Problem with perldoc output (was: Re: two problems w/ new perl encountered)

2003-03-17 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Thomas, Now again CC'd to the Cygwin list. Am Montag, 17. März 2003 um 09:01 schriebst du: > "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 16.03.03 16:42:01: >> >> Hallo mellman, >> >> Am Freitag, 14. März 2003 um 22:46 schriebst du: >> >> > Is there a way to dump the exact pipeline

Re: two problems w/ new perl encountered

2003-03-16 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo mellman, Am Freitag, 14. März 2003 um 22:46 schriebst du: > Is there a way to dump the exact pipeline that perldoc uses? > It says something in the man page about nroff, etc ... > Does it use nroff or groff? /usr/bin/nroff From perldoc -h: Options: -t Display pod using pod2text ins

Re: two problems w/ new perl encountered

2003-03-14 Thread Greg Matheson
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > This wouldn't be so bad, because perldoc does work, sort of. For a while now, > > however, it's terminfo entry has been screwed up - rather than intelligent curses > > effects, I get the expanded escape sequences. Man works okay. > Not the f

Re: two problems w/ new perl encountered

2003-03-14 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Thomas, Am Freitag, 14. März 2003 um 17:06 schriebst du: > I just updated cygwin and now have two problems with the cygwin port of perl: > - in > perl -d some-script > I have to hit Enter two times for it to be recognized. Try to set PERLIO in the environment, e.g. $ export PERLIO=r

two problems w/ new perl encountered

2003-03-14 Thread Thomas Mellman
I just updated cygwin and now have two problems with the cygwin port of perl: - in perl -d some-script I have to hit Enter two times for it to be recognized. - man perlfunc now returns: No manual entry for perlfunc This wouldn't be so bad, because perldoc does work, sort of. For a wh