On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 16:12:17 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:31:16PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Guy Harrison wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:49:28 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Harrison)
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>
>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:31:16PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>
>
> Guy Harrison wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:49:28 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Harrison)
> >wrote:
> >
> >
>
>
> [snip]
>
>
> >Could someone enlighten me about 'allow_ntsec'. How does CygWin turn
> >this on?
>
>
>
> W
Guy Harrison wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:49:28 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Harrison)
> wrote:
>
>
[snip]
> Could someone enlighten me about 'allow_ntsec'. How does CygWin turn
> this on?
When you add "ntsec" to the environment variable CYGWIN. Check FAQ and
documentation for more
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:49:28 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Harrison)
wrote:
I'm pleased to be able to report some progress! I've located where the
key difference lies between sshd running as an NT service and sshd
running in just about any other fashion.
1236int
1237get_fi
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:59:44 -0500, Peter Buckley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>IIRC, SYSTEM should be the owner of the keys. And it is highly
>recommended that the service be run as SYSTEM. Check out
>http://tech.erdelynet.com for more info on the permissions for the key
>files etc.
Info is mu
IIRC, SYSTEM should be the owner of the keys. And it is highly
recommended that the service be run as SYSTEM. Check out
http://tech.erdelynet.com for more info on the permissions for the key
files etc.
HTH,
Peter
Guy Harrison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not knowing anything about SSH I didn't realise
Hi,
Not knowing anything about SSH I didn't realise openssh-3.0.2p1-4 (and
former) versions shouldn't have been asking for a password with the
correct keys at either end. I assumed I'd got something in a mess. It
appears not.
In the end I compiled openssh so I could get a bit more information o
7 matches
Mail list logo