On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Reinhard Nissl wrote:
> Michael Schaap wrote:
>
> > note that you *can* rename a running executable.
>
> But isn't renaming a running executable only a feature of recent Windows
> OSs?
FYI, even on WinXP, which does allow renaming a currently running program,
Cygwin will brea
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Reinhard Nissl
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:15 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: missing sh.exe in coreutils
Hi,
Michael Schaap wrote:
> On 15-Aug-2005 10:45, Brian Dessent wrote:
>
>> Si
Hi,
Michael Schaap wrote:
On 15-Aug-2005 10:45, Brian Dessent wrote:
Sigurd Nes wrote:
Is sh.exe missing from coreutils?
I am not able to use sh after a upgrade - and sh-utils is listed as
_obsolete
First, sh is not a part of coreutils nor its predecessor sh-utils.
Until recently, /bin
On 15-Aug-2005 10:45, Brian Dessent wrote:
Sigurd Nes wrote:
Is sh.exe missing from coreutils?
I am not able to use sh after a upgrade - and sh-utils is listed as _obsolete
First, sh is not a part of coreutils nor its predecessor sh-utils.
Until recently, /bin/sh has been ash, in th
> From: Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2005-08-15 10:45:59 CEST
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: missing sh.exe in coreutils
>
> Sigurd Nes wrote:
>
> > Is sh.exe missing from coreutils?
> >
> > I am not able to use sh afte
Sigurd Nes wrote:
> Is sh.exe missing from coreutils?
>
> I am not able to use sh after a upgrade - and sh-utils is listed as _obsolete
First, sh is not a part of coreutils nor its predecessor sh-utils.
Until recently, /bin/sh has been ash, in the package 'ash'. Now it is a
copy of /bin/bash,
Is sh.exe missing from coreutils?
I am not able to use sh after a upgrade - and sh-utils is listed as _obsolete
Regards
Sigurd
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.
7 matches
Mail list logo