Re: mkdir differences between 1.5.25 and 1.7

On Nov 2 08:22, Egerton, Jim wrote: > > > $ ls -ld /tmp/foo > > > drwxr-xr-x 1 root Administrators 0 Oct 29 20:27 /tmp/foo > > > > That's a umask thingy. Your umask is probably set to 0022, and per > > POSIX, mkdir(2) has to take the umask into account. If you use > > mkdir(1) > > from coreutil

RE: mkdir differences between 1.5.25 and 1.7

> > $ ls -ld /tmp/foo > > drwxr-xr-x 1 root Administrators 0 Oct 29 20:27 /tmp/foo > > That's a umask thingy. Your umask is probably set to 0022, and per > POSIX, mkdir(2) has to take the umask into account. If you use > mkdir(1) > from coreutils: > > mkdir -m 777 /tmp/foo > > it should crea

Re: mkdir differences between 1.5.25 and 1.7

On Oct 29 14:33, Egerton, Jim wrote: > Test program: > $ cat x.cc > #include > #include > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { >mkdir("/tmp/foo", 0777); > } > > $ ls -ld /tmp/foo > ls: cannot access /tmp/foo: No such file or directory > > $ ./x > > $ ls -ld /tmp/foo > drwxr-xr-x 1 root Ad

RE: mkdir differences between 1.5.25 and 1.7

> That's fixed in CVS. Excellent! I'm not familiar with the Cygwin build schedule - how often are the packages updated so I can give this another try? > > I also ran into a problem with the mkdir "C" API which may or may not > > be related. As far as I can tell, the permissions mask passed t

Re: mkdir differences between 1.5.25 and 1.7

On Oct 28 11:11, Egerton, Jim wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing a few things with mkdir and acl's I don't quite understand - > OS is Server 2008. > [...] > bash-3.2$ mkdir /tmp/test > bash-3.2$ getfacl /tmp/test > # file: /tmp/test > # owner: Administrator > # group: None > user::rwx > group::r-x

mkdir differences between 1.5.25 and 1.7

Hi, I'm seeing a few things with mkdir and acl's I don't quite understand - OS is Server 2008. First, from the shell I see different behaviors with mkdir on 1.5.25 and 1.7. On 1.5.25 ($ filever \\usr\\bin\\cygwin1.dll --a-- W32i DLL ENU 1005.25.0.0 shp 1,872,884 06-12-2008 cygwi