Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread JonY
On 1/24/2010 15:03, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 03:51:12PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Dave Korn wrote: On 23/01/2010 19:02, Christopher Faylor wrote: On 1/23/2010 21:51, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: mingw-w64 is a fork of mingw to support

Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread NightStrike
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > So, follow-on question:  Can we have one toolchain which targets both > 32-bit and 64-bit?  It is certainly possible to do that on linux with > a -m32 and -m64 option.  Is it possible to do this with mingw? It's possible to do that with

[RFU] plotutils-2.6-2 (was [ITA] plotutils)

2010-01-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Sab 23/1/10, Charles Wilson ha scritto: > Marco Atzeri wrote: > > as Corinna said, we are starting a PACman action. > > > > The packages are cygwinport ones, courtesy of Yaakov. > > > Just a version bump. > > > > plotutils-devel and plotutils-doc are obsoleted > > > > the development pac

Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 03:51:12PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Dave Korn wrote: >> On 23/01/2010 19:02, Christopher Faylor wrote: On 1/23/2010 21:51, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> mingw-w64 is a fork of mingw to >> support both win32 and win64. It'll o

Re: RFU] octave-3.2.4-1

2010-01-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Dom 24/1/10, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) ha scritto: > On 23/01/2010 00:18, Marco Atzeri > wrote: > > new upstream version, just bugfix > > Done.  Can 3.2.2-1 be deleted? > > > Yaakov > yes

Re: [RFU] qrupdate-1.1.0-1

2010-01-23 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 23/01/2010 00:22, Marco Atzeri wrote: libqrupdate-devel/setup.hint upset: *** setup.ini: warning - package libqrupdate-devel requires non-existent package libqrupdate_0 I made the obvious fix on sourceware; please fix your local copy so this doesn't happen again. Yaakov

Re: [RFU] cppcheck-1.40-1

2010-01-23 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 23/01/2010 21:51, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.40-1.tar.bz2 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.40-1-src.tar.bz2 Done. Which of 1.34-1, 1.35-1, or 1.39-1 should be kept as previous? Yaakov

Re: RFU] octave-3.2.4-1

2010-01-23 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 23/01/2010 00:18, Marco Atzeri wrote: new upstream version, just bugfix Done. Can 3.2.2-1 be deleted? Yaakov

Re: [RFU] qrupdate-1.1.0-1

2010-01-23 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 23/01/2010 00:22, Marco Atzeri wrote: new upstream version, functionality extension Done; 1.0.1-1 kept as previous. Yaakov

[RFU] cppcheck-1.40-1

2010-01-23 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Please upload: --- wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=3 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.40-1.tar.bz2 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/cppcheck/cppcheck-1.40-1-src.tar.bz2 --- Thank you, Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org

Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread JonY
On 1/24/2010 04:51, Charles Wilson wrote: Dave Korn wrote: On 23/01/2010 19:02, Christopher Faylor wrote: On 1/23/2010 21:51, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: mingw-w64 is a fork of mingw to support both win32 and win64. It'll obviously be setup as a cross compiler o

Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
> From a policy standpoint...the mingw community is split, and while there > has been talk recently concerning reunification, that's all it has been: > talk.  The issues appear to be both personal and technical, from my > interested but only marginally involved viewpoint: > > Do we want to choose s

Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread Charles Wilson
Dave Korn wrote: > On 23/01/2010 19:02, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On 1/23/2010 21:51, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > mingw-w64 is a fork of mingw to > support both win32 and win64. It'll obviously be setup as a cross > compiler on Cygwin. > >> Does thi

Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread Dave Korn
On 23/01/2010 19:02, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On 1/23/2010 21:51, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: mingw-w64 is a fork of mingw to support both win32 and win64. It'll obviously be setup as a cross compiler on Cygwin. > Does this mean that these are all

Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:47:17PM +0800, JonY wrote: >On 1/23/2010 21:51, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>> mingw-w64 is a fork of mingw to >>> support both win32 and win64. It'll obviously be setup as a cross >>> compiler on Cygwin. >>> >>> I would like to get some in

Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread JonY
On 1/23/2010 21:51, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: mingw-w64 is a fork of mingw to support both win32 and win64. It'll obviously be setup as a cross compiler on Cygwin. I would like to get some inputs from Cygwin maintainers before I start packaging; mainly because mi

Re: Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
> mingw-w64 is a fork of mingw to > support both win32 and win64. It'll obviously be setup as a cross > compiler on Cygwin. > > I would like to get some inputs from Cygwin maintainers before I > start packaging; mainly because mingw-w64 is a fairly large > toolch

Need input on packaging mingw-w64 for Cygwin

2010-01-23 Thread JonY
Hi, mingw-w64 is a fork of mingw to support both win32 and win64. It'll obviously be setup as a cross compiler on Cygwin. I would like to get some inputs from Cygwin maintainers before I start packaging; mainly because mingw-w64 is a fairly large toolchain pac