> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Gray
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 6:53 PM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Why has GCC 2.95.3 been removed from Cygwin instillation
>
> Hi,
>
> Why has 2
Aaron Gray wrote:
> Why has 2.95.3 been removed from Cygwin ?
>
> I have tried to install it from GNU download but have been unsucessful.
>
> I need 2.95.3 how/can I get it built ?
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2003-10/msg00014.html
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_2.html#SEC10
--
Unsubscribe
Hi,
Why has 2.95.3 been removed from Cygwin ?
I have tried to install it from GNU download but have been unsucessful.
I need 2.95.3 how/can I get it built ?
Aaron
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation
Chan Kar Heng wrote:
I still have a copy of cygwin-B20
Nooo!
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: h
t; first bigger application (which requires SSL and mysql client) also
>> uses getarg; this is causing "SIGSEGV" crashes in the processing of
>> options. It works well under linux; the first difference is that the
>> original is compiled with gcc-2.95.3.
>
>> S
d fine, but the
> first bigger application (which requires SSL and mysql client) also
> uses getarg; this is causing "SIGSEGV" crashes in the processing of
> options. It works well under linux; the first difference is that the
> original is compiled with gcc-2.95.3.
>
getarg; this is causing "SIGSEGV" crashes in the processing of
options. It works well under linux; the first difference is that the
original is compiled with gcc-2.95.3.
So - where can I get a cygwin gcc-2.95.3 package?
Also: any ideas about the segmentation errors?
Regards
=Pat
--
--
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 04:10:18PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Larry Hall wrote:
>
>> At 09:03 AM 10/23/2003, Heiko Nardmann you wrote:
>> >
>> >Where do I find a gcc 2.95.3 package for Cygwin?
>> >
>> With any luck, n
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Larry Hall wrote:
> At 09:03 AM 10/23/2003, Heiko Nardmann you wrote:
> >
> >Where do I find a gcc 2.95.3 package for Cygwin?
> >
> With any luck, nowhere. gcc 2.95.3 is broken and as a result, has been
> removed from the distribution. You might
At 09:03 AM 10/23/2003, Heiko Nardmann you wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hi!
>
>Where do I find a gcc 2.95.3 package for Cygwin?
>
With any luck, nowhere. gcc 2.95.3 is broken and as a result, has been
removed from the distribution. You might
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Where do I find a gcc 2.95.3 package for Cygwin?
Thanks in advance!
- --
Heiko Nardmann (Dipl.-Ing. Technische Informatik)
secunet Security Networks AG - Sicherheit in Netzwerken (www.secunet.de),
Weidenauer Str. 223-225, D-57076 Siegen
Tel
Hi,
I suspect there is a very nasty bug in cygwin's gcc
port because I'm fighting with
stack corruption in my attempt to get latest kaffe (a
free software virtual machine for
Java, http://www.kaffe.org) from CVS to fully work on
cygwin.
I'm compiling using gcc 2.95.3-10 and -
0a8c0@Th
oNi...
> I am a pleased cygwin user since many years. It has always served me well
as
> a platform for easy cross-platform development.
>
> However I recently found that GCC produced .EXEs that run on NT and w2000
> but not on 98 & ME. Message produced on failing system
On Monday 6 May 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
> I'm not going to be issuing any new gcc releases until sometime after
> 3.1.
>
> I guess this needs to be a FAQ or something.
OK.
David
(Cygwin FAQ maintainer)
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:
in
package is being worked on.
Cheers,
/ChJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert]
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:25:
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:25:58PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Chris,
>Would you be willing to accept this patch into the Cygwin gcc source tree?
I'm not going to be issuing any new gcc releases until sometime after
3.1.
I guess this needs to be a FAQ or something.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info:
Chris,
The attached patch eliminates warnings such as the following:
In file included from /usr/include/g++-3/set:31,
from ../main.cc:145:
/usr/include/g++-3/stl_tree.h: In function `int __black_count(_Rb_tree_node_base *,
_Rb_tree_node_base *)':
/usr/include/g++-3/stl_tree.h:1
Original Message-
> From: Alex Song [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 08:14
> To: Michael A Chase; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: gcc bug, cygwin specific cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5
>
> hi,
>
> is end being a global variable specific
> From: Alex Song [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> is end being a global variable specific to the C language (which i doubt)
? to
> gcc ? to cygwin ? to windows ? or is it ALWAYS the case ?
