mail, something may go wrong in the VM
>>> for building packages.
>>> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2025-April/257948.html
>>>
>>> Many files/directories don't have permissions for non-privileged users.
>>> These packages are examples I fou
On 22/04/2025 22:06, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 03:48:19 +0900, ggl329 via Cygwin
wrote:
Hi all,
As Jon mentioned in the following mail, something may go wrong in the VM for
building packages.
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2025-April/257948.html
Many files
On 4/22/2025 5:06 PM, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 03:48:19 +0900, ggl329 via Cygwin
wrote:
Hi all,
As Jon mentioned in the following mail, something may go wrong in the VM for
building packages.
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2025-April/257948.html
Many files
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 03:48:19 +0900, ggl329 via Cygwin
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>As Jon mentioned in the following mail, something may go wrong in the VM for
>building packages.
>https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2025-April/257948.html
>
>Many files/directories don'
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 03:48:19 +0900, ggl329 via Cygwin
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>As Jon mentioned in the following mail, something may go wrong in the VM for
>building packages.
>https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2025-April/257948.html
>
>Many files/directories don'
Hi all,
As Jon mentioned in the following mail, something may go wrong in the VM for
building packages.
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2025-April/257948.html
Many files/directories don't have permissions for non-privileged users.
These packages are examples I found. Other package
Question: Is anyone working on Python3.12-* packages? The Cygwin Python 3.12
works but is missing a package needed by a newer version of Ansible and I can
not pip install that needed python package (some crypto related issue I think)
hence I can not also pip install a newer version of Ansible
Requirement already satisfied: setuptools in
/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages (75.8.0)
Requirement already satisfied: pip in
/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages (25.0.1)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 4:38 AM Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin <
cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote:
> Try these, seemingly n
Try these, seemingly not pulled from installing python39:
python-setuptools-wheel
python-pip-wheel
I confirm the issue with a fresh install with python3{8,9}. pip is
provided, but `ensurepip` gives that error. I think it should be the
opposite on a basic python install: No pip package sho
")
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/ensurepip/__init__.py", line 27, in
_get_most_recent_wheel_version
return str(max(_wheels[pkg], key=distutils.version.LooseVersion))
ValueError: max() arg is an empty sequence
chatgpt did suggest that cygwin had issues with ensurepip
On Wed, Mar 5, 2
wrote:
> > Hello,
> > after upgrading to Cygport-0.37.0-1, I discovered that all binary
> > packages created with MinGW-w64 have a "-noarch" suffix appended to
> > their name.
> > Binary and debuginfo packages are affected, source packages are not.
> > This is
On 30/03/2025 13:11, Carlo B. via Cygwin wrote:
Hello,
after upgrading to Cygport-0.37.0-1, I discovered that all binary
packages created with MinGW-w64 have a "-noarch" suffix appended to
their name.
Binary and debuginfo packages are affected, source packages are not.
This is an exam
Carlo B. via Cygwin writes:
> Hello,
> after upgrading to Cygport-0.37.0-1, I discovered that all binary
> packages created with MinGW-w64 have a "-noarch" suffix appended to
> their name.
[…]
> Is it normal or it is a bug?
Read the announcement, perhaps?
Regards,
A
Hello,
after upgrading to Cygport-0.37.0-1, I discovered that all binary
packages created with MinGW-w64 have a "-noarch" suffix appended to
their name.
Binary and debuginfo packages are affected, source packages are not.
This is an example output when I tried to refresh one of m
Hi,
I have installed the following Python packages:
* python39
* python39-devel
* python39-pip
Then I've run `python3.9 -m venv venv`, which results in:
> Error: Command
'['/home/daab/build-essentials/venv/bin/python3.9.exe', '-Im',
'ensurepip',
rk on colorama and I will add also alternatives
Regards
Marco
Hi Jon,
I am uploading all the packages needed to have "tox" again functional
python-cachetools-5.5.2-1
python-colorama-0.4.6-1
python-pyproject_api-1.9.0-1
python-tox-4.24.1-2 (usi
other issue (same for 312)
$ tox3.9 --version
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/tox3.9", line 5, in
..
from tox.report import HandledError
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/tox/report.py", line 16, in
from colorama import Fore, Style, init
Modul
On 02/02/2025 16:00, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-announce wrote:
New test releases for
python312 3.12.8-2
idle312 3.12.8-2
python312-devel 3.12.8-2
python312-test 3.12.8-2
python312-tkinter 3.12.8-2
On IRC, my attention was drawn to this
On 2025-02-08 09:57, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 08/02/2025 16:37, Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
Hello!
