Re: Why does /etc/setup/installed.db list tar.bz2 even if tar.xz

2018-02-05 Thread Jon Turney
On 04/02/2018 11:09, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 04/02/2018 03:19, Steven Penny wrote: On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 23:48:00, wrote: The installed.db seems to always list packages as being tar.bz2 even when they are tar.xz. Is there any reason for this? Or is it a bug? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013

Re: Why does /etc/setup/installed.db list tar.bz2 even if tar.xz

2018-02-04 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 04/02/2018 03:19, Steven Penny wrote: On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 23:48:00, wrote: The installed.db seems to always list packages as being tar.bz2 even when they are tar.xz. Is there any reason for this? Or is it a bug? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-10/msg00170.html This is an old thread

Re: Why does /etc/setup/installed.db list tar.bz2 even if tar.xz

2018-02-03 Thread Steven Penny
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 23:48:00, wrote: The installed.db seems to always list packages as being tar.bz2 even when they are tar.xz. Is there any reason for this? Or is it a bug? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-10/msg00170.html This is an old thread, but it appears this issue was never answered

[x86_64] ruby-rdoc-3.12.2-1.tar.bz2 package: cannot download

2013-10-14 Thread Frédéric Bron
This package seems to be a dependency for other packages I need. However, whatever the download site I choose, the download process always stops before the end. -> "Download Incomplete. Try again?" Is this package corrupted on all mirrors or is the problem on my side? Regards, Frédéric -- Problem

Why does /etc/setup/installed.db list tar.bz2 even if tar.xz

2013-10-12 Thread cygwin
The installed.db seems to always list packages as being tar.bz2 even when they are tar.xz. Is there any reason for this? Or is it a bug? Thanks, Jeff -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com

/usr/licence dir from lilypond-2.12.4-1.tar.bz2?

2010-08-17 Thread Oleksandr Gavenko
$ ls /usr/license/ lilypond-doc From http://cygwin.com/setup.html: In your binary package include a directory /usr/share/doc/foo/ that includes any binary-relevant vendor documentation, such as ChangeLog's, copyright licence's, README's etc. May be in next packaging it's better place licence

Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 13 16:04, Eric Blake wrote: > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > > > > IIU the SUSv4 description C, and given that a newly opened console is > > always setup with the default termios settings anyway, we could simply > > set O_TTY_INIT to 0 and be done with it: > > Yep, that's my un

Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Blake
Eric Blake byu.net> writes: > In other words, tcsetattr should always be used on a struct termios obtained > from a read-modify-write manner, and never from a memset(0) manner, where the > use of O_TTY_INIT guarantees (trivially, if it is defined to 0) that any > extension fields in struct ter

Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Blake
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > IIU the SUSv4 description C, and given that a newly opened console is > always setup with the default termios settings anyway, we could simply > set O_TTY_INIT to 0 and be done with it: Yep, that's my understanding as well. This link is also informative

Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-13 Thread Andy Koppe
2010/1/13 Corinna Vinschen: > That only occurs in CYGWIN=tty mode.  The problem was that in tty mode a > piece of code reset all termios settings of the console to 0.  That was > no problem so far, but now that the VERASE key from the termios settings > is used to delete chars in the console, it hu

Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 13 06:30, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Corinna Vinschen on 1/13/2010 4:07 AM: > > That only occurs in CYGWIN=tty mode. The problem was that in tty mode a > > piece of code reset all termios settings of the console to 0. That was > > no problem so far, but now that the VERASE key from t

Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Blake
According to Corinna Vinschen on 1/13/2010 4:07 AM: > That only occurs in CYGWIN=tty mode. The problem was that in tty mode a > piece of code reset all termios settings of the console to 0. That was > no problem so far, but now that the VERASE key from the termios settings > is used to delete cha

Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 12 12:46, Karl M wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:48:34 +0100 > > From: corinna > > Subject: Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2 > > > > On Jan 11 22:39, Karl M wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi All... > >> >

