All,
I know somebody might get a little upset, but I believe I have a useful
patch for the generic readme file and generic-build script. In fact, I know
Igor has seen my emails on this matter, since he has commented on a couple
of items - which I have subsequently fixed.
I posted it to the main c
On 2003-12-02T15:55-0500, William A. Hoffman wrote:
) You can remove 1.8.1-1. Our idea is to always have
) the previous version be the last major release. That is
) the point where we reserve the right to break backwards
) compatibility. So, someone might need 1.6.7, but they
) should never need
On 2003-11-29T21:41-0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
) http://www.fruitbat.org/Cygwin/suite3270/suite3270-3.2.20-1.tar.bz2
) http://www.fruitbat.org/Cygwin/suite3270/suite3270-3.2.20-1-src.tar.bz2
) http://www.fruitbat.org/Cygwin/suite3270/setup.hint.suite3270
) http://www.fruitbat.org/Cygwin/suite327
You can remove 1.8.1-1. Our idea is to always have
the previous version be the last major release. That is
the point where we reserve the right to break backwards
compatibility. So, someone might need 1.6.7, but they
should never need 1.8.1.
Thanks.
-Bill
>The setup.hint lists 1.8.2-1 as c
Corinna wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:26:24AM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
That being said, I will list you as voting pro for suite3270. The suite3270
proposal is now only one vote away, as you stated.
No, it's not. I voted already pro inclusion, right after Peter's
first proposal.
I say pro,
On 2003-12-02T12:17-0500, William A. Hoffman wrote:
) Did that change at some point? We have been using the
) same script for creating the cmake release on cygwin for
) over a year now and have not changed it. I can not find the docs,
) but I have some memory of making those changes specifically
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:36:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Is it safe to rely on /tmp already existing when the postinstall
> >script runs?
>
> I see from the source that setup.exe creates tmp. If it doesn't exist
> when postinstall scripts are being run, tha
#/etc/postinstall/emacro.sh copies /etc/skel/.emacs &
/etc/skel/emacs/**/* to $HOME
What happens if there's more than one user?
Personally, I think that the /etc/skel/.emacs and
/etc/skel/emacs/**/* should be /etc/defaults/etc/skel/.emacs
and /etc/defaults/etc/emacs/**/* respectively and
/etc/po
Did that change at some point? We have been using the
same script for creating the cmake release on cygwin for
over a year now and have not changed it. I can not find the docs,
but I have some memory of making those changes specifically
for cygwin.
Anyway, 1.8.1-1 is like that as well. So, why
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:36:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Is it safe to rely on /tmp already existing when the postinstall
>script runs?
I see from the source that setup.exe creates tmp. If it doesn't exist
when postinstall scripts are being run, that's clearly a bug. I don't
think we s
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:55:11AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:23:28PM -, John Morrison wrote:
As per the thread "[RFC] Globally creating a user and a group
"root"" I've modified the base-passwd packa
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:55:11AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:23:28PM -, John Morrison wrote:
> >> As per the thread "[RFC] Globally creating a user and a group "root""
> >> I've modified the base-passwd packaged to remove user and grou
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:23:28PM -, John Morrison wrote:
>> As per the thread "[RFC] Globally creating a user and a group "root""
>> I've modified the base-passwd packaged to remove user and group which
>> match the pattern ":S-1-1-0:" and ensure that there's a group
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:23:28PM -, John Morrison wrote:
> As per the thread "[RFC] Globally creating a user and a group "root""
> I've modified the base-passwd packaged to remove user and group which
> match the pattern ":S-1-1-0:" and ensure that there's a group
> "root:S-1-5-32-544:0:".
>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:26:24AM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
> That being said, I will list you as voting pro for suite3270. The suite3270
> proposal is now only one vote away, as you stated.
No, it's not. I voted already pro inclusion, right after Peter's
first proposal.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vi
15 matches
Mail list logo
