On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 13:09, kathy3826 wrote:
>
> >No, my guess is that you used mk_all when you should have used ./mk_all
> >and that shows the real problem.
>
>
> That wasn't the problem.
Wow, this has been a very interesting detective puzzle game, a bit
more dif
>No, my guess is that you used mk_all when you should have used ./mk_all
>and that shows the real problem.
That wasn't the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/mk_all-tp31655700p31665937.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 5/20/2011 3:50 AM, kathy3826 wrote:
> it must have been make all. And it seems I can bypass the one with x windows
> using source code.
No, my guess is that you used mk_all when you should have used ./mk_all
and that shows the real problem.
--
René Berber
--
Problem reports:
Thanks guys,
it must have been make all. And it seems I can bypass the one with x windows
using source code.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/mk_all-tp31655700p31662386.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Problem reports: http
On 5/19/2011 2:20 PM, kathy3826 wrote:
>
> It is from online lectures on starting one program,
> I typed make all and it says it compiled successfully,
> but it misses X Windows.
Kathy, we STILL have no idea what you're talking about. We now have a
few tiny nuggets of inform
specific to the old machine
that you were using. Run 'type mk_all' to determine which, then copy
that script or alias over to cygwin. And if it was a binary, then
hopefully you have source code.
But there's nothing we can do about it, since it is not a standard command.
--
Eri
> We have (and also Google) no clue of what mk_all is supposed to need for.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dima Pasechnik-2 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> it's not a standard command in any way. Some packages have scripts
>>> named like this,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:51 PM, kathy3826 wrote:
>
> what do you suggest i use?
to do what ?
We have (and also Google) no clue of what mk_all is supposed to need for.
>
>
>
> Dima Pasechnik-2 wrote:
>>
>>
>> it's not a standard command in any way.
;> should exist in cygwin?
>>
>>
>> Csaba Raduly-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, kathy3826 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> when i type mk_all command cygwin returns:
>>>> -bash:
anything "standard" about it, really.
Yes. Just to confirm: This is not a standard unix command. In fact,
if you type "mk_all" into google, the top hits are this very thread.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.c
r the same one
> should exist in cygwin?
>
>
> Csaba Raduly-2 wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, kathy3826 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> when i type mk_all command cygwin returns:
>>> -bash: mk_all: command not
because there should be such command in unix einvironment, so its equivalent
or the same one
should exist in cygwin?
Csaba Raduly-2 wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, kathy3826 wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> when i type mk_all command cygwin returns:
>&
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, kathy3826 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> when i type mk_all command cygwin returns:
> -bash: mk_all: command not found
Hi,
There is no Cygwin package which contains mk_all:
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=mk_all
Why do you think typi
Hi all,
when i type mk_all command cygwin returns:
-bash: mk_all: command not found
I thought i have to download some packages, perhaps someone can tell me
which?
or is it something else.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/mk_all-tp31655700p31655700.html
Sent from
14 matches
Mail list logo
