Re: pdksh installation

2003-03-03 Thread Elfyn McBratney
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 04:32:29PM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > >True. And I speak for the package maintainer here, of course. If there was a > >problem with one of the package files that had not already been discovered > >it would be nice to let him (me) know about it, if it hadn't already be

Re: pdksh installation

2003-03-03 Thread Elfyn McBratney
> > I am also looking forward to the release of a built-in ksh for > > Cygwin. > > > > And, I can see that you wouldn't want to bug the maintainer with > > frivilous questions that would delay what you are looking for. > > > > However, I don't see a problem with making and playing in your > > own m

Re: pdksh installation

2003-03-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 04:32:29PM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote: >True. And I speak for the package maintainer here, of course. If there was a >problem with one of the package files that had not already been discovered >it would be nice to let him (me) know about it, if it hadn't already been >repo

Re: pdksh installation

2003-03-03 Thread Elfyn McBratney
> I am also looking forward to the release of a built-in ksh for > Cygwin. > > And, I can see that you wouldn't want to bug the maintainer with > frivilous questions that would delay what you are looking for. > > However, I don't see a problem with making and playing in your > own mud-puddle. Here

Re: pdksh installation

2003-03-03 Thread Elfyn McBratney
> "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > >On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, you (whoever you are) wrote: > > >>I have read in the cygwin-apps list that pdksh is available. Until it > > >>is of

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-27 Thread BB
"Paul Coltrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I am also looking forward to the release of a built-in ksh for > Cygwin. > > And, I can see that you wouldn't want to bug the maintainer with > frivilous questions that would delay what you are looking for. > > However,

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-27 Thread Paul Coltrin
I am also looking forward to the release of a built-in ksh for Cygwin. And, I can see that you wouldn't want to bug the maintainer with frivilous questions that would delay what you are looking for. However, I don't see a problem with making and playing in your own mud-puddle. Here is what I

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-27 Thread BB
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:06:25AM -0600, BB wrote: > >Well, I guess this would be the wrong mailing list for the question. > >Perhaps 'applications' would have been the correct place. But, I still > >think the ques

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-27 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:06:25AM -0600, BB wrote: >Well, I guess this would be the wrong mailing list for the question. >Perhaps 'applications' would have been the correct place. But, I still >think the question is a good on that deserves and answer. I'm sure that >those that do know how to ins

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-27 Thread BB
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, you (whoever you are) wrote: > >>I have read in the cygwin-apps list that pdksh is available. Until it > >>is officially an

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-27 Thread BB
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, you (whoever you are) wrote: > >>I have read in the cygwin-apps list that pdksh is available. Until it > >>is officially an

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, you (whoever you are) wrote: >>I have read in the cygwin-apps list that pdksh is available. Until it >>is officially announced and available in the package list, what is the >>correct procedure for installing

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-26 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > YOWTWYWT. Now this *screams* for an FAQ entry (right up there with ). Or will in a few days... Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-26 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, you (whoever you are) wrote: > I have read in the cygwin-apps list that pdksh is available. Until it is > officially announced and available in the package list, what is the correct > procedure for installing it? Can I use the setup program to install it? > > I guess this qu

Re: pdksh installation

2003-02-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 11:45:37AM -0600, BB wrote: >I have read in the cygwin-apps list that pdksh is available. Until it is >officially announced and available in the package list, what is the correct >procedure for installing it? Can I use the setup program to install it? > >I guess this quest

pdksh installation

2003-02-26 Thread BB
I have read in the cygwin-apps list that pdksh is available. Until it is officially announced and available in the package list, what is the correct procedure for installing it? Can I use the setup program to install it? I guess this question applies to any new package that is not officially rel