s+up%3A+Problems+with+parallel+make%22+site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fcygwin.com%2F
>Please try the test version of the package
>https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-announce/2023-March/010972.html
>
>and let us know it the 4.4.1-2 version solves your problem
Current version of make (4.4.1-1)
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 3:34 PM Jon Beniston via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jon
> When trying to build gcc using make with -j N, I'm finding that make will
> hang on 64-bit Cygwin. I don't see this problem with 32-bit Cygwin on the
> same PC. When it hangs, there are N make processes reported in task
Hi,
When trying to build gcc using make with -j N, I'm finding that make will
hang on 64-bit Cygwin. I don't see this problem with 32-bit Cygwin on the
same PC. When it hangs, there are N make processes reported in task manager
that are using 0% CPU, that appear to be waiting for N sh.exe progr
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:03:55PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:15:19PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
make -j does work in cygwin, to an extent. If you try to use too many
processes, cygwin seems to flip out. -j20 does
t; disk cache is empty, -j4 speeds it up about 40%. When the build system
> > > is cached, -j slows things down by a few percent. This is dealing with
> > > 1 processor. Of course, if you have multiple processors, the speed
> > > should scale linearly (with 4 cpu&
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:35:05PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>First off, if you're willing to forgo the ability to access UNC paths
>from Cygwin, you can set your Cygdrive prefix to '//' to address the
>drives in the same way you did in your old GNU toolset
But not for long...
cgf
--
Unsub
empty, -j4 speeds it up about 40%. When the build system
> > is cached, -j slows things down by a few percent. This is dealing with
> > 1 processor. Of course, if you have multiple processors, the speed
> > should scale linearly (with 4 cpu's, -j4 is about 70% faster).
>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:03:55PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:15:19PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>>>make -j does work in cygwin, to an extent. If you try to use too many
>>>processes, cygwin seems to flip out. -j20 does seem to work fine
>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:15:19PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
make -j does work in cygwin, to an extent. If you try to use too many
processes, cygwin seems to flip out. -j20 does seem to work fine though
(it only starts acting strang around -j100).
More likely it "f
lberger wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > Currently our build environment uses parallel make (-j jobs option) on all
> > our unixes using gnu tools. We use an older version of gnu tools on our
> > windows boxes. The older make on the windows box does not do parallel
> > ma
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:15:19PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>make -j does work in cygwin, to an extent. If you try to use too many
>processes, cygwin seems to flip out. -j20 does seem to work fine though
>(it only starts acting strang around -j100).
More likely it "flips out" around -j62 or
build environment uses parallel make (-j jobs option) on all
our unixes using gnu tools. We use an older version of gnu tools on our
windows boxes. The older make on the windows box does not do parallel
make (or at least correctly). I want to upgrade to the latest cygwin to
see if parallel make
Hi folks,
Currently our build environment uses parallel make (-j jobs option) on all
our unixes using gnu tools. We use an older version of gnu tools on our
windows boxes. The older make on the windows box does not do parallel
make (or at least correctly). I want to upgrade to the latest cygwin
13 matches
Mail list logo
