On Mar 8 03:07, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Following up to myself...
>
> Mark Geisert wrote:
> > Hi Corinna,
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 2021, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Mar 5 01:11, Mark Geisert wrote:
> > > > Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > > On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > >
Following up to myself...
Mark Geisert wrote:
Hi Corinna,
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 5 01:11, Mark Geisert wrote:
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 04.03.2021 16:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Y
Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/5/2021 8:45 PM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 17:30:30 +0100
Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 05.03.2021 15:42, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Mar 5 01:11, Mark Geisert wrote:
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri
On 3/5/2021 8:45 PM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 17:30:30 +0100
Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 05.03.2021 15:42, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Mar 5 01:11, Mark Geisert wrote:
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 04.03.2021 16:17,
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 17:30:30 +0100
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 05.03.2021 15:42, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Mar 5 01:11, Mark Geisert wrote:
> >> Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
> >>> On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 04.03.2021 16:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> >
Hi Corinna,
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 5 01:11, Mark Geisert wrote:
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 04.03.2021 16:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:
On 05.03.2021 15:42, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Mar 5 01:11, Mark Geisert wrote:
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 04.03.2021 16:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:1
On Mar 5 01:11, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > On 04.03.2021 16:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
> > > > > marco atzeri wr
On Mar 5 01:18, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Mar 4 01:05, Mark Geisert wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > Is there a way around that? I'm not quite sure, so let's brain storm
> > > > a bit, ok?
> > > >
> > > > - One thing
Hi Corinna,
Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Mar 4 01:05, Mark Geisert wrote:
Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
Is there a way around that? I'm not quite sure, so let's brain storm
a bit, ok?
- One thing we could try is to remove the above code, but add a python
hack to dlsym inst
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 04.03.2021 16:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
marco atzeri wrote:
I have no problem to patch Python to solve the issue,
but I have n
On 04.03.2021 21:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 04.03.2021 16:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
marco atzeri wrote:
I have no problem to patch Python to solve the issue,
but I have not seen evidence of the dlsym me
On 04.03.2021 16:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
marco atzeri wrote:
I have no problem to patch Python to solve the issue,
but I have not seen evidence of the dlsym mechanism .
But of course I an NOT and exper
On Mar 4 01:05, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > Is there a way around that? I'm not quite sure, so let's brain storm
> > a bit, ok?
> >
> > - One thing we could try is to remove the above code, but add a python
> >hack to dlsym instead. This would let the "old"
On Mar 4 10:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
> > marco atzeri wrote:
> > > I have no problem to patch Python to solve the issue,
> > > but I have not seen evidence of the dlsym mechanism .
> > > But of cours
On Mar 4 18:05, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 12:00:25 +0100
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > [Ping Mark Geisert]
> >
> > Is there a way around that? I'm not quite sure, so let's brain storm
> > a bit, ok?
> >
> > - One thing we could try is to remove the abo
On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
marco atzeri wrote:
I have no problem to patch Python to solve the issue,
but I have not seen evidence of the dlsym mechanism .
But of course I an NOT and expert in this field.
If someone looking to the code c
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
marco atzeri wrote:
> I have no problem to patch Python to solve the issue,
> but I have not seen evidence of the dlsym mechanism .
> But of course I an NOT and expert in this field.
>
> If someone looking to the code can give me some hints,
> I will appreciate
I
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:56 AM Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
>
> Hi Corinna,
>
>
> It sounds very reasonable to me to deal with it within dlsym(),
> as the problem arises from the use of dlsym(). However, what
> happens if newly built .exe is linked to old dll which calls
> uname() via dlsym()?
