Gordon Cichon wrote:
> is there a way to install gcc 2.x on a current Cygwin installation? Is
> there a binary package to download?
>
> Best would be an installation alongside with the gcc 3 that comes with
> the current version. Is this compiler switch '-V' good for an
Hi all,
is there a way to install gcc 2.x on a current Cygwin installation? Is
there a binary package to download?
Best would be an installation alongside with the gcc 3 that comes with
the current version. Is this compiler switch '-V' good for anything? The
transistion from gcc
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Richard Greenwood wrote:
> I would like to compile some software (Grass) with gcc 2.x, ideally
> 2.95. Is there a binary cygwin distribution of gcc2 available, and if
> so, where would I look for it?
>
Please try to search the archives before posting.
http://c
I would like to compile some software (Grass) with gcc 2.x, ideally
2.95. Is there a binary cygwin distribution of gcc2 available, and if
so, where would I look for it?
Thanks,
--
Richard Greenwood
www.greenwoodmap.com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
At 01:18 PM 1/4/2004, Beman Dawes you wrote:
>OK, the tests are finished. Good news! Eleven additional Boost regression tests now
>pass and there are no new failures. The only other difference is that the version is
>being reported as GNU C++ version 3.3.1 (cygming special) rather than just GNU C
At 06:23 AM 1/4/2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Hallo Beman,
>
>Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2004 um 02:55 schriebst du:
>
>>>$ g++ -mno-cygwin fstream.cpp
>> In file included from
>> /usr/local/include/c++/3.3.1/bits/locale_facets.h:166,
>
>The default location for Cygwin & MinGW files distributed by the
Hallo Beman,
Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2004 um 02:55 schriebst du:
>>$ g++ -mno-cygwin fstream.cpp
> In file included from
> /usr/local/include/c++/3.3.1/bits/locale_facets.h:166,
The default location for Cygwin & MinGW files distributed by the
Cygwin project is /usr but not /usr/local, I suggest t
At 04:12 PM 1/3/2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Hallo Beman,
>
>I cannot reproduce it here on my NT4 SP 6a:
John Maddock can't reproduce it on his system either.
First, my results for the queries below are shown after your results:
>$ uname -svr
>CYGWIN_NT-4.0 1.5.5(0.94/3/2) 2003-09-20 16:31
CYGW
At 04:12 PM 1/3/2004, Gerrit P. Haase you wrote:
>Hallo Beman,
>
>I cannot reproduce it here on my NT4 SP 6a:
In case it's of any interest, the version that I compiled
was the same as Gerrit's in every way except it was on
W2K + SP3.
>Can you run it with gdb and try to figure out what fail
inal Message -
>>From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 2:46 PM
>>Subject: Re: Bug in fstream code and gcc-2 package?
&
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 2:46 PM
>Subject: Re: Bug in fstream code and gcc-2 package?
>
>
>> At 07:54 AM 1/2/2004, John Maddock you wrote:
>> >The following example code works cleanly on all the platforms I'
At 07:54 AM 1/2/2004, John Maddock you wrote:
>The following example code works cleanly on all the platforms I've tested
>on, except the gcc-2 package where it segfaults:
The gcc-2 package has been removed as a package from Cygwin mirrors (or
should be) and is no longer supported.
The following example code works cleanly on all the platforms I've tested
on, except the gcc-2 package where it segfaults:
#include
#include
void load_file(std::string& s, std::istream& is)
{
s.erase();
if(is.bad()) return;
//
// attempt to grow string buffer to match file
--- Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dalibor,
>
> At 01:36 2003-02-17, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> >I'm just wondering, because I got 0 replies for my
> bugreport on this
> >mailing list last week.
>
> Install the "gcc2" package.
Actually, the bugreport I've sent, has an attachment,
ge
Dalibor,
At 01:36 2003-02-17, Dalibor Topic wrote:
I'm just wondering, because I got 0 replies for my bugreport on this
mailing list last week.
Install the "gcc2" package.
However, the GCC 3.2.x compiler almost certainly did not introduce
optimizer bugs as your report suggests. Far more likel
--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's supported, but, like everything, unless you can
> demonstrate with
> a *simple* test case that there is actually a gcc
> problem (which is
> unlikely) rather than a programming error (which is
> more likely), you
> aren't apt to get much hel
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:36:04AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>I'm just wondering, because I got 0 replies for my
>bugreport on this mailing list last week.
