Hi Reini,
>> There is also a thread n the archives where Charles explains why the
>> pass_all flag is not default for Cygwin.
> yes, that would be interesting to read, because I'm wondering what
> prevents libtool on cygwin to ignore the duplication of efforts
> providing PIC (in .libs) and non
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
So do I have to rebuild flex just to support a dynamic lib, which uses
some parser generator support?
2000-01-19 Thomas Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* ltmain.in: rewrite of the ILD code, merge linking code for
programs, libraries and objects, allow linking
Hi Reini,
> So do I have to rebuild flex just to support a dynamic lib, which uses
> some parser generator support?
2000-01-19 Thomas Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* ltmain.in: rewrite of the ILD code, merge linking code for
programs, libraries and objects, allow linking of sha
sorry for repating to myself.
But others had the same concerns this week
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2004-09/msg00124.html
And I'm also not convinvced that the given answer is practical.
"The static lib uses probably non-PIC code so it cannot be linked in.
Convenience libs should be
I don't where to direct libtool cygwin specific questions to, so I try
it here.
I have an already libtoolized library, which should produce a DLL,
where several subdirs are just "convenience libs".
$ pinfo libtool
> Node: Static libraries
Such a convenience lib (a bastard between a real shared an
5 matches
Mail list logo
