Re: [ITP] mingw-w64

2010-07-02 Thread Andy Koppe
On 3 July 2010 03:07, Charles Wilson wrote: >> Is mingw64 already part of a major Linux distribution? Otherwise it >> needs five votes from Cygwin maintainers. > > AFAICT, mingw64 is "the" mingw cross compiler provided by fedora. Great. >> Finally, I'm not sure what the conclusion was about which

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64

2010-07-02 Thread Charles Wilson
I am a little surprised that you got this to work simply by passing --prefix=/opt/mingw64/... and a few other flags. Last time I looked closely, cygport assumed /usr in quite a few places. Maybe that's changed; if so, cool! On 7/2/2010 1:29 AM, JonY wrote: > mingw64-tc64-headers: ... > category:

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64

2010-07-02 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/2/2010 1:41 PM, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 2 July 2010 08:17, JonY wrote: >> OK to upload if packaging is fine, no changes needed. > > Great to see mingw64 coming to Cygwin, but I think the upload should > wait until Cygwin gcc maintainer Dave Korn has had a chance to comment > on this. I agree.

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64

2010-07-02 Thread NightStrike
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Andy Koppe wrote: > Is mingw64 already part of a major Linux distribution? Otherwise it > needs five votes from Cygwin maintainers. Ubuntu, Debian, and Fedora. > Also, are you sure that gcc-4.6 is sufficiently stable for release, > i.e. that there won't be any mor

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64

2010-07-02 Thread Andy Koppe
On 2 July 2010 08:17, JonY wrote: > OK to upload if packaging is fine, no changes needed. Great to see mingw64 coming to Cygwin, but I think the upload should wait until Cygwin gcc maintainer Dave Korn has had a chance to comment on this. Is mingw64 already part of a major Linux distribution? Oth

Re: [ITA] cyrus-sasl

2010-07-02 Thread David Rothenberger
On 7/2/2010 1:34 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 30 08:14, David Rothenberger wrote: >> I would like to adopt cyrus-sasl. It is listed as orphaned and >> Gareth Pearce recently indicated he was not planning to repackage >> it.[1] > > Thanks for taking over. Packaging looks good to me, just t

Re: [ITA] cyrus-sasl

2010-07-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 30 08:14, David Rothenberger wrote: > I would like to adopt cyrus-sasl. It is listed as orphaned and > Gareth Pearce recently indicated he was not planning to repackage > it.[1] Thanks for taking over. Packaging looks good to me, just the setup.hint files... > libsasl2.hint > ---

Re: [RFU] subversion-1.6.12-2

2010-07-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 1 13:44, David Rothenberger wrote: > This release is linked against libdb4.5 instead of libdb4.2. > > Please delete 1.6.11-1 and leave 1.6.12-1 as the previous version. > > wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ > http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/subversion/setup.hint \ > > htt

Re: [RFU] libaprutil1-1.3.9-3

2010-07-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 1 13:39, David Rothenberger wrote: > This release updates from libdb4.2 to libdb4.5. > > Please leave 1.3.9-2 as previous and remove any older versions. > > wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ > > http://home.comcast.net/~david.rothenberger/cygwin/libaprutil1/aprutil1/aprutil1-1.3.9-3.tar.bz2 >

Re: [ITP] mingw-w64

2010-07-02 Thread JonY
On 7/2/2010 14:38, JonY wrote: I forgot to mention, don't upload GCC first, I need to confirm the nature of the gcc bug with Kai. Some GCC headers are needlessly shadowing the system headers. OK to upload if packaging is fine, no changes needed.