RE: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-12 Thread Karl M
> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:48:34 +0100 > From: corinna > Subject: Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2 > > On Jan 11 22:39, Karl M wrote: >> >> >> Hi All... >> >> I just tried out the latest snapshot and had two problems on a Vista >> Bus

Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 11 22:39, Karl M wrote: > > > Hi All... > > I just tried out the latest snapshot and had two problems on a Vista Business > SP2 machine. > > The first problem was that in bash shell launched from the cygwin.bat file in > a console > window, the backspace did nothing. > > I also rec

Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2

2010-01-11 Thread Karl M
Hi All... I just tried out the latest snapshot and had two problems on a Vista Business SP2 machine. The first problem was that in bash shell launched from the cygwin.bat file in a console window, the backspace did nothing. I also received the following error from find: $ find / -name '

Re: lftp-3.5.11-2*tar.bz2 wrongly located under release/?

2007-07-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 12 14:20, fergus wrote: > >>Currently on at least one mirror the two files > >>lftp-3.5.11-2*tar.bz2 are wrongly (?) located > >>directly under release/ and not release/lftp/. > >>Fergus > > >Thanks for the hint. Fixed. > >Corin

Re: lftp-3.5.11-2*tar.bz2 wrongly located under release/?

2007-07-12 Thread fergus
Currently on at least one mirror the two files lftp-3.5.11-2*tar.bz2 are wrongly (?) located directly under release/ and not release/lftp/. Fergus Thanks for the hint. Fixed. Corinna Still in setup.ini after a recent update to 1184241607: an entry for lftp under a paragraph headed @release

Re: lftp-3.5.11-2*tar.bz2 wrongly located under release/?

2007-07-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 11 07:36, fergus wrote: > Currently on at least one mirror the two files lftp-3.5.11-2*tar.bz2 are > wrongly (?) located directly under release/ and not release/lftp/. > Fergus Thanks for the hint. Fixed. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails

lftp-3.5.11-2*tar.bz2 wrongly located under release/?

2007-07-10 Thread fergus
Currently on at least one mirror the two files lftp-3.5.11-2*tar.bz2 are wrongly (?) located directly under release/ and not release/lftp/. Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation

Re: patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2 package broken on all mirrors I've tried

2007-04-18 Thread day tues
r/cygwin \ http://cygwin.basemirror.de; do \ wget -q -O - $URL/release/patch/patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2|md5sum -;done 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- <

Re: patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2 package broken on all mirrors I've tried

2007-04-18 Thread Brian Dessent
- $URL/release/patch/patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2|md5sum -;done 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af254420 *- Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#un

Re: patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2 package broken on all mirrors I've tried

2007-04-18 Thread day tues
Brian, Thank you. Apparently, the mirror that you supplied works OK. However, try these (and I have tried dozen of them, trust me): ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/cygwin/release/patch/patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/release/patch/patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2

Re: patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2 package broken on all mirrors I've tried

2007-04-18 Thread Brian Dessent
day tues wrote: > It seems that the package > > patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2 19-Feb-2007 11:54 51K > > is broken. I have tried to (not related to any Cygwin > installation) > download it and unpack it. It says it's broken and MD5 > sums do > not match to the sums give

patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2 package broken on all mirrors I've tried

2007-04-18 Thread day tues
It seems that the package patch-2.5.8-9.tar.bz2 19-Feb-2007 11:54 51K is broken. I have tried to (not related to any Cygwin installation) download it and unpack it. It says it's broken and MD5 sums do not match to the sums given in the file. Expected MD5 sum: 3d583f7ac459563ee6f45e75af2

Re: New procps package filename is procps-3.2.7-1-bin.tar.bz2 instead of procps-3.2.7-1.tar.bz2

2007-01-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 10 07:39, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > see subject Thanks, fixed on sourceware. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe

New procps package filename is procps-3.2.7-1-bin.tar.bz2 instead of procps-3.2.7-1.tar.bz2

2007-01-09 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
see subject Ciao Volker -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

2006-06-15 Thread Reini Urban
Rajendra S. Gad schrieb: Sir Igor, I am installing the DSpace application on the UBUNTU version 5.10 . Please inform me where I will have better instruction for installing and configuring DSpace on this plateform. Slightly off-topic, but for the sake of interest: I'm just crosscompiling libstdc

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

2006-03-21 Thread Igor Peshansky
>> >> Sir, > >> >> I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal > >> >> > >> >> http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 > >> >> > >> >> Please guide

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

2006-03-21 Thread Rajendra S. Gad
17 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: >> > >> >> Sir, >> >> I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal >> >> >> >> http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 >> >> >> &g

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

2006-03-21 Thread Owen Rees
--On Monday, March 20, 2006 12:17:31 -0500 Igor Peshansky wrote: On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: Please inform me where I will have better instruction for installing and configuring DSpace on this plateform. I have no idea what DSpace is, but if it does indeed require Cygwin tools

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

2006-03-20 Thread Igor Peshansky
.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 > >> > >> Please guide me. > > > > The question is: why do you need it? This package has been obsolete for > > some time, and has been superceded with functionality within Cygwin > > itself (see /usr/share/

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

2006-03-20 Thread Rajendra S. Gad
t; http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 >> >> Please guide me. > > The question is: why do you need it? This package has been obsolete for > some time, and has been superceded with functionality within Cygwin > itself (see

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

2006-03-17 Thread Charles Wilson
Igor Peshansky wrote: http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 Please guide me. The question is: why do you need it? This package has been obsolete for some time, and has been superceded with functionality within Cygwin itself (see /usr/share/doc

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

2006-03-16 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: > Sir, > I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal > > http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 > > Please guide me. The question is: why do you need it? This package has

cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

2006-03-16 Thread Rajendra S. Gad
Sir, I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal "http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2"; Please guide me. Regards -- Mr. R. S. Gad Senior Lecture Electronics Division Department of Physics Goa University Goa Ind

FW: groff-1.18.1-2.tar.bz2

2005-06-14 Thread Keith Weintraub
all for all of your help, KW -Original Message- From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 5:18 PM To: Keith Weintraub; cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: groff-1.18.1-2.tar.bz2 At 05:02 PM 6/14/2005, you wrote: >Folks, >No matter what mirror I

Re: groff-1.18.1-2.tar.bz2

2005-06-14 Thread Larry Hall
At 05:02 PM 6/14/2005, you wrote: >Folks, >No matter what mirror I go to I get an error (incomplete >download) of groff. Specifically >groff-1.18.1-2.tar.bz2. > >Any ideas why? Nope. No problems here using http://mirrors.rcn.net. -- Larry Hall

groff-1.18.1-2.tar.bz2

2005-06-14 Thread Keith Weintraub
Folks, No matter what mirror I go to I get an error (incomplete download) of groff. Specifically groff-1.18.1-2.tar.bz2. Any ideas why? KW -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation

Re: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 contains extra files?

2004-08-12 Thread peter waltman
> > So this is not a Cygwin specific problem and therefore, off-topic for this > list. > -- apologies. this got posted in reply to the wrong article. I'll add it to the correct topic. Peter -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cy

Re: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 contains extra files?

2004-08-12 Thread Larry Hall
At 02:32 AM 8/12/2004, you wrote: >Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes: > >> >> On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 02:00:00PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >> >I downloaded and installed >> >http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 >>

Re: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 contains extra files?

2004-08-11 Thread peter waltman
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes: > > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 02:00:00PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >I downloaded and installed > >http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 > > > >and was a bit surprised to see that it include

Re: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 contains extra files?

