Re[2]: [PATCH] Re: Setup.exe 2.249.2.4 crashing under Windows NT 4.0 SP6

2002-07-03 Thread Pavel Tsekov
RC> I've applied this to HEAD and 2002-07. This evening I'll get 2002-06 done RC> and release a new setup.exe Robert, have you checked the other two patches I've sent to cygwin-apps ? I think that at least the one for compress_gz.cc or a modified version of it should be checked in before a new se

Re: gcc 3.1 update

2002-07-03 Thread Steven Whatley
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I just ran the cygwin test suite with executables compiled with > gcc/g++ 3.1.1. Boom! You should have waited until tomorrow to set off the fireworks. :) Later, Steven

Re: Setup: capturing postinstall output

2002-07-03 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Bradey Honsinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 5:55 AM Subject: RE: Setup: capturing postinstall output > Does this seem like a good (or bad) way to go to anyone else (particularly > Robert)? I didn't expect my hac

gcc 3.1 update

2002-07-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
I just ran the cygwin test suite with executables compiled with gcc/g++ 3.1.1. Boom! So, I still have some more work to do before releasing this. cgf

RE: Setup: capturing postinstall output

2002-07-03 Thread Bradey Honsinger
Does this seem like a good (or bad) way to go to anyone else (particularly Robert)? I didn't expect my hacked-up patch to get accepted right off the bat, but this was a bit of a problem for me, so I'm willing to put more work into it if I get some feedback. - Bradey -Original Message- Fr

Re: --enable-auto-import extension

2002-07-03 Thread Charles Wilson
egor duda wrote: > Someone suggested that one can do 'cmp -i 150 old.dll new.dll', or > whatever offset timestamp is located at. > > Ok, i've finalized patch and test. I suppose i have a copyright > assignment with FSF for this changes to get incorporated into official > sources. As far as i un

Re: libtool-CVS and Cygwin [WAS: Need a teTeX-beta maintainer]

2002-07-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Umm,, yeah -- all of the autotools must be installed under the same > prefix. > If you want to do it your way, you'd be better off installing all > three of your newly built packages under > "--prefix=~/usr/pkg/autotool-cvs/" So, yes, that's what I d

Re: libtool-CVS and Cygwin [WAS: Need a teTeX-beta maintainer]

2002-07-03 Thread Charles Wilson
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >*) Autoconf-CVS is a bit broken, in that it only works if Libtool > is installed under the same prefix: installing updates of > packages as I tend to do, with prefixes like: > > ~/usr/pkg/autoconf-cvs > ~/usr/pkg/libtool-cvs > >

Re: rebase / STL set patch

2002-07-03 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Jason Tishler wrote: >Nicholas, > >On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:17:12PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > >>Jason Tishler wrote: >> >>>I have also updated my completely stand-alone rebase (*) to copy the >>>image file before attempting to rebase and to skip it if corruption is >>>detected. I hope to

Re: [maybe-ITP] FreeCiv for X

2002-07-03 Thread Stipe Tolj
> I've been browsing the FreeCiv site, some time ago - I remember that > in the ports section I red something about droping the cygwin version > in favour of the native Win32 one. I don't remember the exact reason > though. the reason was (some time ago) because of the X-server need for the cygwi

Re: rebase / STL set patch

2002-07-03 Thread Jason Tishler
Nicholas, On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:17:12PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: > >I have also updated my completely stand-alone rebase (*) to copy the > >image file before attempting to rebase and to skip it if corruption is > >detected. I hope to release this version RSN. Ul

libtool-CVS and Cygwin [WAS: Need a teTeX-beta maintainer]

2002-07-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Nicholas Wourms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>Btw: I've been putting quite some time in getting a fine guile release >>> to cross build for Cygwin, because this has a high priority for >>> me. But as yet I can't get a shared version linked. It seems I >>> need the latest autotools

Re: vmstat

2002-07-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 10:48:13AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:21:42PM +0100, Chris January wrote: >> > > Ok. Do you have any thoughts on where I should put ps.exe and kill.exe? >> > >> > >> > I ended up renaming 'clear.exe' from the ncurses dist to 'clearn.exe' to >

Re: Re[2]: new branch tagged for setup

2002-07-03 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Pavel Tsekov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It seems to be gone :) Yes, ermm, cough, cough. I had a bug in my new code, which I was still tracking down here. It's fixed now, in CVS, and a new snapshot is on the way. > Since t

[PATCH] setup.exe & problem with compress_gz destructor

2002-07-03 Thread Pavel Tsekov
The attached patch should be self explanatory :) The problem is in 2.249.2.4, all recent versions and CVS head. I dont't know when it was introduce but maybe it was there from the very begging. 2002-06-03 Pavel Tsekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * compress_gz.cc (compress_gz::construct):

[PATCH suggestion] Can't open null for reading when installing from local directory

2002-07-03 Thread Pavel Tsekov
The following code is wrong - choose.cc, default_trust (): default_trust (HWND h, trusts trust) { chooser->deftrust = trust; packagedb db; for (size_t n = 1; n <= db.packages.number (); n++) { packagemeta & pkg = *db.packages[n]; if (pkg.installed || pkg.Categories

Re: vmstat

2002-07-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:21:42PM +0100, Chris January wrote: > > > Ok. Do you have any thoughts on where I should put ps.exe and kill.exe? > > > > > > I ended up renaming 'clear.exe' from the ncurses dist to 'clearn.exe' to > > avoid conflicts with the 'clear' package. (In ncurses, 'clear.exe'

Re: Updated db-2 packages ready for upload

2002-07-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:03:00PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Hello All, > > It was recently discovered that the db-2 package had been compiled with > some shm symbols (which shouldn't have been there). A super big thanks > to Steve O'brien for catching this! Well I just recompiled it wi

Re[2]: new branch tagged for setup

2002-07-03 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello Robert, Wednesday, July 03, 2002, 12:35:00 AM, you wrote: >> I'll test it and report if the bug is still there. Then you may want >> to give me some clues where to start looking for possible causes of >> the bug. RC> Just knowing it's there will be a help for now :}. It seems to be gone