded.
Th
13 matches
Mail list logo
