On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:22:53 +0100
ASSI wrote:
> Takashi Yano via Cygwin writes:
> > I think I have found the cause. It is an upstream bug of libtool.
> > The function check_executable() generated by ltmain.sh returns 1
> > for directory, but this is not correct behaviour, I think.
>
> Please repo
Takashi Yano via Cygwin writes:
> I think I have found the cause. It is an upstream bug of libtool.
> The function check_executable() generated by ltmain.sh returns 1
> for directory, but this is not correct behaviour, I think.
Please report upstream.
> I confirmed that the patch attached solves
Hi Achim,
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:58:49 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:42:05 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:38:13 +0900
> > Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:59:36 +0100
> > > Marco Atzeriwrote:
> > > > On 18/02/2025 12:56, Takashi Yano via
On 19/02/2025 13:58, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:42:05 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:38:13 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:59:36 +0100
Marco Atzeriwrote:
On 18/02/2025 12:56, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
Hi Marco,
On Mon, 17 Feb
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:42:05 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:38:13 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:59:36 +0100
> > Marco Atzeriwrote:
> > > On 18/02/2025 12:56, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > Hi Marco,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:28:11 +
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:38:13 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:59:36 +0100
> Marco Atzeriwrote:
> > On 18/02/2025 12:56, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > Hi Marco,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:28:11 +0100
> > > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > >> Hi Takashi,
> > >>
> > >> I think
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:59:36 +0100
Marco Atzeriwrote:
> On 18/02/2025 12:56, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > Hi Marco,
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:28:11 +0100
> > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >> Hi Takashi,
> >>
> >> I think there is still issue on pipe redirection output lost.
> >> I have two case
On 18/02/2025 12:56, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
Hi Marco,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:28:11 +0100
Marco Atzeri wrote:
Hi Takashi,
I think there is still issue on pipe redirection output lost.
I have two cases where during package tests the test are reported as
failures as the output is missing,
Hi Marco,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:28:11 +0100
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Hi Takashi,
>
> I think there is still issue on pipe redirection output lost.
> I have two cases where during package tests the test are reported as
> failures as the output is missing, while running the test stand alone
> the o
Hi Takashi,
I think there is still issue on pipe redirection output lost.
I have two cases where during package tests the test are reported as
failures as the output is missing, while running the test stand alone
the output is produced as expected.
The simplest one is relative to gdbm
https:/
10 matches
Mail list logo