Re: [ITP] d 1.2.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit wrote: > Another question, d shows the timestamps in GMT, not respecting my > local TZ settings as ls does, can this be configured? (I haven't > studied the docs completly yet, so forgive me if it is included > there): I passed this on to the u

RE: Pending Packages List, 2003-10-08

> > Daniel Reed wrote: > > >ITP: graphviz > > HOLD-UPS: Not enough votes (need 2 more). No package, nothing to > review! > > > > > I use it to create GPG trust relationsships graphs.. I guess it wuold be > handy to have on (standard) Cygwin. > Aye. Additional hold-ups for this one should incl

Re: Pending Packages List, 2003-10-08

Daniel Reed wrote: ITP: graphviz HOLD-UPS: Not enough votes (need 2 more). No package, nothing to review! I use it to create GPG trust relationsships graphs.. I guess it wuold be handy to have on (standard) Cygwin. Aye. ITP: subversion 0.30-1 HOLD-UPS: Not enough votes (need 2 more). No p

Re: Pending Packages List, 2003-10-08

On 08.10.2003 20:56, Daniel Reed wrote: === Pending Packages List === Waiting for review: tcm ploticus sgrep libsigsegv suite3270 distcc Waiting for vote[s]: ploticus sgrep l

Re: setup.exe don't stops & memory leak?

On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 06:53, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hallo, > That was with the > setup.exe version I checked out today from mirrors.rcn.net. Which could be any version. What was the version number? Also, your best bet to fix this is to build a debug version and break into in when this happens

setup.exe don't stops & memory leak?

Hallo, Today I saw the following: setup.exe runs to install several packages, it stucks and I saw that there was no space left at the hardisk. I clicked on the 'Abbrechen' (probably 'Exit' or 'Finish' in english) button, and started to delete all entries in the /usr/doc, man, info, /usr/share/doc

aye vote for libsigsegv

I support inclusion of libsigsegv into cygwin. -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k When you are arguing with an idiot, your opponent is doi

Pending Packages List, 2003-10-08

This is the list of pending packages as of Wednesday, October 8, 2003. ** PACKAGE PROPOSERS ** Please verify these fields ** Package: The name and version of the package as it will appear in setup. Proposal: Files that will be uploaded to sources.redhat.com unmodified. HOLD-UPS: What you need to

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:05:23PM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote: > No, I have not. I will remove them when 1.8.2-1 comes out if that > is OK. Actually I asked Daniel :-) Corinna > > -Bill > > At 12:38 PM 10/8/2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:33:06PM -0400, Dani

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

On 2003-10-08T18:38+0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: ) On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:33:06PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote: ) > On 2003-10-08T11:58-0400, William A. Hoffman wrote: ) > ) We just tried installing prev from setup, and it worked fine on ) > ) a cygwin 1.5.x machine. So, we are going to leave it

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

No, I have not. I will remove them when 1.8.2-1 comes out if that is OK. -Bill At 12:38 PM 10/8/2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:33:06PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote: >> On 2003-10-08T11:58-0400, William A. Hoffman wrote: >> ) We just tried installing prev from setup, and

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:33:06PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote: > On 2003-10-08T11:58-0400, William A. Hoffman wrote: > ) We just tried installing prev from setup, and it worked fine on > ) a cygwin 1.5.x machine. So, we are going to leave it the way it > ) is. You can remove 1.6.7-2 if you want. >

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

On 2003-10-08T11:58-0400, William A. Hoffman wrote: ) We just tried installing prev from setup, and it worked fine on ) a cygwin 1.5.x machine. So, we are going to leave it the way it ) is. You can remove 1.6.7-2 if you want. Done. I have removed cmake-1.6.7-2. -rw-r--r--1 546 Oct 8

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

We just tried installing prev from setup, and it worked fine on a cygwin 1.5.x machine. So, we are going to leave it the way it is. You can remove 1.6.7-2 if you want. I will go ahead and announce cmake 1.8.1-1 release in a few hours. Thanks. -Bill >It's your decision. Changing the setup.h

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

I'm suggesting you remove "prev" and "curr" from setup.hint altogether, and keep whichever version you'd like as "prev". upset should be smart enough to figure out which version is prev and which is curr. Igor On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, William A. Hoffman wrote: > I am not sure I understand wha

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:35:56AM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote: > 1.6.7-2 was the test release for cygwin 1.5.x. It was never > made the current release for cmake. I suppose we could go > either way. The only difference between 1.6.7-1 and 1.6.7-2 is > that one is built with cygwin 1.3.x a

[ITP] distcc - without company disclaimer

2.11.1 has just been released... > Original from > > This is a first attempt. It still needs quite a lot of setup to > use. I'm working on the postinstall which will do more of the work, > but I thought this might be of use to some folk as it stands. > > J. > > sdesc: "

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

I am not sure I understand what test has to do with prev and curr. The way I look at prev and curr is that if someone upgrades to the current cmake, but there is a compatibility problem with their project, then can go back to prev. Unless I am missing something if I leave it the way it is, then p

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

If there's no "test", "prev" and "curr" become redundant. So you still have to change setup.hint, and it's your choice on how to proceed. IMO, since cygwin-1.3.22-1 is still available on the mirrors (though not in setup.ini), we should keep 1.3-compatible packages around... Either that, or remov

Re: antiword-0.34

Hi Igor, >>> One small problem I noticed (and this may be an upstream one) is that I'm >>> getting a "Syntax error in: '0x98 #UNDEFINED'" error when viewing a Word97 >>> file with the cp1251.txt mapping. The document then displays ok. >>> A "grep UNDEFINED *.txt" in usr/share/antiword shows >>>

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

1.6.7-2 was the test release for cygwin 1.5.x. It was never made the current release for cmake. I suppose we could go either way. The only difference between 1.6.7-1 and 1.6.7-2 is that one is built with cygwin 1.3.x and one is built with 1.5.x. So, I guess we have two choices: 1. remove 1.6.

Re: antiword-0.34

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Igor wrote about: > > http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1.tar.bz2 > http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/setup.hint > > [...] > > > One small problem I noticed

Re: antiword-0.34

On 2003-10-08T12:33+0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: ) > Otherwise the package is good to go, IMO. ) > Igor ) Hey, Daniel, there were three votes and a positive review, lets push it ) on the mirrors;-) Just went to push and the last check didn't find a Cygwin-specific README. Looks like the pa

Re: antiword-0.34

Igor wrote about: http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1-src.tar.bz2 http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1.tar.bz2 http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/setup.hint [...] > One small problem I noticed (and this may be an upstream one) is that I'm > getting a "

RE: [ITP][update] distcc

Morrison, John wrote: 2.11.1 has just been released... > Original from > > This is a first attempt. It still needs quite a lot of setup to > use. I'm working on the postinstall which will do more of the work, > but I thought this might be of use to some folk as it sta

Re: CMake 1.8.1-1 ready

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:30:27PM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote: > ftp://www.cmake.org/pub/cmake/cygwin/setup.hint > ftp://www.cmake.org/pub/cmake/cygwin/cmake-1.8.1-1.tar.bz2 > ftp://www.cmake.org/pub/cmake/cygwin/cmake-1.8.1-1-src.tar.bz2 > > # CMake setup.hint file for cygwin setup.exe progr