On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 07:45:34AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Well, shoot. So I tried again with WINEDEBUG=+relay to get a log of
> system calls,
> Wading through the noise, I saw two interesting things:
>
> 0030:Starting process L"C:\\cygwin64\\bin\\bash.exe" (entryproc=0x100401000)
> ...
> 00
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Richard Z wrote:
> strangely WINEDEBUG does nothing for me.
Did you remember to export it?
- Dan
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 07:45:34AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
thanks for the tipps and trying..
> There were lots of complaints from setup.exe (not wine) of the sort
> AddAccessAllowedAceEx(C:\cygwin64/etc/setup, group) failed: 1337
> but those can probably be ignored.
same here.
> Default install
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Richard Z wrote:
>> read in various places that it should work, but I get
>> "Cygwin is not supported on this Windows version" running
>> from both wineconsole or bash.
>
> got somewhat farther with "--allow-unsupported-windows"
> and also need "--site" because mir
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:26:19PM +0200, Richard Z wrote:
> Hi,
>
> read in various places that it should work, but I get
> "Cygwin is not supported on this Windows version" running
> from both wineconsole or bash.
got somewhat farther with "--allow-unsupported-windows"
and also need "--site" be
Hi,
read in various places that it should work, but I get
"Cygwin is not supported on this Windows version" running
from both wineconsole or bash.
wine-1.7.53-1.fc21
setup-x86.exe v 2.880
cat setup.log.full
2017/06/30 12:17:32 Starting cygwin install, version 2.880
2017/06/30 12:17:32 mbox Cyg
On 01/27/2005 at 10:32:51 AM, "Max Bowsher" wrote:
Why should setup be any different from other applications?
Can anyone quote any existing single-clickable UI components that
de-duplicate double clicks?
--- end of excerpt ---
The first ones that come to mind are pretty obvious:
Windows desktop
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Bertalan Fodor
> Sent: 27 January 2005 14:33
> I think double-click should work as one single click in this case,
> because the user gets no feedback that he've done something
> other than he wanted to.
But what did you *want* to
Fred Kulack wrote:
I think double-click should work as one single click in this case,
because the user gets no feedback that he've done something other than
he wanted to.
I think that's a perfectly reasonable argument to have.
If its important to the maintainers, we'll get indication of that now th
> I think double-click should work as one single click in this case,
> because the user gets no feedback that he've done something other than
> he wanted to.
I think that's a perfectly reasonable argument to have.
If its important to the maintainers, we'll get indication of that now that
it ha
I think double-click should work as one single click in this case,
because the user gets no feedback that he've done something other than
he wanted to.
This is a bug in the user's understanding of the interface, I think.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
P
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
Hello,
I've found that when a user double-clicks on a package, it is
interpreted as two single clicks, so it is not the current version that
gets selected, but the previous.
This is a bug in the user's understanding of the interface, I think.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: ht
Hello,
I've found that when a user double-clicks on a package, it is
interpreted as two single clicks, so it is not the current version that
gets selected, but the previous.
Bert
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.
I am setting up a new computer which has no network connection, so I use
another one to suck the install files onto a usb disk and then use that on
the new machine.
I have had similar dependency problems on install in the past; so, for good
measure, I select half a dozen mirrors. I do "download
Harold L Hunt wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Tue, 14 May 2002 16:12:51 EDT:
> The reason I chided you is that I happen to have inside knowledge that this
> is a change ('problem') with the openbox package, not with setup.exe.
Búgger!
My mistake.
Apologies.
--
Sam Edge
--
Unsubscribe inf
Sam,
The reason I chided you is that I happen to have inside knowledge that this
is a change ('problem') with the openbox package, not with setup.exe.
Version 0.99.1-3 of openbox installs to /usr/X11R6 (as many users requested)
rather than /usr as used in previous versions of openbox.
Thus,
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Sam Edge wrote:
>Harold L Hunt wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>on Tue, 14 May 2002 14:56:09 EDT:
>>You're complaining about openbox, which is a Cygwin/XFree86 package.
>>You know better than to send this inquiry to the Cygwin list
>
>As I explained, I suspec
Harold L Hunt wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Tue, 14 May 2002 14:56:09 EDT:
> You're complaining about openbox, which is a Cygwin/XFree86 package.
> You know better than to send this inquiry to the Cygwin list
As I explained, I suspect the problem is with setup.exe since the
package archive f
Sam,
You're complaining about openbox, which is a Cygwin/XFree86 package. You
know better than to send this inquiry to the Cygwin list; this discussion
belongs on the Cygwin/XFree86 list, where I have redirected it.
Harold
Sam Edge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've just updated fro openbox-0
I've just updated fro openbox-0.99.1-2.tar.bz2 to
openbox-0.99.1-3.tar.bz2 on two machines (NT4SP6a and Win95OSR2) and
on both it failed to populate /usr/share/openbox with a "menu" file or
/usr/share/openbox/styles with any style files except "twice."
When I use tar manually all the files are ex
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Setup.exe problem?
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Not sure if this is correct mailing list.
It is.
>
Hi folks,
Not sure if this is correct mailing list.
Tried using latest version of setup.exe on Win9x. Turned out it didn't work
when I used Direct Connection option
(cable is direct connection to internet). Using ie6 connection options worked
though.
Anyway, jus
The problem were nVidia's desktop management program 'nview', or the way
setup.exe opens the packages choice window. Anyhow, disabling nview made
the process going fine. nview is an optional part of the new driver for Geforce
graphics cards.
Regards
/Jonas
>The problem is solved, partly. I used
The problem is solved, partly. I used another user on my win2000 and
then it all worked fine. I have no idea what the difference is, except
that the user that worked does not belong to the admin group.
Cheers
/Jonas
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>Hello Jonas,
>
>
>Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 9:04:51 AM,
I have tried both "Install from Internet" and "Download from Internet".
On next page I have used the default Local package directory and tried
to specify my own. From the mirror-list I have choosen at least 5
different locations, same hanging result after downloading setup.ini.
Previous attempt
Jonas Eriksson wrote:
> When I try to install Cygwin with the latest setup.exe (2.194.2.21) it
> hangs after I have selected a mirror server to download from. It manages
> to download setup.ini but them immediately comes up with the message
> "This space intentionally left blank" and continues
Hello Jonas,
Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 9:04:51 AM, you wrote:
Please, provide some more information on the choices you've made on
the various pages of the setup program.
JE> When I try to install Cygwin with the latest setup.exe (2.194.2.21) it
JE> hangs after I have selected a mirror server
Hi!
When I try to install Cygwin with the latest setup.exe (2.194.2.21) it
hangs after I have selected a mirror server to download from. It manages
to download setup.ini but them immediately comes up with the message
"This space intentionally left blank" and continues to eat up all cpu
cycles
28 matches
Mail list logo
