On 2021-08-29 06:06, Dan Harkless wrote:
On 8/29/2021 4:02 AM, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
Am 28.08.2021 um 18:23 schrieb Dan Harkless:
Looks like it's because in findutils 4.8.0-1, the bigram.exe program
is no longer provided, but the /usr/bin/updatedb script (still)
depends on it being there
On 8/29/2021 4:02 AM, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
Am 28.08.2021 um 18:23 schrieb Dan Harkless:
Looks like it's because in findutils 4.8.0-1, the bigram.exe program
is no longer provided, but the /usr/bin/updatedb script (still)
depends on it being there:
[...]
+ for binary in $find
Am 28.08.2021 um 18:23 schrieb Dan Harkless:
Looks like it's because in findutils 4.8.0-1, the bigram.exe program is
no longer provided, but the /usr/bin/updatedb script (still) depends on
it being there:
[...]
+ for binary in $find $frcode $bigram $code
+ checkbinary /usr/l
On 8/28/2021 9:15 AM, Dan Harkless wrote:
[...]
Sorry for the Webmail-mangled spacing in that last message. Trying again
here:
Howdy. Quick bug to report that I was surprised not to be able to find prior
discussion of. My nightly updatedb job stopped working after 2021-08-03, but
I'd been
Howdy. Quick bug to report that I was surprised not to be able to find prior
discussion of. My nightly updatedb job stopped working after 2021-08-03, but
I'd been too busy to do much troubleshooting until today.
Looks like it's because in findutils 4.8.0-1, the bigram.exe program is no
longer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Steve Kelem on 3/21/2006 5:29 PM:
>
> I'm having trouble running updatedb. I've tried findutils-4.2.27-1 and
> findutils-4.3.0-1.
> When I run updatedb manually, I get the message:
> updatedb needs to be able to execute /usr/lib/lapack/f
The lapack maintainer would be me.
>That's because /etc/profile.d/lapack.sh is polluting the namespace with
>BINDIR=/usr/lib/lapack
Hm, you are correct. This is not purposeful, but inadvertent. I did not note
carefully that the script is being sourced, so that modifications to commonly
used env
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> In the meantime, as a workaround, you can do 'unset $BINDIR' prior
> to running updatedb.
Make that 'unset BINDIR'. My proofreading isn't very good today :)
--
Eric Blake
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
Steve Kelem elementcxi.com> writes:
>
> I'm having trouble running updatedb. I've tried findutils-4.2.27-1 and
> findutils-4.3.0-1.
> When I run updatedb manually, I get the message:
> updatedb needs to be able to execute /usr/lib/lapack/find, but cannot.
> The directory /usr/lib/lapack contai
I'm having trouble running updatedb. I've tried findutils-4.2.27-1 and
findutils-4.3.0-1.
When I run updatedb manually, I get the message:
updatedb needs to be able to execute /usr/lib/lapack/find, but cannot.
The directory /usr/lib/lapack contains
cygblas.dll cyglapack.dll
Thanks for your he
* Alexander Enchevich (03-04-02 20:41 +0100)
> the updatedb script terminates with this error:
> /usr/bin/find: . changed during execution
>
> this is happening somewhere here (around line 115):
> [...]
> I thought its because there is no /usr/bin/find (it's in /bin), so I tried
> to modify the u
the updatedb script terminates with this error:
/usr/bin/find: . changed during execution
this is happening somewhere here (around line 115):
# FIXME figure out how to sort null-terminated strings, and use -print0.
{
if test -n "$SEARCHPATHS"; then
if [ "$LOCALUSER" != "" ]; then
su $LOCA
Hi!!
Since a couple of days ago (since I upgraded to the latest Cygwin? Not
sure, but more or less the timeframe is right),
"updatedb" won't run till completion:
DEVELO~1> updatedb
/usr/bin/find: . changed during execution of /usr/bin/find
DEVELO~1>
??¿¿
Any ideas / tips?
Thanks a lot!
13 matches
Mail list logo