Is there a list of packages (including all their dependencies!) which
are installed by Cygwin setup.exe by default, e.g. start installer,
click
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 08/02/2025 16:37, Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
Hello!
Is there a list of packages (including all their dependencies!) which
are installed by Cygwin setup.exe by default, e.g. start installer,
click everything "yes", but do not select any extr
On 08/02/2025 16:37, Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
Hello!
Is there a list of packages (including all their dependencies!) which
are installed by Cygwin setup.exe by default, e.g. start installer,
click everything "yes", but do not select any extra packages?
Thanks,
Martin
L
Hello!
Is there a list of packages (including all their dependencies!) which
are installed by Cygwin setup.exe by default, e.g. start installer,
click everything "yes", but do not select any extra packages?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problem
On 12/4/2024 5:46 PM, Mark via Cygwin wrote:
Is there, actually, a method to bypass this issue?
Will there be some tricks, in next package distribuition, to bypass this
issue/limitation?
Run cygwin setup with -p if you have a proxy application available that
does the thing exactly as you have as
6:50 AM UTC+4
To: 'Ilya Basin' ,
Subject: R: "setup-x86_64.exe" blocked by Proxy/Firewall to 3MB packages
Hello.
Thanks for replying 😊
I really don't how the Company set up the Proxy System... i think it's the
Company AV (i see the Antivirus CA not the re
e the Antivirus CA?
Original Message
From: Mark via Cygwin
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 at 12:46 PM UTC+4
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: "setup-x86_64.exe" blocked by Proxy/Firewall to 3MB packages
Hello.
We have a Proxy/AV/Firewall which blocks internet downloads
On 2024-12-04 01:46, Mark via Cygwin wrote:
We have a Proxy/AV/Firewall which blocks internet downloads to max 3MB size,
then they truncate the file.
So, for example, downloading VIM-COMMON package, which sizes about 6MB, the
xz is truncated to 3MB and the installation fails, obviously.
Is there,
Hello.
We have a Proxy/AV/Firewall which blocks internet downloads to max 3MB size,
then they truncate the file.
So, for example, downloading VIM-COMMON package, which sizes about 6MB, the
xz is truncated to 3MB and the installation fails, obviously.
Is there, actually, a method to bypass this i
Confirming or denying
> that hypothesis would also be useful.
I would suggest using MSYS2's Python 3.12 as a starting point for porting and
investigating the hanging issue. MSYS2 has had a working Python 3.12 for a
while now and as it is a fork of Cygwin I would assume would speed up
On 15/09/2024 12:08, Michael Cook via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat Dec 23 03:54:54 GMT 2023 Marco Atzeri wrote:
Python 3.12 will be in the near future introduced and we will skip 3.10 and
3.11.
Is there a place where I can find the latest status of this effort?
And how can I help?
I'm afraid it seems
On Sat Dec 23 03:54:54 GMT 2023 Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Python 3.12 will be in the near future introduced and we will skip 3.10 and
3.11.
Is there a place where I can find the latest status of this effort?
And how can I help?
Michael
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On 2024-09-06 13:29, Sherman, William via Cygwin wrote:
When I run the Cygwin installer from the command line at work - specifying
-no-admin -- I see a "Download Incomplete" pop-up for 2 packages. This has
been happening for about a month.
This is a text representation of the pop-u
Hi,
When I run the Cygwin installer from the command line at work - specifying
-no-admin -- I see a "Download Incomplete" pop-up for 2 packages. This has been
happening for about a month.
This is a text representation of the pop-up that I'm seeing:
Download Incomplete
The foll
On 8/26/2024 11:40 PM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 07:25:55 +
"Krishna, Chaitra via Cygwin" wrote:
In 2017, we qualified our programs using Cygwin 2.8.1. Unfortunately, we no
longer have the source code packages and have been unable to locate them
online.
