Yes, of course, I didn't realize the installer environment was the only
thing you evaluated.
bsd.rd install kernel is not meant for troubleshooting/testing or
administrative use. It _is_not_ a "live cd" or live environment meant
for doing anything other than installing the system.
Thanks for
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 11:43:42, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
If you tested it in a VM, then you would have seen that Perl is in the
base.
Using this file:
http://fastly.cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.2/amd64/install62.iso
If you extract one of the files will be:
6.2/amd64/base62.tgz
then if you
If you tested it in a VM, then you would have seen that Perl is in the
base. I administer dozens of OpenBSD machines for $work. Are you
seriously questioning my intelligence to that degree. or are you just
that obstinate?
I will admit, that it looks as if you were correct in regards to FreeBSD
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 09:07:10, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
I am writing this from an OpenBSD machine. I can indeed confirm that
Perl is in the base sytem.
thanks for the email. however i think we may have a pot-kettle situation here,
so allow me to illuminate you. just because you are on an OpenBSD
I am writing this from an OpenBSD machine. I can indeed confirm that
Perl is in the base sytem. Those pages you reference don't show every
program in the base system, they merely show the install file sets. You
obviously have little experience with *BSD, please don't trumpet
misinformation if y
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:33:58, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
OpenBSD does indeed come with perl, as its package managegment system,
"pkg_add" is written pretty much entirely in perl. Perl is a first class
citizens over at OpenBSD.
Using this, no it doesnt:
http://fastly.cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6
Hi Steven,
OpenBSD does indeed come with perl, as its package managegment system,
"pkg_add" is written pretty much entirely in perl. Perl is a first class
citizens over at OpenBSD. I do believe it is also in the base system of
FreeBSD as well.
Cheers,
Jordan Geoghegan
On 03/23/18 22:07, S
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:53:54, Achim Gratz wrote:
The whole point of splitting off perl_base from perl was to eventually
make it available as a "Base" package so that it could be relied upon by
other parts of the system. I don't remember why I didn't put it into
Base at the time, but maybe we sho
Steven Penny writes:
> which is a Perl script. I understand that "texlive-collection-basic" requires
> "perl_base", but if a user removed Perl first then uninstallation of texlive
> would fail. Perhaps "update_tlpdb" could be rewritten as a shell script.
The whole point of splitting off perl_base
On 3/22/2018 10:10 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
This package contains this file:
/etc/preremove/texlive-collection-basic.sh
which in turn calls:
/usr/libexec/update_tlpdb
which is a Perl script. I understand that "texlive-collection-basic"
requires
"perl_base", but if a user removed Perl
This package contains this file:
/etc/preremove/texlive-collection-basic.sh
which in turn calls:
/usr/libexec/update_tlpdb
which is a Perl script. I understand that "texlive-collection-basic" requires
"perl_base", but if a user removed Perl first then uninstallation of texlive
would fail
11 matches
Mail list logo
