> > From: mappu
> >
> > P.S. please CC, i'm not subscribed to list
> >
>
> So subscribe already.
Or, read the list on the web at
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/current/threads.html.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentat
> From: mappu
>
> P.S. please CC, i'm not subscribed to list
>
So subscribe already. Someone not interested enough in an Open Project to join
a support list to even offer help who then demands an upgrade of some package
distributed by that project needs to be banned from even posting to th
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 19:36 +1300, mappu wrote:
> xz 5.2 with cool new parallel compression options is available since
> about one month.
>
> This is a gentle nudge for package maintainer, (whose effort is very
> appreciated) Was this update noticed please?
It was, but it just hi
Hi,
xz 5.2 with cool new parallel compression options is available since
about one month.
This is a gentle nudge for package maintainer, (whose effort is very
appreciated) Was this update noticed please?
or How do i identify who maintains a package for cygwin? to guess if the
maintainer is
On 10/31/2013 00:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:.
>
> I restrict the filenames that can be uploaded and neglected to add '+'.
> I just added it now so you will have to upload those files again. Sorry
> for the inconvenience.
>
Done, reuploaded.
>> Strange that I did not get any errors on my end,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:00:58PM +0800, JonY wrote:
>On 10/30/2013 22:42, marco atzeri wrote:
>> Il 10/30/2013 2:52 PM, Christopher Faylor ha scritto:
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:39AM -0500, Trent Bradley wrote:
I didn't see this mentioned anywhere yet, but there appears to be a
v
On 10/30/2013 22:42, marco atzeri wrote:
> Il 10/30/2013 2:52 PM, Christopher Faylor ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:39AM -0500, Trent Bradley wrote:
>>> I didn't see this mentioned anywhere yet, but there appears to be a
>>> version mismatch between gcc-core and gcc-g++.
>>>
>>> gcc-c
Il 10/30/2013 2:52 PM, Christopher Faylor ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:39AM -0500, Trent Bradley wrote:
I didn't see this mentioned anywhere yet, but there appears to be a
version mismatch between gcc-core and gcc-g++.
gcc-core is listed as having 4.8.2-1 available, gcc-g++ is stil
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:39AM -0500, Trent Bradley wrote:
>I didn't see this mentioned anywhere yet, but there appears to be a
>version mismatch between gcc-core and gcc-g++.
>
>gcc-core is listed as having 4.8.2-1 available, gcc-g++ is still at 4.8.1-3.
>
>Updating gcc-core (and libgcc1 with
On 08/08/2010 00:00, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> So I have sjlj backwards. I will fix that. Then the following I am not
> sure about.
>
> --disable-__cxa_atexit
>
> --enable-static --enable-shared --enable-shared-libgcc
>
> Shall I include these?
Yes, do. I think they're mostly the default anyw
On 08/07/2010 01:13 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
On 07/08/2010 17:59, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Hi,
Who is the Cygwin gcc package maintainer?
I've been a bit AWOL recently, but I think that's still me :-/
I want to make sure my
gfortran 4.6 experimental builds are consistent w
On 07/08/2010 17:59, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who is the Cygwin gcc package maintainer?
I've been a bit AWOL recently, but I think that's still me :-/
> I want to make sure my
> gfortran 4.6 experimental builds are consistent with Cygwin
> distributions
Hi,
Who is the Cygwin gcc package maintainer? I want to make sure my gfortran 4.6
experimental builds are consistent with Cygwin distributions. I notice I have
far fewer configure parameters then I see when I invoke gfortran -v .
Regards,
Jerry
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 21 13:43, Gary . wrote:
> > Is the list at http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint current?
[...]
> > links-1.00pre20-1-cygwin.patch file:
> > +- version 1.00pre20-1 -
> > +- New maintainer, 2007-08-12 Jari Aalto.
> > +- New upstream release.
>
> Oh, right, I fix
> The file is maintained by mere human beings...
There was discussion a while back about adding a maintainer field to
setup.hint. It seems like a good idea. Is there any intention to
implement that any time soon?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On Jan 21 13:43, Gary . wrote:
> Is the list at http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint current? Because I
> downloaded the source to the allegedly orphaned "links" ["ORPHANED
> (Harold L Hunt II)"] and found the following comment in the
> links-1.00pre20-1-cygwin.patch file:
> +- version 1.00pre20-
Is the list at http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint current? Because I
downloaded the source to the allegedly orphaned "links" ["ORPHANED
(Harold L Hunt II)"] and found the following comment in the
links-1.00pre20-1-cygwin.patch file:
+- version 1.00pre20-1 -
+- New maintainer, 2007-08-12 Jar
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 06:07:37PM -0700, Keith Christian wrote:
>I've used Cygwin's expect for a couple of years in sporadic automation
>and it works well.