Hi Corinna,
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 12:00:25 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> [Ping Mark Geisert]
>
> On Mar 3 18:56, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > Hi Corinna,
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:48:45 +0100
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Mar 2 20:03, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > > Th
Hi Corinna,
Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
[Ping Mark Geisert]
On Mar 3 18:56, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
Hi Corinna,
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:48:45 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 2 20:03, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
The following check code does not work as expected if
newl
[Ping Mark Geisert]
On Mar 3 18:56, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:48:45 +0100
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Mar 2 20:03, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > The following check code does not work as expected if
> > > > newly build exe file is linke
Hi Corinna,
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:48:45 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 2 20:03, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:25:42 +0900
> > Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:55:46 +0900
> > > Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:48:28 +0100
> > > >
On Mar 2 20:03, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:25:42 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:55:46 +0900
> > Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:48:28 +0100
> > > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > > On 20.02.2021 23:29, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > > > On Sa
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:25:42 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:55:46 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:48:28 +0100
> > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > On 20.02.2021 23:29, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:01:38 +0100
> > > > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:55:46 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:48:28 +0100
> Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > On 20.02.2021 23:29, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:01:38 +0100
> > > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > >> MC using latest snapshot 32bit 2021-02-19 (and 2021-02-10)
> > >>
>
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 12:59 PM Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:41:57 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:55:46 +0900
> > Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:48:28 +0100
> > > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > > On 20.02.2021 23:29, Takashi Yano wrot
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:41:57 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:55:46 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:48:28 +0100
> > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > On 20.02.2021 23:29, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:01:38 +0100
> > > > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:55:46 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:48:28 +0100
> Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > On 20.02.2021 23:29, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:01:38 +0100
> > > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > >> MC using latest snapshot 32bit 2021-02-19 (and 2021-02-10)
> > >>
>
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:48:28 +0100
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 20.02.2021 23:29, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:01:38 +0100
> > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >> MC using latest snapshot 32bit 2021-02-19 (and 2021-02-10)
> >>
> >> now fails at startup with
> >>
> >> Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIO
On 20.02.2021 23:29, Takashi Yano wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:01:38 +0100
Marco Atzeri wrote:
MC using latest snapshot 32bit 2021-02-19 (and 2021-02-10)
now fails at startup with
Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=61083736
Thanks for the report. I found the cause of this issue.
I wi
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:01:38 +0100
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> MC using latest snapshot 32bit 2021-02-19 (and 2021-02-10)
>
> now fails at startup with
>
> Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=61083736
Thanks for the report. I found the cause of this issue.
I will submit a patch to fix it.
--
T
MC using latest snapshot 32bit 2021-02-19 (and 2021-02-10)
now fails at startup with
Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=61083736
eax= ebx=612F352C ecx=D4BFABF9 edx=0012 esi=0071C8AC
edi=0012
ebp= esp=Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=61083736
eax=
Hi Corinna,
If I'm forced to abandon Windows, the next logical option for me is to use
ReactOS, in order to use Cygwin for work.
While it is usable as it is, right now it only has 32 bit, and 64 bit is
still a long way to go.
This is one primary reason that I believe Cygwin should keep the 32bit
On Apr 8 10:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Right. This looks like a fork problem. It's 32 bit, so we have to
> expect fork errors more often.
>
> Given how much the distro has grown, and given that the number of 32 bit
> systems is constantly shrinking, we should really start to think about
> dr
On Apr 7 22:27, Csaba Ráduly via Cygwin wrote:
> On 07/04/2020 19:33, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
> > while trying to build the 32bit version on python,
> > I hit this never seen before issue:
> >
> > checking for %zd printf() format support... make: *** No targets
> > specified and no makefil
On 07/04/2020 19:33, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
while trying to build the 32bit version on python,
I hit this never seen before issue:
checking for %zd printf() format support... make: *** No targets specified and
no makefile found. Stop.
*** ERROR: make failed
4 [main] sh 18479 D:
while trying to build the 32bit version on python,
I hit this never seen before issue:
checking for %zd printf() format support... make: *** No targets
specified and no makefile found. Stop.
*** ERROR: make failed
4 [main] sh 18479 D:\cygwin32\bin\sh.exe: *** fatal error in
forked proce
38 matches
Mail list logo
