Re: Cygwin fork performance followup

2021-02-04 Thread Eliot Moss
On 2/4/2021 9:29 AM, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin wrote: > Hi all, > > I managed to improve my Cygwin VM's performance significantly using a > variety of methods. > > If anyone else is experiencing troubles, seeing what I changed at > https://www.hamishmb.com/blog/improving-cygwins-performanc

Cygwin fork performance followup

2021-02-04 Thread Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin
Hi all, I managed to improve my Cygwin VM's performance significantly using a variety of methods. If anyone else is experiencing troubles, seeing what I changed at https://www.hamishmb.com/blog/improving-cygwins-performance-fork/ might also help you. Not using VirtualBox was the main improvement

Re: fork performance

2008-05-19 Thread Christian Franke
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 19 06:47, Reinhard Nissl wrote: Hi, running the following command sequence in bash yields little numbers compared to a real unix system: while true ; do date ; done | uniq -c 15 Thu May 15 10:40:22 2008 16 Thu May 15 10:40:23 200

Re: fork performance

2008-05-19 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Reinhard Nissl on 5/18/2008 10:47 PM: | running the following command sequence in bash yields little numbers | compared to a real unix system: | | Is there a chance to speedup performance? Only if you know how to improve Windows itself t

Re: fork performance

2008-05-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 19 06:47, Reinhard Nissl wrote: > Hi, > > running the following command sequence in bash yields little numbers > compared to a real unix system: > > while true ; do date ; done | uniq -c > > 15 Thu May 15 10:40:22 2008 > 16 Thu May 15 10:40:23 2008 > 17 Thu M

fork performance

2008-05-18 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, running the following command sequence in bash yields little numbers compared to a real unix system: while true ; do date ; done | uniq -c 15 Thu May 15 10:40:22 2008 16 Thu May 15 10:40:23 2008 17 Thu May 15 10:40:24 2008 17 Thu May 15 10:40:25