>
>One thing that is useful and which is missing from the Cygwin package
>is the "autoexpect" program, which I copied from the source tarball.
xpect from the sourceware.org src repository but
>> that version has disappeared. I asked the person responsible for the
>> disappearance if they would like to become the new package maintainer
>> for Cygwin and they said yes but that never materialized.
>>
>> The def
ken, so it should be easy for
whomever becomes the next maintainer.
Keith
--- On Sat, 8/16/08, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Anyone want to be the "expect" package maintainer?
> To: cygwin@cy
. I asked the person responsible for the
> disappearance if they would like to become the new package maintainer
> for Cygwin and they said yes but that never materialized.
>
> The definitive sources for expect are here: http://expect.nist.gov/ .
I can at least give it a shot, since th
n of expect from the sourceware.org src repository but
>that version has disappeared. I asked the person responsible for the
>disappearance if they would like to become the new package maintainer
>for Cygwin and they said yes but that never materialized.
>
>The definitive sources f
I asked the person responsible for the
disappearance if they would like to become the new package maintainer
for Cygwin and they said yes but that never materialized.
The definitive sources for expect are here: http://expect.nist.gov/ .
I don't know if expect will work well with cygwin or not.
Larry Hall wrote, in
response to
Denis Roegel :
At 04:38 PM 2/9/2005, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have tried unsuccessfully to reach André Bleau who is/was
>the OpenGL package maintainer. Does anybody know how I can
>reach him or whom I should send my problems with the OpenGL
>pac
At 04:38 PM 2/9/2005, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have tried unsuccessfully to reach André Bleau who is/was
>the OpenGL package maintainer. Does anybody know how I can
>reach him or whom I should send my problems with the OpenGL
>package?
This list is generally the preferred way
Hi,
I have tried unsuccessfully to reach André Bleau who is/was
the OpenGL package maintainer. Does anybody know how I can
reach him or whom I should send my problems with the OpenGL
package?
Thanks,
Denis
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports
I saw in the cygwin archives that you wanted to maintain (among other
things) libao libogg libvorbis vorbis-tools for cygwin.
I'd love to, but i'm still to stupid to create shared libraries with cygwin.
I assume that means that you've gotten these packages up and running on
the cygwin environment.
I saw in the cygwin archives that you wanted to maintain (among other
things) libao libogg libvorbis vorbis-tools for cygwin.
I assume that means that you've gotten these packages up and running on
the cygwin environment. If so, do you have your work posted on an ftp site?
I've gotten these packa
Hi Folks,
I am no longer using cygwin and do not think it likely in the forseeable
future. So, I am looking for someone to take over maintainership of ctags.
The package is pretty simple - building the package does little more than
unpack the sources and call make!
If you are interested, read
Hallo Sven,
Am Montag, 11. August 2003 um 15:33 schriebst du:
> - how do i build DLLs? i could compile libao, libogg and libvorbis but i
> only get *.la and *.a files but no *.dll like i would expect. i thought
> that this would be managed by autoconf/configure somehow, but it isn't
> as it see
hough Gerrit is already the Perl package
maintainer as far as i know).
My current knowledge does not suffice to be abled to compile clean
cygwin-builds. I get everything compiled together, but i have the
following problems:
- how to install files with "make install" in another director
Hallo Sven,
Am Montag, 11. August 2003 um 15:33 schriebst du:
> i already found a freetype package by Gerrit P. Haase but it is not yet
> installable via setup (although Gerrit is already the Perl package
> maintainer as far as i know).
Freetype is / was included with the X distrib
I'm pretty sure you'll be welcome among the packaging crew. All you have to
do to become a packager is:
* subscribe to cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
* propose the package (i.e. write a mail with subject
[ITP] libvorbis
and in the contents what libvorbis is (don't expect us to know even though
Hallo Sven,
Am Dienstag, 12. August 2003 um 00:12 schriebst du:
>>>- how do i build DLLs? i could compile libao, libogg and libvorbis but i
>>>only get *.la and *.a files but no *.dll like i would expect. i thought
>>>that this would be managed by autoconf/configure somehow, but it isn't
>>>as
- how do i build DLLs? i could compile libao, libogg and libvorbis but i
only get *.la and *.a files but no *.dll like i would expect. i thought
that this would be managed by autoconf/configure somehow, but it isn't
as it seems.
Add -no-undefined to the libtool LDFLAGS.
I looked a little closer a
35 matches
Mail list logo
