On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:04:04PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 21 20:31, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:22:56PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > > I'm seeing this on the 20050916 but as far as I know it's not a
> > > regression. A new perl test (
On Sep 21 20:31, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:22:56PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > I'm seeing this on the 20050916 but as far as I know it's not a
> > regression. A new perl test (actually using an existing file opened
> > for read access) turned this up
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:22:56PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> I'm seeing this on the 20050916 but as far as I know it's not a
> regression. A new perl test (actually using an existing file opened
> for read access) turned this up.
>
> The following gives:
> after fchmod to 0 and chmo
I'm seeing this on the 20050916 but as far as I know it's not a
regression. A new perl test (actually using an existing file opened
for read access) turned this up.
The following gives:
after fchmod to 0 and chmod to 0666, stat: 666 fstat: 444
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, c
4 matches
Mail list logo