I forgot to cc the list, but the origin of the issue might be of
interest to someone.
On 10/5/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, this was a weird one. I think the underlying problem must be a bug in
> larceny's final link stage during the build. First, this command made your
> bi
On 05 October 2007 03:28, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
[ Cc'ing the mailing list back in. ]
> On 10/4/07, Lynn Winebarger <> wrote:
>> On 10/4/07, Dave Korn <> wrote:
>>> Yes, why not; feel free to send them both to me, off list. Can't promise
>>> I'll spot anything, but I'll take a look. (My first
On 04 October 2007 16:04, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 04 October 2007 15:26, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
>>> Thanks, Dave. I did compile a hello-world.c program, and it ran, but
>>> I had also compiled PLT scheme v360 before (needed to bootstrap
>>>
On 10/4/07, Lynn Winebarger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 04 October 2007 15:26, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
> > > Thanks, Dave. I did compile a hello-world.c program, and it ran, but
> > > I had also compiled PLT scheme v360 before (needed to boot
On 10/4/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04 October 2007 15:26, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
> > Thanks, Dave. I did compile a hello-world.c program, and it ran, but
> > I had also compiled PLT scheme v360 before (needed to bootstrap
> > Larceny) and had run it without problem as well (I ha
On 04 October 2007 15:26, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
>>> you see an error message along those lines, yes? Hm. Does it still
>>> happen if you compile the most basic sort of "hello world" program?
>>
>>
>> It might also be informative to run "cygcheck " on your
>> compiled executable; that'll di
(Sorry for the formatting, I belatedly subscribed to the list and got
this as a thread digest)
> From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On 04 October 2007 14:56, Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> >> We might be able to make guesses at what was wrong with the compiled
> >> program if you told us *in wha
On 04 October 2007 14:59, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 04 October 2007 14:56, Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> On 04 October 2007 14:21, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
>>
>>>I am trying to get the Larceny Scheme compiler
>>> (http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/Larceny/) to compile (and work)
>>> under the most recent s
On 04 October 2007 14:56, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 04 October 2007 14:21, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
>
>>I am trying to get the Larceny Scheme compiler
>> (http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/Larceny/) to compile (and work)
>> under the most recent stable Cygwin release. While I have managed to
>> get
On 04 October 2007 14:21, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
>I am trying to get the Larceny Scheme compiler
> (http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/Larceny/) to compile (and work)
> under the most recent stable Cygwin release. While I have managed to
> get it to produce a file that very closely resembles a
I am trying to get the Larceny Scheme compiler
(http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/Larceny/) to compile (and work)
under the most recent stable Cygwin release. While I have managed to
get it to produce a file that very closely resembles a PE file, it
apparently is not close enough to satisfy Wind
ty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"...
(gdb) run test1.v
Starting program: /usr/home/thomas/Dev/Verilog7/vxl test1.v
Error creating process /usr/home/thomas/Dev/Verilog7/vxl, (error 193)
I attached the 'cygcheck -s -v -r > cygcheck.out' file.
12 matches
Mail list logo
