Please upload: clisp-2.41-2

2007-04-05 Thread Reini Urban
http://rurban.xarch.at/software/cygwin/release/clisp/setup.hint http://rurban.xarch.at/software/cygwin/release/clisp/clisp-2.41-2.tar.bz2 http://rurban.xarch.at/software/cygwin/release/clisp/clisp-2.41-2.src.tar.bz2 Keep clisp-2.41-1 as prev and delete clisp-2.39-2 -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.

Re: Please Upload: mingw-runtime-3.12-2

2007-04-05 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Sorry but I don't think we're there yet. If you're going to put these in their own section then I don't think they need the mingw- prefix. I was only thinking that would be necessary if the manpages were going to be living in /usr/share/man/man1. If they are going into their own section then I'

Re: Please Upload: mingw-runtime-3.12-2

2007-04-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:49:02PM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >As discussed, I've modified the man page locations as follows: > >$ tar jtvf mingw-runtime-3.12-2.tar.bz2 | grep man >drwxr-xr-x csutclif/Administrators 0 2007-04-05 14:35:49 usr/share/man/ >drwxr-xr-x csutclif/Administrators

Please Upload: mingw-runtime-3.12-2

2007-04-05 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
As discussed, I've modified the man page locations as follows: $ tar jtvf mingw-runtime-3.12-2.tar.bz2 | grep man drwxr-xr-x csutclif/Administrators 0 2007-04-05 14:35:49 usr/share/man/ drwxr-xr-x csutclif/Administrators 0 2007-04-05 14:35:55 usr/share/man/mingw/ -rw-r--r-- csutclif/Adm

Re: [Packaging error] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw-runtime-3.12-1

2007-04-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 5 11:15, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Given that cygwin's documentation is so sparse currently (always looking for > volunteers to correct that situation, btw), it seems a shame to add a barrier > to any available documentation, even if it is for MinGW. We could use the man-pages package fr

Re: [Packaging error] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw-runtime-3.12-1

2007-04-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:35:08AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:02:30PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>On Apr 5 08:11, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >Just let me know where I should put them (

Re: [Packaging error] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw-runtime-3.12-1

2007-04-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:02:30PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>On Apr 5 08:11, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>> >> >Just let me know where I should put them (or I can remove them from >>> >> >the binary distribution, as I mentione

Re: [Packaging error] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw-runtime-3.12-1

2007-04-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:02:30PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Apr 5 08:11, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >> >Just let me know where I should put them (or I can remove them from >> >> >the binary distribution, as I mentioned) and I'll gladly put together >> >> >a new release. >> >> >> >> It sou

Re: [Packaging error] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw-runtime-3.12-1

2007-04-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 5 08:11, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > >> >Just let me know where I should put them (or I can remove them from > >> >the binary distribution, as I mentioned) and I'll gladly put together > >> >a new release. > >> > >> It sounds like Corinna is in agreement that they should go in the > >> standar

Re: [Packaging error] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw-runtime-3.12-1

2007-04-05 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
> >Just let me know where I should put them (or I can remove them from > >the binary distribution, as I mentioned) and I'll gladly put together > >a new release. > > It sounds like Corinna is in agreement that they should go in the > standard location with a mingw- prefix. Not exactly. I'd prefe

Re: [Packaging error] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw-runtime-3.12-1

2007-04-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 4 21:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 02:59:47PM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > >>> Anyway, here's a thought that might be useful (unfortunately it seems to > >>> need a change to man to work nicely*); rather than prefixing pages, add > >>> them to a 'mingw' section.