Re: [ITP] netpbm-10.28

2005-08-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Yaakov S wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Due to popular request: http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/temp/netpbm/netpbm-10.28-1-src.tar.bz2 http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/temp/netpbm/netpbm-10.28-1.tar.bz2 http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/te

[ITP] netpbm-10.28

2005-08-12 Thread Yaakov S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Due to popular request: http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/temp/netpbm/netpbm-10.28-1-src.tar.bz2 http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/temp/netpbm/netpbm-10.28-1.tar.bz2 http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/temp/netpbm/setup.hin

RFR: fftw-3.0.1-1

2005-08-12 Thread James R. Phillips
Hello reviewers/uploaders, Please take a look at the proposed fftw-3.0.1-1 package files, located at: ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw/setup.hint ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw/fftw-3.0.1-1-src.tar.bz2 ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw/fftw-3.0.1-1.tar.bz2 If GTG, please upload.

RE: What package does include cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll?

2005-08-12 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Max Bowsher >Sent: 12 August 2005 16:25 > Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 03:50:44PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>> >>> Looks like there's a dependency missing then! >> >> I just added it. > > I removed it. Subversion doesn't directly depend on

Re: Proposal singular-3.0.0-1 (final directory structure)

2005-08-12 Thread Oliver Wienand
Hello, I have uploaded new packages and I must sorry about your compiling problems. With the new packages all should go right with the following sequence: cd /usr/src/singular-3.0.0-1 ./configure --without-MP --without-dl --disable-doc \ --disable-Texi2html --disable-Texinfo \

Re: What package does include cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll?

2005-08-12 Thread Max Bowsher
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 03:50:44PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: Looks like there's a dependency missing then! I just added it. I removed it. Subversion doesn't directly depend on OpenSSL. The correct fix is for libneon24 to require openssl097, not openssl. I've done t

Re: What package does include cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll?

2005-08-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 03:50:44PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Original Message >>From: Bengt-Arne Fjellner >>Sent: 12 August 2005 15:44 > >> Alexey Lyubimov skrev: >>> This dll (cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll) is missing in my >>> installation. >>> I've just installed Subversion package v1.2.0 and it >>

RE: What package does include cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll?

2005-08-12 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Bengt-Arne Fjellner >Sent: 12 August 2005 15:44 > Alexey Lyubimov skrev: >> This dll (cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll) is missing in my >> installation. >> I've just installed Subversion package v1.2.0 and it >> appeares that SVN requires this dll at the runtime. >> I tried to

Re: ITP: fftw-3.0.1

2005-08-12 Thread James R. Phillips
--- "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > >> Since the package is in SuSE and Debian, just go ahead and prepare the > >> package. But I'm wondering why it's useful to drop the single precision > >> calls. Sounds like an unnecessary restriction

Re: ITP: fftw-3.0.1

2005-08-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 11 17:55, James R. Phillips wrote: Comments welcomed. Since the package is in SuSE and Debian, just go ahead and prepare the package. But I'm wondering why it's useful to drop the single precision calls. Sounds like an unnecessary res

Re: ITP: fftw-3.0.1

2005-08-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 11 17:55, James R. Phillips wrote: Although fftw3 can be built with both single and double precision versions, octave only uses double precision, so that is all I propose to build. Only a shared library (dll) will be built; no static library will be provided. I

Re: ITP: fftw-3.0.1

2005-08-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 11 17:55, James R. Phillips wrote: > Although fftw3 can be built with both single and double precision versions, > octave only uses double precision, so that is all I propose to build. Only a > shared library (dll) will be built; no static library will be provided. I > have > verified tha