virus is spreading, so is love!

-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: I would love to write sponsor post about your site

SPAM -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

I would love to write sponsor post about your site

Hello, There I am Anurag Chatap, owner of the blog Program Esecure. Have a look at my site, www.programesecure.com I'd love to write a sponsored post about your site or product. If you provide us with an article, we'd be happy to post it on our blog. Daily pageviews: 2000+ Monthly

VS Supermodels Romee Strijd & Taylor Hill Love These Hoops...

*|MC_PREVIEW_TEXT|* VS Supermodels Romee Strijd & Taylor Hill Love These Hoops... LARGE SELENA HOOPS $129.00 Gold-Fi

Re: Can not get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X .... I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY

On 04/18/2017 08:45 PM, Mike Rushton wrote: OK. I followed these instructions but I never get to see a screen. I want to un-install and re-install it. I don't see Cygwin/X in the Control Panel. How do I uninstall it ?

Re: Can not get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X .... I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY

n programs will show up. -Original Message- From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Mike Rushton Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 9:33 AM To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Can not get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY (Ok

RE: Can not get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X .... I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY

dows to Work in Cygwin/X I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY (Ok I tried to send this to the list and it failed ... I had an image of my black screen in it) I still just get a blank screen. When i type xwin or startxwin . I found instructions to look for the variable "tty" under Windo

Re: Can not get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X .... I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY

get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY Dear Cygwin, I am trying to get the X Windows to work, I must be doing something wrong. I read the FAQ and manual but no go. I have Cygwin/X installed on a Windows 7 Desktop. I type Startxwin or xwin and just get a xterm to

Re: Can not get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X .... I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY

mrushton writes: > I type Startxwin or xwin and just get a xterm to the server? Well, then X works as it's supposed to be. The standard setup is to use a rootless server and have Windows manage the application windows (like that xterm you're seeing). There should be two new icons in the try in W

RE: Can not get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X .... I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY

know if this was helpful. -Original Message- From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of mrushton Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:55 PM To: cygwin Subject: Can not get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY Dear Cygwin, I am tr

Can not get XWindows to Work in Cygwin/X .... I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY

. I would like to take this chance to say thanks for the software I LOVE CYGWIN, USE IT EVERY DAY. I have shell scripting that runs my EDI programs ... it was on the korn shell on MKS toolkit the one person i worked with wanted to save money and (unknow to me) never paid the Software

Re: OCaml on cygwin-64 (was: Orpie love

2013/08/31, Warren Young wrote: [...] > I note your inria.fr address. I assume you're part of the official > OCaml team at INRIA, or at least in close contact with them? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCaml http://caml.inria.fr/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/ocaml/trunk/ -- Regards -- Problem reports:

Re: OCaml on cygwin-64 (was: Orpie love

Hi, On 2013-08-31, at 00:31, Warren Young wrote: >> I'm making good progress on porting OCaml to cygwin-64. > > Would you care to summarize the problem? OCaml is already portable to other > x86_64 *ix targets, so a lot of the work has to have been done already. What > are the remaining blocki

Re: OCaml on cygwin-64 (was: Orpie love

On 8/30/2013 08:15, Damien Doligez wrote: I don't like RPN calculators Infidel! :) I'm making good progress on porting OCaml to cygwin-64. Would you care to summarize the problem? OCaml is already portable to other x86_64 *ix targets, so a lot of the work has to have been done already.

OCaml on cygwin-64 (was: Orpie love (was: Why are the 32- and 64-bit cygwin1.dlls incompatible?))

Hi all, On 2013-08-23, at 18:50, Warren Young wrote: > On 8/23/2013 06:42, Andrew Schulman wrote: >>> Consider Orpie, which isn't ported to Cygwin 64 yet because OCaml isn't. >> >> Hah! Another Orpie user! >> >> I love Orpie, but sometimes I&#x

Re: Orpie love (was: Why are the 32- and 64-bit cygwin1.dlls incompatible?)