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 07:25:55 +
"Krishna, Chaitra via Cygwin" wrote:
> In 2017, we qualified our programs using Cygwin 2.8.1. Unfortunately, we no
> longer have the source code packages and have been unable to locate them
> online. Could you please assist us by providing a
Hi,
In 2017, we qualified our programs using Cygwin 2.8.1. Unfortunately, we no
longer have the source code packages and have been unable to locate them
online. Could you please assist us by providing any links, sites, or
repositories where we can download the source packages for Cygwin 2.8.0
x27;user_picked' packages from installed.db and pass it via -P to setup.
But in this new installation, all non-Base packages will appear in
"Unneeded" view then.
I guess this is not a regression but longstanding behavior.
Hmm... I certainly envisioned it working that way when I add
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 12:42 PM matthew patton via Cygwin
wrote:
> Cygwin has an incredible amount of coverage, but it could be pared down to
> 20 packages and I'd be perfectly happy.
>
I suspect most people are in this same position, except that they each have
a different list
welcome that - and replacing the default 'link' to be 'mklink' links instead of
Junctions which some Windows programs do NOT like and fail.
For everything else there is WSL. Seriously. Cygwin has an incredible amount of
coverage, but it could be pared down to 20 packages and
come with qemu packages?
why should an "Unix Emulation layer" that run in "User Space"
trying to run a "Full-system emulation" (https://www.qemu.org/) ?
It seems like using square wheels
Nope. The Qemu packages on LInux have a much more wider functionality,
and
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 18:33, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
>
> On 2023-12-18 00:14, Dan Shelton via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 07:54, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
> >> On 18/12/2023 07:42, Dan Shelton via Cygwin wrote:
> >>> Does Cygwin come with
t download mirror list. Only use
> sites
>specified with -s
> ..
> -s --site Download site URL, path or UNC path
> The default is to both download and install packages, unless either
> --download or --local-install is specified.
> ---
On 2023-12-18 00:14, Dan Shelton via Cygwin wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 07:54, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 18/12/2023 07:42, Dan Shelton via Cygwin wrote:
Does Cygwin come with qemu packages?
why should an "Unix Emulation layer" that run in "User Space"
trying t
On 18/12/2023 10:57, Cedric Blancher via Cygwin wrote:
Good morning!
Can Cygwin setup.exe be modified to support more than one package
repository, e.g. first the default Cygwin package repro, and then a
company package repro (e.g. fr.pasteur.cygwin.packages ?).
The source code is available, so
download mirror list. Only use sites
specified with -s
..
-s --site Download site URL, path or UNC path
The default is to both download and install packages, unless either
--download or -
Good morning!
Can Cygwin setup.exe be modified to support more than one package
repository, e.g. first the default Cygwin package repro, and then a
company package repro (e.g. fr.pasteur.cygwin.packages ?).
Ced
--
Cedric Blancher
[https://plus.google.com/u/0/+CedricBlancher/]
Institute Pasteur
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 07:54, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2023 07:42, Dan Shelton via Cygwin wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Does Cygwin come with qemu packages?
> >
> > Dan
>
> why should an "Unix Emulation layer" that run in &
On 18/12/2023 07:42, Dan Shelton via Cygwin wrote:
Hello!
Does Cygwin come with qemu packages?
Dan
why should an "Unix Emulation layer" that run in "User Space"
trying to run a "Full-system emulation" (https://www.qemu.org/) ?
It seems like using square whee
Hello!
Does Cygwin come with qemu packages?
Dan
--
Dan Shelton - Cluster Specialist Win/Lin/Bsd
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com
UPDATE:
Running "cygcheck -rvs" on the updated installation (after all the "Unneeded"
packages were gone),
revealed that a few packages had become "Incomplete":
base-files
libMagickCore6_6
libMagickCore7_9
perl
perl-mapages
squid
I re-ran Setup and chose these pa
Hi All,
I was updating my Cygwin installation at home and that had accumulated some
"Unneeded" packages, which were very hard to deal with:
The default disposition is "Keep" (while logically, since they are "safe to be
removed", it should have been "Unins
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 3:26 PM Anderson via Cygwin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to know if have a limit of packages to install on packages params on
> cygwin setup command line.
