Re: [test] base-files 3.2

> Given my track record so far, Bah, given the amount of threads you participate in I think you are being too hard on yourself! > I think it would be best if someone else ok'ed these. :-) As you wish :) J.

Re: [Package Update] HTML Tidy 041206-1

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:22:06PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>File are, as usual, there: >>I've grabbed these two packages. > >I guess this counts as an upload, as the file are on the mirror? =) I suspect that you can check mirrors every bit as easily as I can. cgf

Re: [Package Update] HTML Tidy 041206-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Faylor wrote: >> File are, as usual, there: > I've grabbed these two packages. I guess this counts as an upload, as the file are on the mirror? =) I will send the announcement ASAP. Lapo - -- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509

Re: [test] base-files 3.2

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:17:47PM -, John Morrison wrote: >>>John Morrison, would you mind doing this, please? >>> >>>cgf >> >> Sheesh. You can't trust anything THAT guy says. > >lol > >> He can't even remember conversations from a month or two ago. >> >> Sorry. Never mind. >> >> You don't w

Re: [test] base-files 3.2

>>John Morrison, would you mind doing this, please? >> >>cgf > > Sheesh. You can't trust anything THAT guy says. lol > He can't even remember conversations from a month or two ago. > > Sorry. Never mind. > > You don't want me to upload this to sourceware.org, right? If you wouldn't mind castin

Re: [test] base-files 3.2

>John Morrison, would you mind doing this, please? > >cgf Sheesh. You can't trust anything THAT guy says. He can't even remember conversations from a month or two ago. Sorry. Nevemind. You don't want me to upload this to sourceware.org, right? cgf

Re: [test] base-files 3.2

> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:24:14PM -, John Morrison wrote: >>I'm *fairly* sure that all the variables that need to be escaped have >> been. >> >>The only ones that haven't should be PATH, MANPATH and INFOPATH as per a >>thread a few weeks ago. > > ? Can you point to a URL for this discussion

Re: [test] base-files 3.2

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:24:14PM -, John Morrison wrote: >I'm *fairly* sure that all the variables that need to be escaped have been. > >The only ones that haven't should be PATH, MANPATH and INFOPATH as per a >thread a few weeks ago. ? Can you point to a URL for this discussion? I can't t

[test] base-files 3.2

I'm *fairly* sure that all the variables that need to be escaped have been. The only ones that haven't should be PATH, MANPATH and INFOPATH as per a thread a few weeks ago. Anyway, if people wouldn't mind checking that I got everything...

Re: setup.exe sucks

Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:52:30PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote: BTW: There is new Conectiva packager, which should be the best, and builds out of the box. http://zorked.net/smart/FAQ.html Requires python. Works with .rpm, .deb and pkgtool files and up2date- and Conectiva-st

Re: Updated: diffstat 1.35

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:28:28AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: >New upstream release, no change to setup.hint (1.34 can stay as the >previous version). Please upload: > >http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/diffstat-1.35-1.tar.bz2 >http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/diffstat-1.35-1-src.tar.bz2 Upload

Re: setup.exe sucks

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:52:30PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote: >BTW: There is new Conectiva packager, which should be the best, >and builds out of the box. > http://zorked.net/smart/FAQ.html >Requires python. > >Works with .rpm, .deb and pkgtool files and >up2date- and Conectiva-style mirror descrip

Re: setup.exe sucks

BTW: There is new Conectiva packager, which should be the best, and builds out of the box. http://zorked.net/smart/FAQ.html Requires python. Works with .rpm, .deb and pkgtool files and up2date- and Conectiva-style mirror description formats. I don't like python that much, but I try how to convert

Updated: diffstat 1.35

New upstream release, no change to setup.hint (1.34 can stay as the previous version). Please upload: http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/diffstat-1.35-1.tar.bz2 http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/diffstat-1.35-1-src.tar.bz2 -- Someday, I might put a cute statement here. Eric Blake [E

Re: [ITP] ec-fonts-mftraced

OK, the postinstall script is cleaned up, no fonts are deleted, because I think it is not necessary. I think the packages are ready to upload now: http://www.inf.bme.hu/~berti/lilypond/release/ec-fonts-mftraced/setup.hint http://www.inf.bme.hu/~berti/lilypond/release/ec-fonts-mftraced/ec-fonts-mf

Re: setup.exe sucks

On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 15:16 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I believe that it was always Robert's intention to work towards the use > of a true package manager someday. That time is now. I can't take it > anymore. Ack. Rob -- GPG key available at: .