It's not always the case. I was able to compile/run the test program on
Solaris, with three different compiler
cygwin specific cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5
>
>
> 'end' is not a reserved word, it's a global variable name. In other
> environments, overwriting it may not cause an immediate disaster, but
> probably will eventually.
> --
> Mac :})
> ** I normally forward pr
bug, cygwin specific cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5
> > >The global 'end' is a reserved word. It refers to the end of the data
> > >area. That means you can't use it as a global variable in your
program.
>
> is this reserved word cygwin specific ? or is it a r
> >The global 'end' is a reserved word. It refers to the end of the data
> >area. That means you can't use it as a global variable in your program.
is this reserved word cygwin specific ? or is it a reserved word for all gcc ?
thanks for your help.
cheers,
alex
-
>>hi,
>>
>>i think i have found a bug, either that or i am very stupid. the bug is a
>>gcc bug and it is cygwin specific (cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5) and the
>>following code causes a seg fault:
>>---
>>
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:03:26PM +1000, Alex Song wrote:
>hi,
>
>i think i have found a bug, either that or i am very stupid. the bug is a
>gcc bug and it is cygwin specific (cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5) and the
>following code cau
hi,
i think i have found a bug, either that or i am very stupid. the bug is a
gcc bug and it is cygwin specific (cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5) and the
following code causes a seg fault:
---
int end;
int main ()
{
end = 1;
return 0
Laurence F. Wood wrote:
>
> By any chance did the person that broke gcc also work on (and break)
> bison-1.31-1?
add(LaurenceWood) killfile. Welcome to the world of McNulty.
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:41:48PM -0500, Laurence F. Wood wrote:
>The Cygwin version of gcc that currently downloads with setup
>(gcc-2.95.3-5.tar.bz2) is BROKEN! Although I don't have time to
>specifically isoloate the problem, the compiler breaks (reporting a
>meanin
The Cygwin version of gcc that currently downloads with setup
(gcc-2.95.3-5.tar.bz2) is BROKEN! Although I don't have time to
specifically isoloate the problem, the compiler breaks (reporting a
meaningless error) when compiling complex code using templates an example of
which fo
Cygwin -1.3.9-1)
>> and also installed gcc/gcc-2.95.3-5 (C, C++, Fortran compiler).
>
>> However, I tried compiling a C program I wrote but got the following error:
>
>> /usr/lib/gc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-5 /../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/1d:
>> cannot find -1user
Hallo DaSpinman,
Am 2002-01-27 um 23:10 schriebst du:
> I recently downloaded Cygwin 2days ago with the hope of using gcc to compile
> my C programs on it. I successfully installed Cygwin (Cygwin/Cygwin -1.3.9-1)
> and also installed gcc/gcc-2.95.3-5 (C, C++, Fortran compiler).
>
| I'm quite knew to Cygwin and don't know what could be responsible for the
| above error. I downloaded all the Deve1 packages, binutils, make and Utils
| packages also since I found that they would be required for compiling my C
| programs..
You need to install the "w32api" package.
Hello,
I recently downloaded Cygwin 2days ago with the hope of using gcc to compile
my C programs on it. I successfully installed Cygwin (Cygwin/Cygwin -1.3.9-1)
and also installed gcc/gcc-2.95.3-5 (C, C++, Fortran compiler).
However, I tried compiling a C program I wrote but got the
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:20:41PM +0900, Humitaka Tamura wrote:
> Hello.
>
> GCC 2.95.3-5 reports internal compiler error for the following source
> code. Maybe it's only the cygwin special version's case, since other
> versions of gcc (2.96, egcs-2.91.66) for Linux
Hello.
GCC 2.95.3-5 reports internal compiler error for the following source
code. Maybe it's only the cygwin special version's case, since other
versions of gcc (2.96, egcs-2.91.66) for Linux can compile it well.
--
class A
{
public:
void f() {}
};
template class C
{
fri
34 matches
Mail list logo