>
> I put many packages but some packages are not installed.
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi Anderson,
Hi,
I need to know if have a limit of packages to install on packages params on
cygwin setup command line.
I put many packages but some packages are not installed.
Thanks.
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023, Brian Inglis wrote:
> As 32 bit Windows systems are no longer getting security updates,
> recommendations for similar legacy systems include running them in VMs with
> access to update executables and libraries blocked.
There is a 32-bit variant of Windows 10; Windows 10 is s
On 2023-04-19 05:30, Carlo B. via Cygwin wrote:
after the 32-bit port of CYGWIN has been obsoleted, I was looking for
a way for installing or upgrading the NOARCH packages, like the
libraries for the mingw cross compilers for example.
Unfortunately, I have not found an existing way for doing it
On 19/04/2023 12:30, Carlo B. via Cygwin wrote:
Hello,
after the 32-bit port of CYGWIN has been obsoleted, I was looking for
a way for installing or upgrading the NOARCH packages, like the
libraries for the mingw cross compilers for example.
Unfortunately, I have not found an existing way for
Hello,
after the 32-bit port of CYGWIN has been obsoleted, I was looking for
a way for installing or upgrading the NOARCH packages, like the
libraries for the mingw cross compilers for example.
Unfortunately, I have not found an existing way for doing it.
Is it possible to do it?
Otherwise, I&#
On 28/03/2023 17:55, Bill Stewart via Cygwin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 2:55 PM Jon Turney wrote:
Sorry, based on the previous discussion at [1] this seems to be broken
at the moment, due to '-x' being broken.
[1] https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2023-February/252994.html
I think I h
://devguide.python.org/versions/#versions
The main packages include postinstall script that
use "alternatives" to define for
/usr/bin/python
/usr/bin/python3
/usr/bin/idle3
/usr/bin/pydoc3
a default to the highest package available.
$ alternatives --display python
python - status is a
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 2:55 PM Jon Turney wrote:
Sorry, based on the previous discussion at [1] this seems to be broken
> at the moment, due to '-x' being broken.
>
> [1] https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2023-February/252994.html
>
> If you really need this, please try old setup versions from
ckage3" -P
"package1,package2,package3"'
An option which explicitly just installs the source for a specified
package might be useful.
It seems that
--local-install -x "package[,...]" -P "package[,...]"
...no longer works to automate source download f
etup -I -x "package1,package2,package3" -P
>> "package1,package2,package3"'
>>
>> An option which explicitly just installs the source for a specified
>> package might be useful.
>>
>
> It seems that
>
> --local-install -x "pack
2,package3"'
>
> An option which explicitly just installs the source for a specified
> package might be useful.
>
It seems that
--local-install -x "package[,...]" -P "package[,...]"
...no longer works to automate source download for packages already
i
On 18/11/2022 14:32, Keith Christian wrote:
Carlo,
Since you are successfully creating Cygwin packages, one thing that
would be very helpful is a detailed set of instructions for cygport to
create a Cygwin package from source.
There are instructions posted on the Cygwin website and other info
On 17/11/2022 15:18, Carlo B. wrote:
Hello,
at this address I did a repository of packages that I made for CYGWIN:
https://github.com/carlo-bramini/packages-cygwin
Sometimes, when I need something not existing (or newer) into the
official list of packages for CYGWIN, I upload it here.
All
Carlo,
Since you are successfully creating Cygwin packages, one thing that
would be very helpful is a detailed set of instructions for cygport to
create a Cygwin package from source.
There are instructions posted on the Cygwin website and other info
about cygport, but I have not found a
On 11/17/2022 10:18 AM, Carlo B. wrote:
Hello,
at this address I did a repository of packages that I made for CYGWIN:
https://github.com/carlo-bramini/packages-cygwin
Sometimes, when I need something not existing (or newer) into the
official list of packages for CYGWIN, I upload it here.
All
Hello,
at this address I did a repository of packages that I made for CYGWIN:
https://github.com/carlo-bramini/packages-cygwin
Sometimes, when I need something not existing (or newer) into the
official list of packages for CYGWIN, I upload it here.
