Robert,
I will do this later tonight, since it will require a full uninstall
before I can rerun setup.exe. Can you provide a debug version of that
version of setup since I can't get &%$@#! gcc-3.1.1/gcc-2 to build
setup.exe and I don't have time to reinstall the old gcc/mingw stuff.
Thanks
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Robert,
>
> When running setup-2.259.2.4 for the first time on Windows 98SE/ME/2K,
> setup will page fault when the user cycles the install type in chooser
> from "Default" to "Install". It produces no log file, so I can't
> really provide any more information than th
If you run setup under DebugView, or a similar tool, is any output
created?
Can you get me a stackdump?
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
> Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 8:46 AM
> To: Cygwin-Apps
> Subject: [setup-2
Robert,
I believe Unisys have lost their patent. They have removed their
webpage regarding this issue and are no longer seeking damages. Just
thought I'd FYI. In any event...
Cheers,
Nicholas
Robert Collins wrote:
>What about
>ldesc: "programs to convert GIF images
> These are some progra
Robert,
When running setup-2.259.2.4 for the first time on Windows 98SE/ME/2K,
setup will page fault when the user cycles the install type in chooser
from "Default" to "Install". It produces no log file, so I can't really
provide any more information than this report. I have verified this on
What about
ldesc: "programs to convert GIF images
These are some programs that use libungif to convert images.
The libungif library is a specially modified version of giflib which
is free of the Unisys LZW patent. It can read all GIFs, but only
write uncompressed GIFs."
(Courtesy of debian
Nicholas Wourms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> @tetex-beta
>>
> ^^
> I assume this is supposed to be @tetex-base?
No, the current package is tetex-beta. I propose to do a new, dummy
release that depends on the new tetex-bin.
> Sounds good to me [though you might considier using
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Okay, while I think this package should be added to the
distro, I
> really dislike the way it has been ported (sorry Lapo).
>
> Steven's 'mkdll.sh' script is just plain wrong. libungif
is a
> libtoolized package, you should just relibtoolize.
>
> I've had I versi
