On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 15:47 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
> I think it's a bad idea to have something named "ocaml" that doesn't
> implement the full upstream package. What I will do instead is:
>
> ocaml-base for the system except camlp4
> ocaml-camlp4 for camlp4
> ocamlan empty helper
Yaakov,
> Thanks for updating OCaml to use FlexDLL. There are some further
> patches required for a fully-functional OCaml:
I agree with your suggestions, and I'll use your patches and cygport
file, except for the way you implement this:
> 2) package camlp4 separately due to its size;
I think
Damien,
Thanks for updating OCaml to use FlexDLL. There are some further
patches required for a fully-functional OCaml:
1) libcamlrun_shared is not a dynlink module, it is a
dynamically-linkable OCaml interpreter (similar to libperl or libpython)
to be used by mod_ocaml. Therefore, it must be a
3 matches
Mail list logo