All these packages exists also in all major
I have uploaded updates:
unicode-ucd 15.0
unicode-cldr 42
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Carlo B. writes:
> Actually, if you get the "src" packages of openssl for mingw64 and you
> try to build them with cygport, it happens that includes, DLLs and
> libraries are installed directly into the *REAL* destination
> directory, into:
>
> /usr/x86_64-w64-m
Hello,
if you look these packages:
mingw64-x86_64-openssl-1.1.1q-0.1
mingw64-x86_64-openssl-1.1.1p-0.1
mingw64-i686-openssl-1.1.1q-0.1
mingw64-i686-openssl-1.1.1p-0.1
they are EMPTY.
For example, the content of mingw64-x86_64-openssl-1.1.1q-0.1 is:
usr/
usr/share/
usr/share/doc/
usr/share/doc
Hello,
I'm using Python 3.9 from Cygwin. Some packages have a package version
of 0.0.0 instead of their actual version which makes pip unhappy:
$ pip list | grep 0.0.0
importlib-metadata0.0.0
iniconfig 0.0.0
zipp 0.0.0
$ pip
win/ -IP
> > bash-completion -R 'C:\cygwin64'
> >
> > I'd expected this to select and automatically install the source package
> > for bash-completion. In fact, "bash-completion" does show up in the
> > list of pending packages, but the &qu
uot;bash-completion" does show up in the
list of pending packages, but the "Src?" column is unchecked and greyed
out; I can't even select it manually in the GUI selection tool.
Unsurprisingly, when I continue through the installer, the source
package doesn't get installed. I
7;C:\Users\Adam\Downloads' -s
http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/sourceware.org/pub/cygwin/ -IP
bash-completion -R 'C:\cygwin64'
I'd expected this to select and automatically install the source package
for bash-completion. In fact, "bash-completion" does show up
x27; version is /usr/bin/python3.9.
The following link are not provided anymore.
/usr/bin/idle
/usr/bin/pydoc
Rationale:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/
In other systems as Debian
/usr/bin/python is discouraged.
As on Cygwin we have still several third packages depending on
python
Adam Dinwoodie writes:
>> Patches to cygport to make this work better welcome!
>
> I _think_ most -- if not all -- the cygport infrastructure is already in
> place: cygport clearly already supports both virtual packages and
> "provides" listings, which are the only b
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:42:56PM +, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 16/02/2022 11:45, marco atzeri wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:11 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> > >
> > > While wrangling a bunch of Python packages for my Cygwin installation,
> > > I&#
Joshua Dunbar writes:
> Why was openldap-server
> (https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/openldap-server.html)
> considered obsoleted by
> (https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/openldap.html)? The openldap
> package only contains the client utilities. I am in need of sl
On 16/02/2022 11:45, marco atzeri wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:11 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
While wrangling a bunch of Python packages for my Cygwin installation,
I've noticed an inconsistency about how python3 vs python3x packages are
installed.
Only one ? ;-)
As an example
Hey,
Why was openldap-server
(https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/openldap-server.html) considered
obsoleted by (https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/openldap.html)? The
openldap package only contains the client utilities. I am in need of slapd (the
ldap standalone daemon) which was
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:11 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>
> While wrangling a bunch of Python packages for my Cygwin installation,
> I've noticed an inconsistency about how python3 vs python3x packages are
> installed.
Only one ? ;-)
> As an example: the python3 package its
While wrangling a bunch of Python packages for my Cygwin installation,
I've noticed an inconsistency about how python3 vs python3x packages are
installed.
