Re: [ITA] - base-files base-passwd

2010-09-17 Thread Andy Koppe
On 17 September 2010 21:43, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 17 21:23, Andy Koppe wrote: >> On 17 September 2010 15:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> 5 As stated in the referenced thread, there is no way to prevent attackers >> >> to create a user's home dir before she/he logins the first time othe

[RFU] mintty-0.9b1-1

2010-09-17 Thread Andy Koppe
Please upload: wget http://mintty.googlecode.com/files/mintty-0.9b1-1.tar.bz2 wget http://mintty.googlecode.com/files/mintty-0.9b1-1-src.tar.bz2 wget http://mintty.googlecode.com/svn/tags/0.9-beta1/cygport/setup.hint This is a test release. The postinstall/preremove scripts put setup.exe's new CY

Re: [ITA] - base-files base-passwd

2010-09-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 17 21:23, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 17 September 2010 15:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> 5 As stated in the referenced thread, there is no way to prevent attackers > >> to create a user's home dir before she/he logins the first time other than > >> disallowing anyone but the Administrator to d

Re: [ITA] - base-files base-passwd

2010-09-17 Thread Andy Koppe
On 17 September 2010 15:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> 5 As stated in the referenced thread, there is no way to prevent attackers >> to create a user's home dir before she/he logins the first time other than >> disallowing anyone but the Administrator to do that. >> If the proposed workaround (issu

Re: [ITA] - base-files base-passwd

2010-09-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 17 18:47, David Sastre wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:50:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > What's wrong with the proposed patch? The only problem I have with it > > is the fact that it uses tr and sed to find out what shell it's running > > in. There is probably a way to do this

Re: [ITA] - base-files base-passwd

2010-09-17 Thread David Sastre
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:50:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 17 13:59, David Sastre wrote: > > > > Regarding the ITA of these packages, and the proposed patches, I have > > some thoughts to share and discuss before I repackage them. > > > > 2 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-02/msg0

Re: [ITA] - base-files base-passwd

2010-09-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 17 13:59, David Sastre wrote: > Hello, > > Regarding the ITA of these packages, and the proposed patches, I have > some thoughts to share and discuss before I repackage them. > > 1 http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-04/msg00521.html > case sensitivity of system32 dir (win7 and vista) >

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64 (32-bit)

2010-09-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 17 10:33, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 9/17/2010 7:24 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > cygwin-pkg-maint? > > Done. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64 (32-bit)

2010-09-17 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/17/2010 7:24 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > cygwin-pkg-maint? Done. -- Chuck

Re: [ITA] - base-files base-passwd

2010-09-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:59:32PM +0200, David Sastre wrote: >4 Can we consider this? what are the circular dependencies in that scenario? >AFAICT, including base-passwd in base-files, and afterwards dropping >base-passwd dependencies anywhere else should be harmless. Unless Corinna disagrees, I'

Re: [ITA] ocaml 3.12.0

2010-09-17 Thread Damien Doligez
On 2010-09-13, at 06:12, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > gcc3 is deprecated; distro packages should be built with gcc4, and all > Ports packages for Cygwin 1.7 are built with gcc4. So OCaml definitely > builds with gcc4. I checked and yes it works. > How soon can you rebuild ocaml with gcc4 and fle

[ITA] - base-files base-passwd

2010-09-17 Thread David Sastre
Hello, Regarding the ITA of these packages, and the proposed patches, I have some thoughts to share and discuss before I repackage them. 1 http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-04/msg00521.html case sensitivity of system32 dir (win7 and vista) 2 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-02/msg00503.html

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64 (32-bit)

2010-09-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 17 04:17, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 9/16/2010 9:38 AM, JonY wrote: > > I have uploaded the 32bit toolchain, I hope there are no thinkos when > > adapting the cygport files. > > All packages rebuild from source ok. Packaging looks good; I used them > to build a working xz and liblzma with

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64 (32-bit)

2010-09-17 Thread JonY
On 9/17/2010 16:17, Charles Wilson wrote: On 9/16/2010 9:38 AM, JonY wrote: I have uploaded the 32bit toolchain, I hope there are no thinkos when adapting the cygport files. All packages rebuild from source ok. Packaging looks good; I used them to build a working xz and liblzma with no troubl

Re: New package: mingw64-i686-headers-1.0b_svn3433-1

2010-09-17 Thread JonY
Sorry, wrong list, please ignore.

New package: mingw64-i686-headers-1.0b_svn3433-1

2010-09-17 Thread JonY
Version 1.0b_svn3433-1 of "mingw64-i686-headers" has been uploaded. mingw64-i686-headers contains headers for Windows development. This package is specifically for the 32bit target toolchain. *** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO *** If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-ann

Re: [ITP] Onigurama-5.9.2

2010-09-17 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Ven 17/9/10, David Sastre ha scritto: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:12:48PM > > > > David, > > I guess you are using a patched version of s-lang, > > but your source is not reachable > > > >  cygport slang-2.2.2-1.cygport almostall > > >>> Preparing slang-2.2.2-1 > > *** ERROR: Cannot find s

Re: [ITP] Onigurama-5.9.2

2010-09-17 Thread David Sastre
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:12:48PM +, Marco Atzeri wrote: > --- Gio 16/9/10, David Sastre ha scritto: > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:08:54AM > > +, Marco Atzeri wrote: > > > Hi > > > thinking about packaging slrn I decided to start > > > from its dependency > > > > > > Oniguruma -> S-l

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64 (32-bit)

2010-09-17 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/16/2010 9:38 AM, JonY wrote: > I have uploaded the 32bit toolchain, I hope there are no thinkos when > adapting the cygport files. All packages rebuild from source ok. Packaging looks good; I used them to build a working xz and liblzma with no trouble. genini is happy with the setup.hints (