It's supported, but, like everything, unless you can demonstrate with
a *simple* test case that there is actually a gcc problem (which is
un
I'm just wondering, because I got 0 replies for my
bugreport on this mailing list last week.
cheers,
dalibor topic
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +1100, Brendan Kosowski wrote:
> I have just installed cygwin on win98se using setup.exe. I selected gcc-2
> as the only extra on top of the base install. I told setup that I am the
> only user and I use unix style text files.
>
> When I run &qu
Dario Alcocer wrote:
> Chris, I ran into a similar problem[1] this *just* yesterday. With
> the help of the Cygwin FAQ, I remembered that symlinks are expected
> to have the DOS/NT system attribute set.
For the archives: Only the magic cookie type. For the *.lnk type, it is the
read-only attribut
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:43:36AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +1100, Brendan Kosowski wrote:
> >I have just installed cygwin on win98se using setup.exe. I selected gcc-2
> >as the only extra on top of the base install. I told setup that I
Some more info to add...
When I first install Cygwin, gcc-2 works O.K., but when I re-boot my P.C.
and try again it gets the error message mentioned previously.
Regards...
--
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Robert McNulty Junior wrote:
> Get binutils.
>
> -Original Message---
I have binutils, when I chose gcc-2 it included it (as well as
mingw-runtime) in the devel packages. All have been installed.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Robert McNulty Junior wrote:
> Get binutils.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +1100, Brendan Kosowski wrote:
>I have just installed cygwin on win98se using setup.exe. I selected gcc-2
>as the only extra on top of the base install. I told setup that I am the
>only user and I use unix style text files.
>
>When I run "Cy
Get binutils.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Brendan Kosowski
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc-2 /bin/as.exe: Permission denied
Hi,
I have just installed cygwin on win98se using
Hi,
I have just installed cygwin on win98se using setup.exe. I selected gcc-2
as the only extra on top of the base install. I told setup that I am the
only user and I use unix style text files.
When I run "Cygwin Bash Shell" and try to compile a C program in my home
dir (eg.
chine, not to the build or the user environment.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Randall R Schulz
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gcc-2 problems
David,
Surely your makefiles invoke the compile
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:44:20PM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>Instead of renaming the files create links:
>
>ln -s gcc-2.exe gcc.exe
>ln -s g++-2.exe g++.exe
>...
>
>If your fs is ntfs you can also create hard links
Of course, this *is* a new/different version of gcc v2,
Instead of renaming the files create links:
ln -s gcc-2.exe gcc.exe
ln -s g++-2.exe g++.exe
...
If your fs is ntfs you can also create hard links
Thomas
David K. McAllister wrote:
Today I updated my cygwin install for the first time in about three
months. Apparently I unwittingly installed
Of Randall R Schulz
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: gcc-2 problems
>
>
> David,
>
> Surely your makefiles invoke the compiler via an environment variable
> so as
> to allow you to override the default? Likewise you
lf
Of Randall R Schulz
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gcc-2 problems
David,
Surely your makefiles invoke the compiler via an environment variable so
as
to allow you to override the default? Likewise your configure scripts
include compiler override op
the first time in about three
months. Apparently I unwittingly installed gcc 3.2. Our code base is
staunchly gcc 2.95 for now. I discovered the gcc2 package and installed
it, but of course it's not the default and I can't change our code base
to look at gcc-2. I have to change my local
Today I updated my cygwin install for the first time in about three
months. Apparently I unwittingly installed gcc 3.2. Our code base is
staunchly gcc 2.95 for now. I discovered the gcc2 package and installed
it, but of course it's not the default and I can't change our code base
to loo
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Patrick Reuter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks a lot, gcc-2 works. Cool.
>
> Do you know how I could use the LAPACK library under cygwin/gcc-2 ?
> I have some .so files and some .a files built on a red hat system. How
> could I link them?
>
> Patr
Hi,
thanks a lot, gcc-2 works. Cool.
Do you know how I could use the LAPACK library under cygwin/gcc-2 ?
I have some .so files and some .a files built on a red hat system. How
could I link them?
Patrick
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting
35 matches
Mail list logo
