On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 03:07:10PM -0800, Brolin Empey wrote:
>[deleted]
Please. There was little in this message that was on-topic for the
cygwin mailing list. Please use the cygwin-talk mailing list if you
really want to pursue this further.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problem
I found this message in my hosted Gmail (Google Apps) account’s Spam
folder. I wonder why Gmail thought it was spam? Because it contained
the URL of a(n) (Windows) executable file?
Dave Korn wrote:
G.W. Haywood wrote:
BTW, if you run "setup.exe --help", it will (depending on OS
version) ei
Hello again,
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 we variously wrote:
> > That's not correct (*):
>
> Well strictly it is, since I said what would happen if you ran it, and not
> what would happen if you _didn't_ run it (for whatever reason that might
> happen to be)!
Damn. Aced. 15-love.
> [da...@ubique ~]$
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 01:23:27PM +, Dave Korn wrote:
>G.W. Haywood wrote:
>> Yes, one could just *try it*, if he had a Windows machine on which to
>> try it.
>
>*koff* Prepare to be shocked, amazed, awed and astounded!
This thread was started because Barry Buchbinder noticed a discrepancy
b
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:18:13PM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>I wasn't joking about the professional help. There's clearly some
>deep seated need there to dominate people. Unfortunately it won't
>work with everyone.
Please question my sanity in the cygwin-talk mailing list. While it
may be ent
G.W. Haywood wrote:
>> BTW, if you run "setup.exe --help", it will (depending on OS
>> version) either display the usage instructions to the screen, or
>> dump them to a setup.log file in the directory where you run it.
>
> That's not correct (*):
>
> laptop:~$ >>> ./setup.exe
> -bash: ./setup.e
Hello again,
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 several of us wrote:
> > 73,
> > Ged.
>
> Now I'm confused. Is that your high-score, your shoe size, or your age?
It's a relic from the days of morse code; just over my weight, and
half my IQ; and uncomfortably close to my age.
> BTW, if you run "setup.exe --he
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:32:43AM +, Dave Korn wrote:
>Dave Korn wrote:
>>G.W. Haywood wrote:
>>>On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 09:17:24AM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>Which is correct?
If only there was some way to tell...
>>>I think you sho
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 08:15:36AM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 09:17:24AM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>>>Which is correct?
>>
>>If only there was some way to tell...
>
>I think you should seek professional help.
Wow! Zing!
c
Dave Korn wrote:
> G.W. Haywood wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 09:17:24AM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>>>
Which is correct?
>>> If only there was some way to tell...
>> I think you should seek professional help.
>
> Nurs
G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 09:17:24AM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>>
>>> Which is correct?
>> If only there was some way to tell...
>
> I think you should seek professional help.
Nurse! The screens!
> --
>
>
Hi there,
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 09:17:24AM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>
> > Which is correct?
>
> If only there was some way to tell...
I think you should seek professional help.
--
73,
Ged.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 09:17:24AM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/setup-net.html#internet-setup
>
>says
>
>"Unfortunately setup.exe does not yet support unattended installs."
>
>but
>
>http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.cli
>
>seems to imply
Hi there,
http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/setup-net.html#internet-setup
says
"Unfortunately setup.exe does not yet support unattended installs."
but
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.cli
seems to imply that it does, via the '-q' switch.
Which is correct?
--
73,
Ged.
--
Pro
On Jan 15 13:47, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:32:12PM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
> wrote:
> >The command line arguments listed in the FAQ
> >http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.cli
> >are incomplete. The following are missing.
> >
> > -O --onl
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:32:12PM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
wrote:
>The command line arguments listed in the FAQ
>http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.cli
>are incomplete. The following are missing.
>
> -O --only-site Ignore all sites except fo
The command line arguments listed in the FAQ
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.cli
are incomplete. The following are missing.
-O --only-site Ignore all sites except for -s
-P --packages Specify packages to install
-C --categories
17 matches
Mail list logo