2004-08-08 Thread Christopher Faylor
alled >> >http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 >> > >> >and was a bit surprised to see that it included files normally in the >> >w32api and mingw-runtime packages as well as a few other files (and >> >/bin/dumper.exe which is normally in t

Re: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 contains extra files?

2004-08-08 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:59:32PM -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 02:00:00PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >I downloaded and installed > >http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 > > > >and w

Re: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 contains extra files?

2004-08-08 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 02:00:00PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >I downloaded and installed >http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 > >and was a bit surprised to see that it included files normally in the >w32api and mingw-runtime packages as well as a

http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 contains extra files?

2004-08-08 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
I downloaded and installed http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin-inst-20040802.tar.bz2 and was a bit surprised to see that it included files normally in the w32api and mingw-runtime packages as well as a few other files (and /bin/dumper.exe which is normally in the cygwin package was missing). When

rxvt 2.7.10-4.tar.bz2: rclock missing

2004-03-17 Thread Demmer, Thomas
Hi all, rclock is missing in the "...-4" executable version. Is this by mistake or on purpose? The sources are still in "...-4-src", so I guess it is just an omission. Ciao Tom Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüssen, Thomas Demmer Kraft Foods R&D Inc. WW Chocolate Process Development Tel.: +4

Re: bugreport: packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2

2004-01-14 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Gerrit schrieb: oh my god, sorry, I was fooled by the sort order in my mailbox, forget it;) > Teun wrote: >> As recorded in the thread "gcc -mno-cygwin fails", there is I think >> a packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030804-1.tar, component >> of the gcc-mingw-3

Re: bugreport: packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2

2004-01-14 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Teun wrote: > As recorded in the thread "gcc -mno-cygwin fails", there is I think > a packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030804-1.tar, component > of the gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2 package. Please upgrade to gcc-3.3.1-3. Gerrit -- =^..^=

Re: Is gcc-core-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2 corrupted?

2003-10-31 Thread Cliff Hones
Jörg Schaible wrote: > what does "file" report? > > $> file gcc-core-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2 This shows that it is actually a gzipped file. Setup knows what to do with both bzip2 and gzip formats, without relying on the extension being right. It is actually a gzipped empty tar f

RE: Is gcc-core-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2 corrupted?

2003-10-31 Thread Jörg Schaible
John Daniel Doucette wrote on Friday, October 31, 2003 2:05 PM: > Hi, > > If I test gcc-core-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2 I get the error: > > gcc-core-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2: bad magic number (file not created > by bzip2) You can use the `bzip2recover' program to attempt > to recover da

Is gcc-core-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2 corrupted?

2003-10-31 Thread John Daniel Doucette
Hi, If I test gcc-core-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2 I get the error: gcc-core-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2: bad magic number (file not created by bzip2) You can use the `bzip2recover' program to attempt to recover data from undamaged sections of corrupted files. I downloaded it twice from mirrors.rcn.net and once

Re: problem with tcsh-6.12.00-7.tar.bz2

2003-10-09 Thread Andrew Grimm
>> This package includes /etc/csh.login which has the line: >> >> set TERM=cygwin >> >> This should instead read: >> >> set term=cygwin >> >> which will set the shell variable term and the environment variable >> TERM correctly when tcsh is used as the base shell for the Cygwin shell >> w

Re: problem with tcsh-6.12.00-7.tar.bz2

2003-10-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 06:04:41PM -0600, Andrew Grimm wrote: > This package includes /etc/csh.login which has the line: > > set TERM=cygwin > > This should instead read: > > set term=cygwin > > which will set the shell variable term and the environment variable TERM > correctly whe

problem with tcsh-6.12.00-7.tar.bz2

2003-10-08 Thread Andrew Grimm
This package includes /etc/csh.login which has the line: set TERM=cygwin This should instead read: set term=cygwin which will set the shell variable term and the environment variable TERM correctly when tcsh is used as the base shell for the Cygwin shell window. -Andy -- Unsu