As an example: the python3 package itself describes itself as a
meta-package; the package itself is almost empty, and the key thing
sele
New versions of
x86/x86_64 arch
octave-communications-1.2.4-1
octave-control-3.4.0-1
octave-fits-1.0.8-0.2
octave-instrument-control-0.7.1-1
octave-interval-3.2.1-1
for Octave 6.4 are available in the Cygwin distribution:
ADVISE
To load any package before usage run
"pkg load "
see
On 2022-01-31 05:18, Jon Turney wrote:
On 31/01/2022 07:55, Brian Inglis wrote:
In the URLs shown for git/cygwin-packages repo access:
URL git://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
http://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
ssh://cygwin@cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
On 31/01/2022 07:55, Brian Inglis wrote:
In the URLs shown for git/cygwin-packages repo access:
URL git://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
http://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
ssh://cygwin@cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
the web URL fails and should be
On Jan 31 00:55, Brian Inglis wrote:
> In the URLs shown for git/cygwin-packages repo access:
>
> URL git://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
> http://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
> ssh://cygwin@cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
>
> the web
In the URLs shown for git/cygwin-packages repo access:
URL git://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
http://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
ssh://cygwin@cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/PKG.git
the web URL fails and should be:
https://cygwin.com/git/?p=git
Subject: foo-0.30.2-1
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* biosig 2.3.3-1
Biosig provides a number tools for biomedical signal processing. It
includes libbiosig, which supports reading of over 50 data formats and
writing of about 10 data formats. It
rent `best' version is /usr/bin/python3.9.
The following link are not provided anymore.
/usr/bin/idle
/usr/bin/pydoc
Rationale:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/
In other systems as Debian
/usr/bin/python is discouraged.
As on Cygwin we have still several third packages depending on
python
New release for
idle39-3.9.10-1
python39-3.9.10-1
python39-devel-3.9.10-1
python39-test-3.9.10-1
python39-tkinter-3.9.10-1
python39-doc-3.9.10-1
and virtual packages that pull the 3.9 version ones
idle3-3.9.10-1
python3-3.9.10-1
python3-devel-3.9.10-1
python3-test-3.9.10-1
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Marco Atzeri"
> To: "Tatsuro MATSUOKA"
> Cc: "The Cygwin Mailing List"
> Date: 2022/01/11 火 07:46
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: python 3.9 packages
>
>
> On 10.01.2022 14:09, mar
On 10.01.2022 14:09, marco atzeri wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 8:26 AM Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
From: "Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-announce"
To: "cygwin
Date: 2022/01/09 日 22:35
Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: python 3.9 packages
Several python packages have been adde
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 8:26 AM Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> > From: "Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-announce"
> > To: "cygwin
> > Date: 2022/01/09 日 22:35
> > Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: python 3.9 packages
> >
> >
> > Several python packages
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-announce"
> To: "cygwin
> Date: 2022/01/09 日 22:35
> Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: python 3.9 packages
>
>
> Several python packages have been added to the Cygwin distribution
>
Several python packages have been added to the Cygwin distribution
and at the same time the equivalent packages for 3.6/3.7/3.8
have been uploaded.
python-hypothesis-6.35.0-1
python-pip-21.3.1-2
python-virtualenv-20.13.0-1
python-wheel-0.37.1-1
python-numpy-1.22.0-1
CHANGES
latest
New versions of
noarch
octave-ga-0.10.2-1
octave-generate_html-0.3.2-1
octave-matgeom-1.2.3-1
octave-optics-0.1.4-1
octave-splines-1.3.4-1
octave-statistics-1.4.3-1
x86/x86_64 arch
octave-communications-1.2.3-1
octave-control-3.3.1-1
octave-database-2.4.4-2
On 31.12.2021 20:33, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 5:27 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
$ python3.9 -m sysconfig | grep CFLAGS
CFLAGS = "-Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall
..
These flags will end up in builds of user Python packages with exten
bug-prefix-map=/pub/devel/python/python39/python39-3.9.9-1.x86_64/src/Python-3.9.9=/usr/src/debug/python39-3.9.9-1"
>
> These flags will end up in builds of user Python packages with extensions
> via sysconfig/distutils.
> This should be fixed by putting the necessary flags for the
Several python packages have been added to the Cygwin distribution
and at the same time the equivalent packages for 3.6/3./3.8
have been uploaded.
test for
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin/2021-December/250304.html
python393.9.9-3 (test)
idle39
On 28.12.2021 03:19, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 28.12.2021 02:27, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
$ python3.9 -m sysconfig | grep CFLAGS
Hi Matthias,
can you please verify the test package
python39-3.9.9-3 (not the -2)
$ python3.9 -m sysconfig | grep CFLAGS
BASECFLAGS = "-Wno-unused-result -Wsig
1 - 100 of 1811 matches
Mail list logo
