On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:13:24PM +0900, jojelino wrote:
>On 2013-02-26 PM 10:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>This is Cygwin only.
>>
>cygwin malloc is not reentrant according to malloc_wrapper.cc so let's
>not expect performance like linux or native windows. until someone
>have plenty of time to r
ptmalloc3 would be even better.
http://www.malloc.de/en/
--
Reini Urban
http://cpanel.net/ http://www.perl-compiler.org/
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:
On 2013-02-26 PM 10:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
This is Cygwin only.
Corinna
cygwin malloc is not reentrant according to malloc_wrapper.cc so let's
not expect performance like linux or native windows. until someone have
plenty of time to resolve this issue.
--
Regards.
--
Problem reports
On Feb 26 06:22, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
> On 2/26/2013 4:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Feb 26 15:35, MITSUNARI Shigeo wrote:
> >>Hi.
> >>
> >>I found that the performance of malloc/free is wrong under multi-threading.
> >>The following test program reproduces the problem.
> >>
> >>The progr
On 2/26/2013 4:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 26 15:35, MITSUNARI Shigeo wrote:
Hi.
I found that the performance of malloc/free is wrong under multi-threading.
The following test program reproduces the problem.
The program repeats malloc and free under multi-thread.
I measured the timin
On Feb 26 15:35, MITSUNARI Shigeo wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I found that the performance of malloc/free is wrong under multi-threading.
> The following test program reproduces the problem.
>
> The program repeats malloc and free under multi-thread.
> I measured the timing on Cygwin and Linux.
>
> timing(
Hi.
I found that the performance of malloc/free is wrong under multi-threading.
The following test program reproduces the problem.
The program repeats malloc and free under multi-thread.
I measured the timing on Cygwin and Linux.
timing(sec)| threadNum
---+--+-
7 matches
Mail list logo