RE: bugreport: packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2

2003-09-25 Thread Shankar Unni
Larry Hall wrote: > At 01:31 PM 9/25/2003, Shankar Unni you wrote: > >Teun Burgers wrote: > >> gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2 package. > > ^^ > > > >What the heck is this package? > I'm not sure what you&#

Re: bugreport: packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2

2003-09-25 Thread Larry Hall
onent >>> of the gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2 package. >> ^^ >> >>What the heck is this package? I see a "gcc-3.3.1-2" and a >>"gcc-mingw-20030911-2" package in the standard distribution, but not a >

Re: bugreport: packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2

2003-09-25 Thread Larry Hall
At 01:31 PM 9/25/2003, Shankar Unni you wrote: >Teun Burgers wrote: > >> As recorded in the thread "gcc -mno-cygwin fails", there is I think >> a packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030804-1.tar, component >> of the gcc-ming

Re: bugreport: packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2

2003-09-25 Thread Shankar Unni
Teun Burgers wrote: > As recorded in the thread "gcc -mno-cygwin fails", there is I think > a packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030804-1.tar, component > of the gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2 package. ^^ What the heck is this pac

bugreport: packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2

2003-09-25 Thread Teun Burgers
As recorded in the thread "gcc -mno-cygwin fails", there is I think a packaging error in gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030804-1.tar, component of the gcc-mingw-3.3.1-20030911-2.tar.bz2 package. viewing the contents of the .tar file and looking for the symlinks I get: tar tvf gcc-mingw-3.3.1-2003

Re: crypt-1.0-2.tar.bz2: Old files ?

2003-08-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:18:52PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > According to http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00151.html > > crypt and irc were updated and repackaged to .bz2, but > apparently only irc was recompiled. crypt.exe and libcrypt.a > (and all other files) ha

crypt-1.0-2.tar.bz2: Old files ?

2003-08-15 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
According to http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00151.html crypt and irc were updated and repackaged to .bz2, but apparently only irc was recompiled. crypt.exe and libcrypt.a (and all other files) have May 23 2000 timestamps. My apologies if I'm mistaken. -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: tar.bz2

2003-01-10 Thread David Robinow
Michael A Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:49:16 -0500 David Robinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> DEEPA SIVASANKARANE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >  could someone please tell me how to extract from a tar.bz2 >> >form

Re: tar.bz2

2003-01-10 Thread Michael A Chase
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:49:16 -0500 David Robinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DEEPA SIVASANKARANE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >  could someone please tell me how to extract from a tar.bz2 > >format ? > bzip2 --help > tar --help > info bzip2 > info tar

RE: tar.bz2

2003-01-10 Thread David Robinow
DEEPA SIVASANKARANE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >  could someone please tell me how to extract from a tar.bz2 >format ? bzip2 --help tar --help info bzip2 info tar __ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available.

RE: tar.bz2

2003-01-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're too impatient. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-01/msg00498.html Larry Original Message: - From: DEEPA SIVASANKARANE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:13:42 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tar.bz2 Hi, could someone please tell me how to ex

tar.bz2

2003-01-10 Thread DEEPA SIVASANKARANE
Hi, could someone please tell me how to extract from a tar.bz2 format ? thanx, regards, deepa -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http

Re: Perl 5.8 + cygwin-inst-20021023.tar.bz2 = Smooth Sailing

2002-10-24 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Gary, >>> In fact, things are so copacetic that I believe this snapshot may >>> be the next B20. >> :-) >> Great. I already updated the cygwin DLL at my production server and >> it seems to work well (Apache, Perl & SSHD running there together). > Sweet. So will we be seeing 5.8 moved t

RE: Perl 5.8 + cygwin-inst-20021023.tar.bz2 = Smooth Sailing

2002-10-23 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> Hallo Gary, > > Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2002 um 19:47 schriebst du: > > > No problems whatsoever so far with the new perl on the latest snapshot. > > This includes significant aclocal/automake/autoconfing and some of my own > > perling. In fact, things are so copacetic that I believe this sna

