x3270 is still an active package
run /etc/postinstall/x3270.sh from bash and if you have no error
rename it as /etc/postinstall/x3270.sh.done
Regards
Marco
All the x3270.sh file did was define a few shell variables. It didn't
fail and the rename worked.
Thank you.
--
Chris Jo
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, mark.pau...@verizon.com wrote:
Greetings, Mark, Marco & Chris (original poster),
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:37:36 +
From: mark.pau...@verizon.com
To: Marco Atzeri ,
"cygwin@cygwin.com"
Subject: RE: [E] Re: x3270
-Original Message-
On 4/1
-Original Message-
> On 4/15/2018 2:48 AM, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Not sure when this happened but I now have a complaint for cygwin on
> > exit about x3270.sh returning exit code 1. I found it listed in
> > /etc/setup/install.db and rem
On 4/15/2018 2:48 AM, Chris Johnson wrote:
Hi.
Not sure when this happened but I now have a complaint for cygwin on
exit about x3270.sh returning exit code 1. I found it listed in
/etc/setup/install.db and remove it. No joy. Do I recall the x3270 is
defunct? Either way, how do I get rid
Hi.
Not sure when this happened but I now have a complaint for cygwin on
exit about x3270.sh returning exit code 1. I found it listed in
/etc/setup/install.db and remove it. No joy. Do I recall the x3270 is
defunct? Either way, how do I get rid of this error. It's annoying.
T
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Marco Atzeri wrote:
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:56:23 +0100
From: Marco Atzeri
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Package x3270 installation error: startx crashes
On 20/12/2016 22:21, SERGEY BULDYREV wrote:
Dear All,
In November 2016 I tried several times to install
On 20/12/2016 22:21, SERGEY BULDYREV wrote:
Dear All,
In November 2016 I tried several times to install Cygwin 2.6.0 from
the official cite setup-x86_64.exe form various mirrors. Installation always
ended with an error:Package: _/x3270
x3270.sh exit code 1
can you try to run
Dear All,
In November 2016 I tried several times to install Cygwin 2.6.0 from
the official cite setup-x86_64.exe form various mirrors. Installation always
ended with an error:Package: _/x3270
x3270.sh exit code 1
I am using windows 10 on a Dell Laptop XPS 15.
When I tried
015. (But by itself, current
state of cygwin does not install; see below!!!)
(D) Everything would install fine now (hurray!!!) except:
x3270.sh exit code 1
opendir: No such file or directory
Fix: mkdir D:\Programs\cygwin\usr\s
Kenneth Wolcott writes:
> Every time I update 64bit Cygwin refresh the following happens:
>
> Package: _/Unknown package
> x3270.sh exit code 1
>
> Just curious, is this an obsolete/orphaned package?
Neither. You seem to have had that package installed at one time, but
t
Hi All;
Every time I update 64bit Cygwin refresh the following happens:
Package: _/Unknown package
x3270.sh exit code 1
Just curious, is this an obsolete/orphaned package?
Thanks,
Ken Wolcott
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, David Stacey wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:17:10 +0100
From: David Stacey
Subject: x3270 post install script fails
Greetings, David,
The x3270 package performs the following in its post install script:
FONTDIR=/usr/share/fonts
ENCODINGSDIR=$FONTDIR/encodings
The x3270 package performs the following in its post install script:
FONTDIR=/usr/share/fonts
ENCODINGSDIR=$FONTDIR/encodings
MKFONTDIR=/usr/bin/mkfontdir
$MKFONTDIR -e $ENCODINGSDIR $FONTDIR/misc
This fails because the directory '/usr/share/fonts/encodings' no long
.tar.bz2
c3270-3.3.15ga9-1.tar.bz2
pr3287-3.3.15ga9-1.tar.bz2
s3270-3.3.15ga9-1.tar.bz2
tcl3270-3.3.15ga9-1.tar.bz2
x3270-3.3.15ga9-1.tar.bz2
NEWS
(From the release notes: http://x3270.bgp.nu/documentation-relnotes.html
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:56:52 +0200
From: Dr. Volker Zell
Subject: [Packaging error] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: suite3270-3.3.15ga8-1,
c3270-3.3.15ga8-1, pr3287-3.3.15ga8-1, s3270-3.3.15ga8-1,
tcl3270-3.3.15ga8-1, x3270-3.3.15ga8-1
Peter
2-bit and 64-bit
Cygwin. The
> updated packages are as follows:
> suite3270-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
> c3270-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
> pr3287-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
> s3270-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
> tcl3270-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
> x3270-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
The man
.tar.bz2
c3270-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
pr3287-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
s3270-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
tcl3270-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
x3270-3.3.15ga8-1.tar.bz2
NEWS
In addition to a code refresh, these packages have been built with the
latest openssl (1.0.0), tcl-tk (8.5) and ncurses (10) dependencies.
