Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-22 Thread JonY
On 6/22/2014 12:24, René Berber wrote: > On 6/21/2014 9:13 PM, JonY wrote: > >> There you go again with all the implications, mingw32 code is cross >> compiled from Cygwin's point of view, so don't run it under Cygwin. Run >> it under cmd or something. >> >> Was that too hard to understand? > > Y

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-21 Thread René Berber
On 6/21/2014 9:13 PM, JonY wrote: There you go again with all the implications, mingw32 code is cross compiled from Cygwin's point of view, so don't run it under Cygwin. Run it under cmd or something. Was that too hard to understand? Yes, because its not true, the code runs fine under Cygwin

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-21 Thread JonY
On 6/22/2014 00:43, Arthur Schwarz wrote: >> /E/home/skidmarks/Projects/SLIP/slip/dist/Debug/mingw-Windows/slip.exe: >> error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-6.dll: cannot open >> shared object file: No such file or directory >> >> RUN FAILED (exit value 127, total time: 15ms) >> > > Yo

RE: Question on gcc install

2014-06-21 Thread Arthur Schwarz
On 6/20/2014 22:37, Arthur Schwarz wrote: > >> At the present time /bin/gcc.exe, etc., works. /bin/*mingw*.exe >> either compiles but does not link, or does not compile - which seems >> to be a > header >> issue. gcc -m32 does not work which may be a gcc.gnu issue. >> > > Can you at least be sp

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-20 Thread JonY
On 6/20/2014 22:37, Arthur Schwarz wrote: > >> At the present time /bin/gcc.exe, etc., works. /bin/*mingw*.exe either >> compiles but does not link, or does not compile - which seems to be a > header >> issue. gcc -m32 does not work which may be a gcc.gnu issue. >> > > Can you at least be specifi

RE: Question on gcc install

2014-06-20 Thread Arthur Schwarz
> At the present time /bin/gcc.exe, etc., works. /bin/*mingw*.exe either > compiles but does not link, or does not compile - which seems to be a header > issue. gcc -m32 does not work which may be a gcc.gnu issue. > Can you at least be specific about the errors? It is rather frustrating reading

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-20 Thread JonY
On 6/20/2014 07:58, Arthur Schwarz wrote: > Hi JonY; > > I hope that this clarifies some of the thing yous mentioned (as well as > others unmentioned). > > None of the toolchains are multilib capable, so -m32/-m64 is not going > to work. See also http://wiki.osdev.org/Target_Triplet >"> info

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-19 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 06/19/2014 07:58 PM, Arthur Schwarz wrote: Would it be possible to clarify that 64-bit compiler target Will only work on a compatible 64-bit gdb (same for 32-bit) and that in order to get gcc to generate code for 32-bit targets the setup-x86.exe must be used ant that in orde

RE: Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-19 Thread Arthur Schwarz
Hi JonY; I hope that this clarifies some of the thing yous mentioned (as well as others unmentioned). None of the toolchains are multilib capable, so -m32/-m64 is not going to work. See also http://wiki.osdev.org/Target_Triplet "> info gcc -> Option Index" shows -m32 and -m64 as valid Opti

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-18 Thread JonY
On 6/18/2014 23:11, Arthur Schwarz wrote: > I am including cygcheck.out as an attachment. > > Andrey Repin pointed out to me that my various e-mail responses are > scattered all over the mailing list. I am very sorry for this and hope that > at least this e-mail is put in the appropriate place so

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-18 Thread Csaba Raduly
Hi Arthur, On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Arthur Schwarz wrote: > Win7 > gcc 4.8.3 > Netbeans 7.4 > > Hi Csaba; > > I used setup.exe. In that case, the behavior is entirely up to what setup.exe can do and what the GCC packages tell it to do. setup.exe _can_ delete files (as opposed to GCC's o

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-17 Thread JonY
On 6/18/2014 05:33, Arthur Schwarz wrote: > Hi Larry; > > I think I mislead you. Netbeans is quite comfortable with cygwin, and I > believe demands it in a Windows environment. What Netbeans requires is the > exact oath to use for gcc, g++, gfortran, the assembler, make file, gdb, and > qmake (opt