Re: Perl 5.8 + cygwin-inst-20021023.tar.bz2 = Smooth Sailing

2002-10-23 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Gary, Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2002 um 19:47 schriebst du: > No problems whatsoever so far with the new perl on the latest snapshot. > This includes significant aclocal/automake/autoconfing and some of my own > perling. In fact, things are so copacetic that I believe this snapshot may > be

Perl 5.8 + cygwin-inst-20021023.tar.bz2 = Smooth Sailing

2002-10-23 Thread Gary R Van Sickle
No problems whatsoever so far with the new perl on the latest snapshot. This includes significant aclocal/automake/autoconfing and some of my own perling. In fact, things are so copacetic that I believe this snapshot may be the next B20. -- Gary R. Van Sickle Braemar Inc. 11481 Rupp Dr. Burnsvill

Re: Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2

2002-05-15 Thread Charles Wilson
Rick Rankin wrote: > > When I compiled the source *with* ncurses, less worked perfectly with > TERM=nxterm. Is there a reason that the Cygwin binary was compiled without > ncurses (e.g., minimize package dependencies)? That's probably the reason. If it doesn't use ncurses, then it probably

Re: Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2

2002-05-15 Thread Rick Rankin
--- Rick Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In short, I'm not at all sure how it worked before. I need to look at the > source for less to understand how it determines that a terminal is "not fully > functional" and proceed from there. > Well, it seems that the problem is specific to the wa

Re: Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2

2002-05-15 Thread Rick Rankin
ch. That's when I discovered the circular links in the terminfo package. Using TERM=nxterm didn't work at all because there was no actual definition due to the circular links. I downloaded the ncurses source (ncurses-5.2-8.tar.bz2) and applied the included patches to reconstruct what I as

Re: Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2

2002-05-15 Thread Charles Wilson
Rick Rankin wrote: >>Also, terminfo-5.2-2 changed in only one respect from terminfo-5.2-1: it >>now uses the XFree86-4.2.0 terminal definitions for xterm-*. NOT the >>ncurses-provided definitions. >> > > Hmmm... Perhaps this explains the trouble I've been having with the xterm-color > defini

Re: Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2

2002-05-15 Thread Rick Rankin
Charles Wilson wrote: > Also, terminfo-5.2-2 changed in only one respect from terminfo-5.2-1: it > now uses the XFree86-4.2.0 terminal definitions for xterm-*. NOT the > ncurses-provided definitions. Hmmm... Perhaps this explains the trouble I've been having with the xterm-color definition of

Re: Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2

2002-05-14 Thread Charles Wilson
Charles Wilson wrote: > > However, I still had to hand edit some stuff; it looks like I missed a > cross-reference. Will fix shortly. terminfo-5.2-3 should be hitting the mirrors soon. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http:

Re: Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2

2002-05-14 Thread Charles Wilson
Rick Rankin wrote: > In the course of doing a complete reinstall from scratch, I discovered a set of > circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2. As distributed, > /usr/share/terminfo/n/nxterm is a symlink to ../x/xterm-color which is a > symlink to ../n/nxterm. This can be verifie

Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2

2002-05-14 Thread Rick Rankin
In the course of doing a complete reinstall from scratch, I discovered a set of circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2. As distributed, /usr/share/terminfo/n/nxterm is a symlink to ../x/xterm-color which is a symlink to ../n/nxterm. This can be verified by running tar -tvjf terminfo-5.2-2

