Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

2013-02-11 Thread David Stacey
On 11/02/13 20:14, Warren Young wrote: On 2/6/2013 15:44, David Stacey wrote: I've run four sets of tests, with sqlite3 3.7.13 and 3.7.15, both with and without Warren's patch. The bottom line is that Subversion appears to function identically in all four cases, and there was no significant diff

Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

2013-02-11 Thread Warren Young
On 2/6/2013 15:44, David Stacey wrote: I've run four sets of tests, with sqlite3 3.7.13 and 3.7.15, both with and without Warren's patch. The bottom line is that Subversion appears to function identically in all four cases, and there was no significant difference in runtime performance (i.e. the

Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

2013-02-06 Thread David Stacey
On 20/01/13 13:00, David Stacey wrote: On 20/01/13 10:45, Achim Gratz wrote: David Stacey writes: >I've done some more testing, but with little success. I ran the >Subversion built-in tests on sqlite3-3.7.15-1 without Warren's patch, >and again on sqlite3-3.7.13-1 with the new patch applied. In

Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

2013-01-20 Thread David Stacey
On 20/01/13 10:45, Achim Gratz wrote: David Stacey writes: >I've done some more testing, but with little success. I ran the >Subversion built-in tests on sqlite3-3.7.15-1 without Warren's patch, >and again on sqlite3-3.7.13-1 with the new patch applied. In both >cases, the Subversion tests plodd

Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

2013-01-20 Thread Achim Gratz
David Stacey writes: > I've done some more testing, but with little success. I ran the > Subversion built-in tests on sqlite3-3.7.15-1 without Warren's patch, > and again on sqlite3-3.7.13-1 with the new patch applied. In both > cases, the Subversion tests plodded along nicely and then froze after

Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

2013-01-20 Thread David Stacey
On 08/01/13 21:31, Warren Young wrote: I've made some SQLite 3.7.15.1-1 packages, and put them up for testing: I've done some more testing, but with little success. I ran the Subversion built-in tests on sqlite3-3.7.15-1 without Warren's patch, and again on sqlite3-3.7.13-1 with the new patch

Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

2013-01-09 Thread Warren Young
On 1/9/2013 15:27, David Stacey wrote: On 08/01/2013 21:31, Warren Young wrote: I guess I shouldn't have moved this discussion to Cygwin-Apps, since it's been greeted by crickets for the past 10 days. I rebuilt Subversion from clean (again with the test sqlite3 package) and ran the tests a sec

Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

2013-01-08 Thread Achim Gratz
Warren Young writes: > I guess I shouldn't have moved this discussion to Cygwin-Apps, since > it's been greeted by crickets for the past 10 days. So to repost: I've downloaded the test packages and been reviewing the patches, but just being back at work from the holidays I couldn't spend much tim

Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

2013-01-08 Thread Warren Young
On 11/21/2012 12:01, Achim Gratz wrote: FWIW, I think Yaakov is more immediately concerned about the additional API: -DSQLITE_ENABLE_COLUMN_METADATA\ -DSQLITE_ENABLE_FTS3 -DSQLITE_ENABLE_FTS_PARENTHESIS\ -DSQLITE_ENABLE_FTS4 I guess I shouldn't have moved this discussion to Cygwin-Apps,