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-17 Thread Arthur Schwarz
Hi Larry; I think I mislead you. Netbeans is quite comfortable with cygwin, and I believe demands it in a Windows environment. What Netbeans requires is the exact oath to use for gcc, g++, gfortran, the assembler, make file, gdb, and qmake (optional). The make file path and gdb are invariant. The

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-17 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 06/17/2014 12:31 PM, Arthur Schwarz wrote: The issue and confusion arise because I am using the Netbeans IDE, and Netbeans requires explicit reference to the gcc, g++, fortran compilers and assembler being used. I am running into difficulties. Sorry, I don't know anything about how to config

RE: Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-17 Thread Arthur Schwarz
Win7 gcc 4.8.3-? Netbeans 7.4 Hi csaba; I just downloaded the latest version of gcc (16 Jun version). Strangely enough, the [ANNOUNCEMENT] says that it is gcc 4.8.3-1 and the setup download says it is gcc 4.8.3-2. Sigh. There are some changes. The i686-pc-cygwin-gcc-4.8.2.exe x86_64-pc-

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-17 Thread Arthur Schwarz
Win7 gcc 4.8.3 Netbeans 7.4 Hi Csaba; I used setup.exe. The issue and confusion arise because I am using the Netbeans IDE, and Netbeans requires explicit reference to the gcc, g++, fortran compilers and assembler being used. I am running into difficulties. 1: mingw fails to link correctly. Hund

Re: Question on gcc install

2014-06-16 Thread Csaba Raduly
Hi Arthur, On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Arthur Schwarz wrote: > Does gcc delete old version of their software during an install. I just > installed gcc/mingw 4.8.3-2 and have all versions from 4.7.3 to 4.8.3-2 but > (I think) only libraries and etc. for 4.8.3-2. Am I responsible for deleting

Question on gcc install

2014-06-15 Thread Arthur Schwarz
Does gcc delete old version of their software during an install. I just installed gcc/mingw 4.8.3-2 and have all versions from 4.7.3 to 4.8.3-2 but (I think) only libraries and etc. for 4.8.3-2. Am I responsible for deleting these older references? Will these older references work with the newer li

Re: Dumb Question on GCC

2003-07-01 Thread Brian Dessent
Martin Gainty wrote: > > $ gcc SLPReg.c -L./ -llibcommonlibslp.a -llibcommonslpd.a > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.2/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: > cannot fi > nd -llibcommonlibslp.a > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > I put c files, o.files, lib and all files local in same direct

Re: Dumb Question on GCC

2003-07-01 Thread Jerry Heyman
gh I doubt it changes anything, I would also personally use: -L. rather than -L./ jerry > > - Original Message - > From: "Elfyn McBratney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Dumb Question on GCC

2003-07-01 Thread Martin Gainty
anything Is there any doc on how this works? Thanks, Martin - Original Message - From: "Elfyn McBratney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:53 PM Subject: Re: Dumb Question

Re: Dumb Question on GCC

2003-07-01 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Martin Gainty wrote: > GCC SlpReg.c > /cygdrive/h/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccwParH7.o(.text+0x11d):SLPReg.c > : un > defined reference to `_SLPOpen' > > My header file refers to function SLPOpen not _SLPOpen > The .c file calls SLPOpen not _SLPOpen Meaning? You declare

Dumb Question on GCC

2003-07-01 Thread Martin Gainty
GCC SlpReg.c /cygdrive/h/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccwParH7.o(.text+0x11d):SLPReg.c : un defined reference to `_SLPOpen' My header file refers to function SLPOpen not _SLPOpen The .c file calls SLPOpen not _SLPOpen Where does the leading underscore come from ? How do I shut it off the compi

question on gcc

2002-05-15 Thread Balint Kozman
Hi, I'm sorry if this was discussed before, but after looking at the mailing list archives, i still can't see the solution to my problem. I installed cygwin-1.3.10 using setup v2.218.2.6. After a full package installation gcc seems to be broken. If i try to compile anything, i get this erro