(From
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 24 21:31, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Hi
The binaries from the following packages are missing the .exe extension.
c3270-3.3.4p7-2
pr3287-3.3.4p7-2
s3270-3.3
On Feb 24 21:31, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> >
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>The binaries from the following packages are missing the .exe extension.
> >>
> >> c3270-3.3.4p7-2
> >> pr3287-3.3.4p7-2
> >> s3270-3.3.4p7-2
> >
Not a perfect fix, but
it catches most of these cases.
I considered something like this, but it was simple enough to fix it with
a hack :-)
x3270, like many traditional X based applications, uses "imake"[...]
I'm sorry to hear that. Imake isn't so much traditional as dow
n
environmental variable override :-).
FWIW cygport's postinstall strip stage now looks for executable files
without any extension and checks to see if they are possibly .exe's, in
which case they are stripped (causing the suffix to be added). Not a
perfect fix, but it catches most
quicky fixup release. Instead,
I've taken the less intrusive (and arguable magical) approach of adding
"-s" to the install options for program installs (done handily via an
environmental variable override :-).
The following package is using the wrong directory for it'
ge is using the wrong directory for it's man page:
x3270-3.3.4p7-2
/usr/man/man1/x3270.1 -> /usr/share/man/man1/x3270.1
Documentation from all the above packages should go in unversioned
directories (also for suite3270-3.3.4p7-2).
HmmThat's a change from before too. Ok, I&#x
Hi
The binaries from the following packages are missing the .exe extension.
c3270-3.3.4p7-2
pr3287-3.3.4p7-2
s3270-3.3.4p7-2
tcl3270-3.3.4p7-2
The following package is using the wrong directory for it's man page:
x3270-3.3.4p7-2
/usr/man/man1/x3270.1 -> /usr/share/
V3.3 of x3270 fails to launch. Reverting to v3.2 fixes the problem.
Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Peter A. Castro on 2/9/2006 2:39 PM:
>>> This is an update for the suite3270 packages based on version 3.3.4p6
>>> plus patch 07 for c3270, s3270, tcl3270 and x3270 yielding 3.3.4p7
>>>
>>
>&
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Luke Kendall wrote:
On 8 Feb, Peter A. Castro wrote:
This is an update for the suite3270 packages based on version 3.3.4p6
plus patch 07 for c3270, s3270, tcl3270 and x3270 yielding 3.3.4p7
suite3270-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
c3270-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
pr3287-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
On 8 Feb, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> This is an update for the suite3270 packages based on version 3.3.4p6
> plus patch 07 for c3270, s3270, tcl3270 and x3270 yielding 3.3.4p7
>
> suite3270-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
> c3270-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
> pr3287-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
This is an update for the suite3270 packages based on version 3.3.4p6
plus patch 07 for c3270, s3270, tcl3270 and x3270 yielding 3.3.4p7
suite3270-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
c3270-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
pr3287-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
s3270-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
tcl3270-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
x3270-3.3.4p7-1.tar.bz2
This
me in very handy.
The suite is composed of the following packages:
c3270 - Curses based emulator
pr3287 - 3287 printer emulator
s3270 - Scripted emulator
tcl3270 - Tcl/Tk based emulator
x3270 - X-Windows based emulator
Each of the above is a separate package and will appear as separate
pac
30 matches
Mail list logo
