On 16 February 2006 01:49, skaller wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 17:41 +, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 15 February 2006 16:48, skaller wrote:
> []
>> Why are you asking this on the Cygwin list?
>
> Because I expect it is subscribed to by people who are dealing
> with portability issues on a regu
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 17:41 +, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 15 February 2006 16:48, skaller wrote:
[]
> Why are you asking this on the Cygwin list?
Because I expect it is subscribed to by people who are dealing
with portability issues on a regular basis, especially those
who are using Cygwin as a d
On 15 February 2006 16:48, skaller wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 07:22 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> There is no such thing as ming - it is mingw or mingw32. Furthermore,
>> cygwin only provides -mno-cygwin as a convenience, but it is NOT SUPPORTED
>> on this list. Ask the mingw list instead.
>
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 07:22 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> > CVS log entry for our systems says:
> >
> > * added WSAID_CONNECTEX and LPFN_CONNECTEX definitions for ming
> > (nocygwin) target
>
> There is no such thing as ming - it is mingw or mingw32. Furthermore,
> cygwin only provides -mno-cygwi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to skaller on 2/14/2006 12:31 AM:
> We have done some things in a possibly non-optimal way,
> someone may wish to comment on a better way to do these things?
>
> CVS log entry for our systems says:
>
> * added WSAID_CONNECTEX and LPFN_CONNE
We have done some things in a possibly non-optimal way,
someone may wish to comment on a better way to do these things?
CVS log entry for our systems says:
* added WSAID_CONNECTEX and LPFN_CONNECTEX definitions for ming
(nocygwin) target
* now conditionally define EAGAIN in posix compat layer b
6 matches
Mail list logo