On 8/23/2013 06:42, Andrew Schulman wrote: Consider Orpie, which isn't ported to Cygwin 64 yet because OCaml isn't. Hah! Another Orpie user! I love Orpie, but sometimes I've wondered if I was the only one. Everyone who appreciates HP RPN calculators should try Orpie. A dec

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Christopher Faylor wrote: > We don't programatically hexedit the static libraries. That was the > whole point of my speclib rewrite. The libraries are generated using > dlltool. Sorry, I tested the new one without reading it and didn't realise to what extent you had rewritten it. > If that's

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:31:29PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Apr 7 00:12, Dave Korn wrote: >>>Grepping through library symbols seems quite fragile when so many >>>standard C library functions are permitted to be implemented as macros. >> >>I assume they use nm rather t

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 7 00:12, Dave Korn wrote: >> Grepping through library symbols seems quite >> fragile when so many standard C library functions are permitted to be >> implemented as macros. > > I assume they use nm rather than grep. Sorry, I was just using the term in the exte

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Apr 7 00:12, Dave Korn wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:08:33PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Apr 6 13:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:29:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Wouldn't it help if libc.a, libm.a etc.

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:08:33PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Apr 6 13:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:29:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Wouldn't it help if libc.a, libm.a etc. wouldn't export any symbols at all? I

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:08:33PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Apr 6 13:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:29:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >Wouldn't it help if libc.a, libm.a etc. wouldn't export any symbols at >> >all? I mean, eventually there's libcygwi

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Apr 6 13:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:29:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Wouldn't it help if libc.a, libm.a etc. wouldn't export any symbols at > >all? I mean, eventually there's libcygwin.a linked in which satisfies > >all of the requested symbols. What w

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:29:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >Wouldn't it help if libc.a, libm.a etc. wouldn't export any symbols at >all? I mean, eventually there's libcygwin.a linked in which satisfies >all of the requested symbols. What would break if the secondary libs >pointing to cygwi

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Apr 6 16:48, Dave Korn wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:21:26PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > >> ...Both exes have an IAT from kernel32 importing GetACP and Get > >> ModuleHandleA, and two single-entry IATs referencing _impure_ptr > >> (auto-import entries, pointing

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:21:26PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> So, that's why only some applications manifest this problem; it's only >> the ones that explicitly pass -lc in their LDFLAGS. > > So, given how limited the problem is, I don't think the alarmist Subject > was

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 6 09:03, Charles Wilson wrote: >> Dave Korn wrote: >>> LOLWUT? It turns out something has gone horribly wrong in the >>> alternatives >>> department now: >>> [...] >> Actually, from Corinna's reply, it appears that, in addition to >> reverting *alternatives* be

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Charles Wilson wrote: > So, IIUC, alternatives-1.3.30c-10 isn't *itself* actually broken, right? No, I didn't mean the package is broken, just that the alternatives themselves, i.e. the symlinks, were wrong. cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe

Re: All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:21:26PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >So, that's why only some applications manifest this problem; it's only >the ones that explicitly pass -lc in their LDFLAGS. So, given how limited the problem is, I don't think the alarmist Subject was really called for. Anyone reading th

All clear [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Dave Korn wrote: > Hi all, > > [ re: ... don't update! ] > > Or at least, not without taking a backup of your Cygwin installation > first Right, panic over. If you do need to revert, it is possible, as long as you remember to take m4 and alternatives along for the ride. (Also any other

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Apr 6 09:03, Charles Wilson wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: > > LOLWUT? It turns out something has gone horribly wrong in the > > alternatives > > department now: > > [...] > > Actually, from Corinna's reply, it appears that, in addition to > reverting *alternatives* because of the dependence th

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Apr 6 09:06, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > However, just before the application's main() is called, the locale is > > set back to "C", see > > http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cygwin/dcrt0.cc.diff?r1=1.352&r2=1.353&cvsroot=src&f=h > > Hmm. "before main()

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > However, just before the application's main() is called, the locale is > set back to "C", see > http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cygwin/dcrt0.cc.diff?r1=1.352&r2=1.353&cvsroot=src&f=h Hmm. "before main()" huh? Is that *before*, or *after*, C++ static init

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Dave Korn wrote: > LOLWUT? It turns out something has gone horribly wrong in the alternatives > department now: > > $ gcc > bash: gcc: command not found > > $ gcc.exe > bash: gcc.exe: command not found > > $ file /bin/gcc.exe > /bin/gcc.exe: broken symbolic link to `/etc/alternatives/gcc' >

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Apr 6 05:56, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Dave Korn on 4/6/2009 3:08 AM: > > I wonder if m4 suddenly changed its behaviour as a result of now being > > locale sensitive, which had knock-on effects on autoconf and bison, which > > causes the trouble by doing something unexpected when gener

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Dave Korn on 4/6/2009 3:08 AM: > I wonder if m4 suddenly changed its behaviour as a result of now being > locale sensitive, which had knock-on effects on autoconf and bison, which > causes the trouble by doing something unexpected when g

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > This happens if the symlink has been created with Cygwin 1.7.0-45 > and you revert back to 1.7.0-44 or earlier. Yeh, it all went quiet for a while while I've been re-reading the recent release announcements. Thanks for the pointers. > I explained what I did to new sy

Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

On Apr 6 10:08, Dave Korn wrote: > Charles Wilson wrote: > > Dave Korn wrote: > > > >> Forgot to say... can I see your "cygcheck -cd"? I would have said "just > >> m4 > >> and cygwin", but maybe it's related to something else. > > > > Attached. FWIW, I had no problems building other things,

Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!]

