Thanks for the explanation/correction about umask's non-impact if
there are default ACL entries. I'm not recalling exactly what I had
seen on Linux that made me think there was an impact.
>> If the incoming, inherited ACL contains the three entries for user,
group, and other, it's with very hi
On Apr 19 13:50, random user wrote:
> >>> I note that chmod doesn't keep these to-be-inherited entries in
> sync with the directory's mode;
> >>Yep. Did you check against Linux behaviour?
>
> The difference to my eye is that on Linux there is no such
> to-be-inherited CREATOR OWNER ACL entry
Hmm... Seems my Item 1 and Item 2 are more related in your design
thinking than I had realized.
>>> "extended ACLs" (is that the proper phrasing?),
>> (default ACL entries in POSIX speak, inheritable ACEs in Windows)
I'm looking for the term that would distinguish whether on Linux ls
shows a '+'
Hi random user (at least a first name would be nice, you know my first name
as well, isn't it?),
On Apr 17 22:58, random user wrote:
> Hi again, Corinna.
>
> I appreciate these recent changes, the more complete Posix ACL support
> looks beneficial for sharing/syncing files between Cygwin and Linu
Hi again, Corinna.
I appreciate these recent changes, the more complete Posix ACL support
looks beneficial for sharing/syncing files between Cygwin and Linux
machines, and for more compatible scripting.
But I've noticed a few possibly-concerning items:
Item 1:
>> - I introduced a change in chmo
5 matches
Mail list logo
