Max Bowsher wrote:
> (1) I'm linking to postgresql. PHP without any SQL database interface
> would be a bit crippled - on the other hand, this requires *everyone*
> installing PHP to install PostgreSQL. It *ought* to be able to
> modularize the dependency into a sub-package, but persuading the
> e
Max Bowsher wrote:
> Given the above caveats, do you think I should proceed with the ITP
> process, or not?
I had tought to do this ITP too, but as I'm already enough "behind
schedule" with existing packages I always delayed this to "later"...
I would obviously appreciate it.
I suggest to add FastC
On Thu, April 27, 2006 5:57 pm, Max Bowsher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I don't have much of a liking for PHP myself, but seeing the large
> quantity of people who _do_ want it, and being the apache2 maintainer, I
> feel like I ought to at least make a bit of an eff
Max Bowsher writes:
> I don't have much of a liking for PHP myself, but seeing the large
> quantity of people who _do_ want it, and being the apache2 maintainer, I
> feel like I ought to at least make a bit of an effort to make it available.
>
> So: I have prospective PHP packages building right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't have much of a liking for PHP myself, but seeing the large
quantity of people who _do_ want it, and being the apache2 maintainer, I
feel like I ought to at least make a bit of an effort to make it available.
So: I have prospective PHP packages
