Re: gcc-core and g++ source

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Eric Blake wrote: > According to James McLaughlin on 7/26/2005 5:44 AM: > > I've been wondering about why functions such as strcpy > > return char*, instead of being void, so I thought I'd > > look at the source for this function and see if there > > were any informative comme

Re: gcc-core and g++ source

James McLaughlin wrote: > I've been wondering about why functions such as strcpy > return char*, instead of being void, so I thought I'd > look at the source for this function and see if there > were any informative comments. However, while I've got > the g++ and gcc-core source, I can't find the s

Re: gcc-core and g++ source

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to James McLaughlin on 7/26/2005 5:44 AM: > I've been wondering about why functions such as strcpy > return char*, instead of being void, so I thought I'd > look at the source for this function and see if there > were any informative comments

gcc-core and g++ source

I've been wondering about why functions such as strcpy return char*, instead of being void, so I thought I'd look at the source for this function and see if there were any informative comments. However, while I've got the g++ and gcc-core source, I can't find the source for the standard functions