RE: fortune-1.8-2.tar.bz2 minor bug

2002-04-19 Thread Heribert Dahms
TECTED]] Sent: Freitag, 19. April 2002 02:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fortune-1.8-2.tar.bz2 minor bug Hi Cygwin: The copy of fortune-1.8-2.tar.bz2 I get from planetmirror.com gives a warning message when I test it with bunzip -t. I get: bsip2: fortune-1.8-2.tar.bz2: trailing garbage afte

fortune-1.8-2.tar.bz2 minor bug

2002-04-18 Thread john . szetela
Hi Cygwin: The copy of fortune-1.8-2.tar.bz2 I get from planetmirror.com gives a warning message when I test it with bunzip -t. I get: bsip2: fortune-1.8-2.tar.bz2: trailing garbage after EOF ignored Not really a problem, but probably re-tarring it would be good. It installs fine... John

Re: Problems compiling latest snapshot - cygwin-src-20020219.tar.bz2

2002-02-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:45:37PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The latest snapshot as in the subject fails to compile. The error >occures when the make commands tries to execute in winsup/w32api, >which is empty. I re-added w32api and mingw to the snapshot sources. cgf -- Please do not send

Re: Problems compiling latest snapshot - cygwin-src-20020219.tar.bz2

2002-02-19 Thread Chris January
> The latest snapshot as in the subject fails to compile. The error > occures when the make commands tries to execute in winsup/w32api, > which is empty. The snapshot itself does contain a win32 directory > but its empty. I check the source of the stock 1.3.9-1 and it doesn't > have any files in t

Problems compiling latest snapshot - cygwin-src-20020219.tar.bz2

2002-02-19 Thread ptsekov
Hey there! ;) The latest snapshot as in the subject fails to compile. The error occures when the make commands tries to execute in winsup/w32api, which is empty. The snapshot itself does contain a win32 directory but its empty. I check the source of the stock 1.3.9-1 and it doesn't have any files

Re: gcc-2.95.3-5.tar.bz2 is BROKEN

2002-02-08 Thread Charles Wilson
Laurence F. Wood wrote: > > By any chance did the person that broke gcc also work on (and break) > bison-1.31-1? add(LaurenceWood) killfile. Welcome to the world of McNulty. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com

Re: gcc-2.95.3-5.tar.bz2 is BROKEN

2002-02-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:41:48PM -0500, Laurence F. Wood wrote: >The Cygwin version of gcc that currently downloads with setup >(gcc-2.95.3-5.tar.bz2) is BROKEN! Although I don't have time to >specifically isoloate the problem, the compiler breaks (reporting a >meanin

gcc-2.95.3-5.tar.bz2 is BROKEN

2002-02-07 Thread Laurence F. Wood
The Cygwin version of gcc that currently downloads with setup (gcc-2.95.3-5.tar.bz2) is BROKEN! Although I don't have time to specifically isoloate the problem, the compiler breaks (reporting a meaningless error) when compiling complex code using templates an example of which fo

Re: can't 'cd /"Program Files"' with cygwin-1.3.9-1.tar.bz2 DLL

2002-01-30 Thread Joe Wilson
Mea culpa. My bug report is bogus. I did not realize I was using a bash alias for "cd" which did not have appropriate double quoting for its arguments. Sorry about that. > > I am not able to cd /"Program Files" with the > > cygwin1.dll from cygwin-1.3.9-1.ta

Re: can't 'cd /"Program Files"' with cygwin-1.3.9-1.tar.bz2 DLL

2002-01-30 Thread Michael A Chase
- Original Message - From: "Joe Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 09:50 Subject: can't 'cd /"Program Files"' with cygwin-1.3.9-1.tar.bz2 DLL > I am not able to cd /"Program Files&q

can't 'cd /"Program Files"' with cygwin-1.3.9-1.tar.bz2 DLL

2002-01-30 Thread Joe Wilson
I am not able to cd /"Program Files" with the cygwin1.dll from cygwin-1.3.9-1.tar.bz2. I can successfully do this same operation using the older cygwin-1.3.6-6.tar.bz2, however. Is this a regression? As an aside, 'cd /"Program*Files"' works fine with both dll