Re: missing shm_open and shm_unlink

2008-02-29 Thread rnbhays
Thank you for your quick response. Rex Hays Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 29 13:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In reply to Don Marquardt's initial question, Corinna indicated the > > shm_open and shm_unlink would be supported in the next release. I am using > > t

Re: missing shm_open and shm_unlink

2008-02-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 29 13:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In reply to Don Marquardt's initial question, Corinna indicated the shm_open > and shm_unlink would be supported in the next release. I am using the > followign version using the uname -a command > > CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2007-12-14 19:21 i

Re: missing shm_open and shm_unlink

2008-02-29 Thread rnbhays
In reply to Don Marquardt's initial question, Corinna indicated the shm_open and shm_unlink would be supported in the next release. I am using the followign version using the uname -a command CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2007-12-14 19:21 i686 Cygwin The two commands do not seem to be suppo

Re: missing shm_open and shm_unlink

2007-03-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 12 10:05, Don Marquardt wrote: > > > I am building an application that will used shared memory and I have tried > to compile the attached source file. I have version 3.4.4-3 of the gcc > compiler and appropriate support libraries. > > If I use a simple gcc command it complains > > $

missing shm_open and shm_unlink

2007-03-12 Thread Don Marquardt
I am building an application that will used shared memory and I have tried to compile the attached source file. I have version 3.4.4-3 of the gcc compiler and appropriate support libraries. If I use a simple gcc command it complains $ gcc -Wall -Werror writer.c writer.c: In function `main':