Charles Wilson wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: > >> Forgot to say... can I see your "cygcheck -cd"? I would have said "just m4 >> and cygwin", but maybe it's related to something else. > > Attached. FWIW, I had no problems building other things, like > yesterday's p7zip packages or today's alternat

AVG7 users beware false positives this morning [ was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update! ]

Dave Korn wrote: > I'm about to use the time machine to install a completely fresh cygwin in a > vm. Maybe that'll get things moving again. Of ALL the times for AVG to suddenly start misdetecting "conftest.exe" as "Trojan Horse Generic2.ITN" ... this was not the best moment for it to pick. :

Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!

Charles Wilson wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: > >> Forgot to say... can I see your "cygcheck -cd"? I would have said "just m4 >> and cygwin", but maybe it's related to something else. > > Attached. FWIW, I had no problems building other things, like > yesterday's p7zip packages or today's alternat

Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!

Dave Korn wrote: > Forgot to say... can I see your "cygcheck -cd"? I would have said "just m4 > and cygwin", but maybe it's related to something else. Attached. FWIW, I had no problems building other things, like yesterday's p7zip packages or today's alternatives packages. -- Chuck Cygwin P

Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!

Dave Korn wrote: > Charles Wilson wrote: >> Dave Korn wrote: >> >>> Q2) Has anyone out there /not/ updated today, and also has a checkout of >>> CVS >>> binutils they could try building and testing? >>> >>> In either case:- >>> >>> If you get six fails, that's probably the bug I have here. >>

Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!

Charles Wilson wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: > >> Q2) Has anyone out there /not/ updated today, and also has a checkout of CVS >> binutils they could try building and testing? >> >> In either case:- >> >> If you get six fails, that's probably the bug I have here. > > I got six fails. :-/ Tha

Re: [1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!

Dave Korn wrote: > Q2) Has anyone out there /not/ updated today, and also has a checkout of CVS > binutils they could try building and testing? > > In either case:- > > If you get six fails, that's probably the bug I have here. I got six fails. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://c

[1.7]: For the love of god, don't update!

Hi all, [ re: ... don't update! ] Or at least, not without taking a backup of your Cygwin installation first, at any rate the system-related parts (/bin /usr/lib /usr/include and who knows if maybe more?), at least until we figure out whether everyone else is going to have the same utter n

Love the Cygwin Work

Hey Guys, I just Love the Cygwin Work by cygnus, even if nobody here replies or in any way answer to my Question/Problems. Its really good what i realy like was how it gets windows into linux like enviorment, Coz of this i almost created WCAMP Layout on Windows XP and even did that Webmin

love

do you love me -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: I love cygwin

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:41:44 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I love cygwin OK it official... I love you cygwin! Upgraded my company's remaining Windows users off Office to OpenOffice. Was having a problem with datasources and not having a Linux box handy I loaded up cygwin (and postgresq

I love cygwin

OK it official... I love you cygwin! Upgraded my company's remaining Windows users off Office to OpenOffice. Was having a problem with datasources and not having a Linux box handy I loaded up cygwin (and postgresql client). I was able to trouble shoot all my problems. It was great... so

Love to do on-line surveys??

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sit back, Relax, and Get Paid for What You Think! Get paid to take online surveys - $5 to $75 per survey! Get paid to participate in online focus groups $50 to $150 per hour! Get paid to try new products - keep the products and get paid too! Get paid to watch never before se

Important news about Love; Your Master Astrologer

! **...*..*..*..*..*..*..* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Your Turning Point Today Learn what the Stars have in store for you! * Love * * Money * * Career * * Business * *Health * * Children * * Marriage * * Health * You need to know what I see right now

Important news about Love; Your Master Astrologer

! **...*..*..*..*..*..*..* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Your Turning Point Today Learn what the Stars have in store for you! * Love * * Money * * Career * * Business * *Health * * Children * * Marriage * * Health * You need to know what I see right now