> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:27:10PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen
> (garbage mail) wrote:
> >> Also, the problems.html page is surely the wrong place for a tutorial
> >> for how to debug the cygwin DLL. A hyperlink
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:27:10PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
>> Also, the problems.html page is surely the wrong place for a tutorial
>> for how to debug the cygwin DLL. A hyperlink to a page which talked
>> about this, with a caveat about this being only for the technicall
Hannu:
> >>>Most likely... Some wording regarding "download the debug info" needs
> >>>to be added to "problems.html" - I guess.
> >>
CGF:
> >>That sort of presupposes that someone is interested in walking people
> >>through the debugging of the cygwin DLL. I know I'm not interested and
> >>I h
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:40:33AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:23:56PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Christopher Faylor
>>>
>>>
>>
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:23:56PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> >> Of Christopher Faylor
> >
> >
> >> >Idea, to help debug things like the above:
> >> >
> >> > Alt
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:23:56PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
>> Of Christopher Faylor
>
>
>> >Idea, to help debug things like the above:
>> >
>> > Alt 1) Make an _unstripped_ cygwin1.dll available in a package named
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> >Idea, to help debug things like the above:
> >
> > Alt 1) Make an _unstripped_ cygwin1.dll available in a package named
> >"cygwin-DEBUG-dll" or some such. Also make it be
> "TEST/Exp" forever.
> > Alt 2
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:41:46AM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
>> Of Christopher Faylor
>
>
>> ... You can't get a reliable crash dump
>> from a stripped DLL, which cygwin1.dll is, of course. I can't believe
>> that
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> ... You can't get a reliable crash dump
> from a stripped DLL, which cygwin1.dll is, of course. I can't believe
> that this has to be a FAQ entry but apparently it does.
>
> If you want to help with a back trace
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:31:31PM -0700, John Joganic wrote:
> Previous posts described a bug in mmap called via malloc. I am seeing a
> bug in mmap itself. The following test does not map large amounts of
> memory, nor does it leak. It crashes however, after 4193 (0x1061)
> iterations every
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:31:31PM -0700, John Joganic wrote:
>Previous posts described a bug in mmap called via malloc. I am seeing a
>bug in mmap itself. The following test does not map large amounts of
>memory, nor does it leak. It crashes however, after 4193 (0x1061)
>iterations every time
Previous posts described a bug in mmap called via malloc. I am seeing a
bug in mmap itself. The following test does not map large amounts of
memory, nor does it leak. It crashes however, after 4193 (0x1061)
iterations every time. Like the malloc crash, the call stack references
strdup, and i
12 matches
Mail list logo
