Future of OpenGL package (Was: OpenGL ? Re: gcc 3.3.1: include problem solved)

Brian Ford wrote: These questions are mainly directed at Andre Bleau (Cygwin's OpenGL maintainer). I am glad that the ambiguity in gcc include search paths has been resolved. However, the OpenGL includes in w32api/GL are from Mesa, and are thus more complete and up-to-date. Well, I hope that Earn

OpenGL ? Re: gcc 3.3.1: include problem solved

These questions are mainly directed at Andre Bleau (Cygwin's OpenGL maintainer). I am glad that the ambiguity in gcc include search paths has been resolved. However, the OpenGL includes in w32api/GL are from Mesa, and are thus more complete and up-to-date. What are the long term plans, if any, f

gcc 3.3.1: include problem solved

I'd like to report that the problem that I reported about gcc 3.2 in: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg01556.html is no longer present with gcc 3.3.1 For those who might care, it was a problem of include files in /usr/include/w32api wrongly taking precedence over those in /usr/in